Downtime for what?Well money and downtime
The ride would not require downtime. As posted time and time again.
Downtime for what?Well money and downtime
They can remove it with little or no downtime.Well money and downtime
By the same insiders that said it was going to be fixed. If the workers will have to work near other supports, near the track or there is a common slab poured over the footings then the ride will have to be closed while work is on going. This isn't like the figures on other rides that can be simply removed from it base and fixed. the base is bad and very large. This is assuming it is the footing and not the figure itselfDowntime for what?
The ride would not require downtime. As posted time and time again.
Don't listen to him Martin - he's trying to convince me to take his tour instead...They can remove it with little or no downtime.
EDIT: Sorry Martin, we posted at the same time... JINX!
I trust you martin it is so hard to keep track of the 900+ "insiders" on this site and repeated twitter rumors that become factI don't recall any "insiders" saying it (foundation) was definitely going to be fixed.
I'm no structural engineer but the foundation base looked fine to me last time I saw it.
Thank you. I just post what I know with no disclaimer, when I can say something. I'm no insider as such. I'm just lucky to have gotten to know people over the years.I trust you martin it is so hard to keep track of the 900+ "insiders" on this site.
I believe the yeti can be removed from the mountain. He was installed in crates, so he must've been taken apart for installation. The issue, like many have said, is his foundation. The concrete is supposedly broken, which is why we have B-mode.
Here's how I think yeti removal/fixing/re-install would look:
1. Close down Everest
2. Tear up concrete under yeti, making the ride's concrete cracked
3. remove the yeti
4. Fix the yeti
5. Re- install yeti
6. fix concrete
7. Re- Open Everest
If indeed it is that concrete that is the problem you have 5 and 6 reversed. It it is just the concrete then the Yeti is fine and it's the foundation that is the problem, so no need to fix the Yeti. Since it has been suggested that the problem is in the sled that the Yeti stands on that was unable to take the stress, then they only have to fix that. Anyway one looks at it though, there is really no reason to close the ride. That part is fine and the work can be done while the attraction is open. So if that is the case, they just plain don't want too. I vote for the last reason.
I don't recall any "insiders" saying it (foundation) was definitely going to be fixed.
Tests have been done, the figure has been removed and put back.
I'm no structural engineer but the foundation base looked fine to me last time I saw it.
I can answer that if you don't mind, but, I'm sure the Martin will do so as well. They didn't start out thinking that a broken Yeti was a positive. I think originally they just didn't know what the fix would be and they did a lot of engineering studies to find out what was going on.Thank you! Solid info at last! So..in your opinion, does TDO/Burbank have the WILL to fix the Yeti? Are they seriously considering it? And if not...what's their excuse?
I can answer that if you don't mind, but, I'm sure the Martin will do so as well. They didn't start out thinking that a broken Yeti was a positive. I think originally they just didn't know what the fix would be and they did a lot of engineering studies to find out what was going on.
As time when on, they realized that, people were still enjoying the ride without an actual "moving" Yeti and that within a generation the majority of guest wouldn't even know that it was ever supposed to move. So the "business" question is... Should we spend the money to repair something that a whole bunch of people never saw even when it was working and at this point are still at odds about whether it is actually moving or not right now. The "business" answer of course would be... Why adversely affect the bottom line when almost no one is even conscious of the fact the it is supposed to be moving in actuality.
Yes, it does seem like that is the way it would work, but, we must stop putting our own habits or procedures on the rest of the world. There are many people that either don't know how to actually research on the web or don't have the time to do so that just plain do not ever do it. They will go to Disney's Official Site and see all the fantastic looking attractions, price the hotels, glance over what they think are incidentals or just "extras" and either book online or go to a travel agent that probably has no real knowledge of Disney Parks. The agent might even know about the problems, but, since they are trying to sell a trip to someone, they will commit the error of omission.Thank you. I appreciate your reply.
But I have to say that if Disney has really gone with the "business" answer...well I think that's pretty stupid of them. This is the Internet age, after all, when any and all info is available to everybody, and if there are people out there who aren't aware of the malfunctioning Yeti, they can and probably will stumble across that fact on practically any Disney-fan site and forum on the web they visit. And I bet when people DO find out about it, their impression of Disney as a top-drawer company is tarnished a bit. Of course, some of them will probably think, "Well, Disney World, it's for kids, after all," as if that excuses laziness and greed and contempt for the customer. Sheesh.
Here's a sample of the knowledge available on the web about the Yeti. It doesn't make the company look good: http://www.travelandleisure.com/articles/25-things-you-didnt-know-about-disney-parks/6
By the way, when did EE open exactly?
This has never been confirmed. There have been reports that it is the foundation, the sled mounted to the foundation and the back of the Yeti, and other items. Do you have any facts to back up your claim? Even our insiders have not confirmed the actual failure(s).It is not the foundation. It was said that the issue was the sliding mechanism that the Yeti is attached to (in his back) is damaged. The foundation the entire thing rests on is fine.
Thanks.Soft open: January 26, 2006
open: April 7, 2006
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.