Wow thats a tough question!

MAF

Well-Known Member
My vote is DHS, although I think most people can see that Epcot isn't what it used to be. I think it went down the tubes when Disney tried to turn it into a "thrill ride" park by getting rid of its dark ride classics. IMO Test Track and Mission:Space are a waste of space.
 

plaz10

Well-Known Member
Peace out Animal Kingdom, it's been fun.


I don't even think I will visit DAK this upcoming trip. I really only enjoy Everest, Safari and Finding Nemo Musical. With a broken Yeti, the same animals I have seen the past 4 trips and a long wait for the musical...I'll probably pass.

I just can't justify wasting a morning on DAK. Would much rather be getting a Fastpass for Soarin, TSMM or RnRC than Everest.
 

WDW_Princess

New Member
I would have to go with DHS. I am not an AK fan and I love Tower of Terror, but I like Dinosaur and EE more. Maybe they could just combine those two. But, how could they retheme the rides form DHS to fit in at AK?
 

Wilt Dasney

Well-Known Member
I'll throw it out there...MK.

Yes, I'd miss the monorail approach, the TTA, and a couple of other elements here and there, but on the whole, its loss would be compensated for me by the existence of the best theme park on planet Earth on the opposite coast.

Epcot has no replacement, and while bits and pieces of the other two parks can be found at DCA, they're unique enough in their own right.
 

PHSCoach

Member
I can't see getting rid of any of the parks, but if I had to make a choice it would be DHS. The park is not what it used to be and don't spend much time there at all anymore.
 

rkelly42

Well-Known Member
MK really? Im not even sure how this could even be considered, but to each his own. If I had to vote it would have to be DHS, that is just my opinion though, only a couple of attractions that I am into there, being ToT, RnRC and TSMM. I would keep Ak because I love the theming and the AK lodge would be kind of lost without it.
 

skimbob

Well-Known Member
Am I allowed to vote for Disneyland??

If not, it would have to be Hollywood Studios. When it was a real film studio it was better, but now it seems to have lost its way even though my favourite ride (Tower of Terror) is there.
I can't believe anyone would say Disneyland. It is after all the original. Walt put his heart and soul into that park. It's also the only one he was able to visit. It's his legacy. Need I say more.

I would have to say Hollywood Studios.
 

pumpkin7

Well-Known Member
i would also have to say AK.
unfortunately for me, i do not see the point of paying £3000 for a trip to florida and disney to see animals that i could see in the local zoo or safari park.
all the other parks i love.
 

Thrill

Well-Known Member
Probably Hollywood Studios. Though Animal Kingdom doesn't have many good attractions, its best attractions are exclusive. DHS has really one exclusive that I really like, which is The Great Movie Ride. DHS' Tower of Terror is better than the rest (save for maybe Tokyo's), but I take three exclusive E-Tickets (even when none of them are working 100%) over one exclusive E-Ticket and one E-Ticket that's slightly better than its counterparts. Plus the fact that Animal Kingdom is a one of a kind Disney park, while DHS does have a "twin" in Paris.

I couldn't get rid of Epcot, as it has some great exclusives, a one of a kind theme, and good food (which the other parks lack). As for Magic Kingdom, I could not possibly imagine going to WDW and not riding Haunted Mansion, Big Thunder Mountain, Space Mountain, Carousel of Progress, Pirates of the Caribbean, etc. Granted, all of them (except Carousel of Progress) are at other Disneylands across the world, but I don't visit any of them regularly. Plus WDW's Haunted Mansion (my all time favorite attraction) is arguably the best in the world, depending on one's view of Phantom Manor.

If I had to get rid of any park in the world, it would be between DHS, Walt Disney Studios Paris, and Hong Kong Disneyland. The parks all seem to not have much to do, and though the latter two are getting relatively large expansions (Ratatouille and 3 small lands, respectively) I don't believe that they are enough. As CEO, I'd get rid of DHS, knowing that getting rid of HKDL ruins an entire resort and getting rid of WDSP severely shrinks another.
 

njDizFan

Well-Known Member
My vote is for DHS, although it has some great attractions(ToT, RnRC, GMR) and Fantasmic!, I could not stand to lose the other parks.

Wilt made a good point though, if you closed the MK you could still see most of those attractions at DL.
 

skimbob

Well-Known Member
I am a Californian and I have to say that even though there is Disneyland WDW would not be the same without MK. There are differences in the parks. I am living proof of it's importance because I come from all the way here to visit WDW and it's not cheap. I will be in Florida again the beginning of March and I will spend most of my time at MK.
 

s.ollie

Active Member
Animal Kingdom.... i've just never had a "great" day in AK, some years i'd even give it a miss completely and spend that time in Euphoria (aka. MK)
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom