AdventureHasAName
Well-Known Member
I agree that it is not a good strategy, but it is a strategy that Disney employed for quite a while. When it was operating under a "get them on property, then keep them on property" philosophy, Disney used to go after competitors all the time.I'm also not sure what people think they should be doing against Epic Universe. I get the impression people think Disney should be opening big new attractions against it to try and crush it in some way. That doesn't actually seem like a very good strategy to me and, if anything, having things ready to go in the years after it opens, the hype goes down, and they have a better sense of what its opening has meant for the Orlando theme park market seems smarter. I say that as someone who doesn't even like much of what they have in the pipeline for Orlando.
Universal was pulling guests? Let's build Disney-MGM Studios. People are going to Church Street Station at night because there's nothing to do at WDW? Here comes Pleasure Island. Busch Gardens is pulling away some of the money? Animal Kingdom gets built.
Hell, the entire Disney California Adventure park on opening day was a series of lands designed so that guests wouldn't leave and go explore the surrounding areas of Los Angeles.