Lee
Adventurer
Disney doesn't have a 22 foot anything taking a swipe at you. Not anymore.But o they have a 22 foot Dragon taking a swipe at you?
Disney doesn't have a 22 foot anything taking a swipe at you. Not anymore.But o they have a 22 foot Dragon taking a swipe at you?
It's winning by a margin and may lose in the end. But no matter. If you ask Disney fans whether Disney or something else is better, you will always get a much higher number of pro-Disney votes than if you asked elsewhere. That's just common sense.How would you know? There must be something to it if its winning on a Walt Disney World fan site.
Also no offense but what type of comment is this? How can you even say "they don't top the feeling of Disney" without ever having even been to the park? I know that old adage of "don't judge a book by it's cover" gets thrown to the wind around here, but sometimes I wish people would at least try it before knocking it. Sorry, not trying to attack you by any means but statements like yours just seem odd to me considering you've never been. You know what happens when you assume...Never been to Universal...I just dont think they top the feeling of Disney
This pretty much sums up where most of the DHS votes probably came from. Disney die-hard fans who have never been to Universal, or shoot it down because it doesn't have that "feeling". The "feeling" is simply nostalgia and being somewhere that you're familiar with and that you can easily recognize. But this post doesn't make sense because you haven't actually been there...Never been to Universal...I just dont think they top the feeling of Disney
Why shouldn't somebody say he thinks UNI's feel does not top Disney when he's never visited?
Me, I have never been to DisneySea, but I think it's feeling tops Walt Disney Studios Paris.
Besides, I have visited both the UNI and Disney parks on both US coasts, and I for one agree that no UNI park tops the feeling of any US Disney park, with the possible exceptions of DAK and DCA 1.0.
Nemo is at Animal Kingdom.I don't think so. There's no way DCA has more attractions than all of WDW. MK alone has more attractions than DCA, I believe. Yeah, why only put a few rides on each park? There's so much potential with all that space. What's also confusing is the attraction for an attraction thing going on. Why take out an attraction for another attraction if the space is there? I can see why Disneyland sometimes does it but I was so shocked to hear about Snow White leaving.
The Indy show sounds very interesting. Am I correct? Is the Nemo show in DHS? I know Florida has a Beauty and the Beast show. That is in DHS as well, right? I'd love to see those.
Nemo is at Animal Kingdom.
Uni is not like Cedar Point. I like Cedar Point, don't get me wrong! It is a step up from most amusement parks in both rides and cleanliness.Hello everyone. New member here (although I've followed the forums for many years).
In regards to the actual question I'll start by saying that I have not actually visited Universal (I would like to but it just never works out cost wise), so I'll try my best not to sound uninformed.
I would take DHS based on how much I love the atmosphere of the park. Hollywood Blvd. and that general area feels amazing to me. The detail and themeing is out of this world and I am always dazzled by it. I'm seen many pictures and walkthroughs of Universal Studios and I feel theme wise (and these are supposed to be theme parks) I feel DHS takes the cake which is a big deal for me. Also I love ToT, Rockin, TSM, The Great Movie Ride, and Star Tours and they are all among my favorite attractions period.
Universal seems to offer more in terms of rides however I (personally) tend to put less stock in the pure ride aspect. Honestly I spend the money to fly down to Florida to experience something I can't get anywhere else and while Universal is a big step up from say Six Flags, I feel if I wanted rides I'd just go to Cedar Point where I live.
Universal is no doubt a good park and DHS has A LOT of work needed to have it realize it's full potential (and by full potential I don't mean Carsland) however at the end of the day I love DHS. Always have and always will.
The Indy show is very cool. There's also Lights, Motors, Action! a car stunt show which is really neat. Some people on here don't like it, but I always have. There's a Little Mermaid show as well. And a Beauty and the Beast show. It's very neat, but I don't think either of those shows are as good as Aladdin in DCA. They've both been there a long time and are still really really popular, so they should be there by the time you go. There's also an American Idol show. I've never done that. To me, it's karaoke on steroids, as if the poolside karaoke isn't bad enough. Well, to be fair, you do have to audition, so you shouldn't get too many off key singers, but still. There's also the backlot tour, which is an attempt at bringing Hollywood to Orlando. They have a few fake movie sets, but then some real props. I think it's cool. You'd probably find it cheesier than the real Hollywood since you're from that area. Oh, and Fantasmic.I don't think so. There's no way DCA has more attractions than all of WDW. MK alone has more attractions than DCA, I believe. Yeah, why only put a few rides on each park? There's so much potential with all that space. What's also confusing is the attraction for an attraction thing going on. Why take out an attraction for another attraction if the space is there? I can see why Disneyland sometimes does it but I was so shocked to hear about Snow White leaving.
The Indy show sounds very interesting. Am I correct? Is the Nemo show in DHS? I know Florida has a Beauty and the Beast show. That is in DHS as well, right? I'd love to see those.
It's very hard to believe you've actually seriously looked at anything besides a few shots of The Incredible Hulk or Dragon Challenge when you say something as silly as this.Universal seems to offer more in terms of rides however I (personally) tend to put less stock in the pure ride aspect. Honestly I spend the money to fly down to Florida to experience something I can't get anywhere else and while Universal is a big step up from say Six Flags, I feel if I wanted rides I'd just go to Cedar Point where I live.
Uni is not like Cedar Point. I like Cedar Point, don't get me wrong! It is a step up from most amusement parks in both rides and cleanliness.
But Uni s nothing like CP.
You should really visit both parks before attempting to determine which is better. You will be dazzled by the theming at Uni, too.
The Indy show is very cool. There's also Lights, Motors, Action! a car stunt show which is really neat. Some people on here don't like it, but I always have. There's a Little Mermaid show as well. And a Beauty and the Beast show. It's very neat, but I don't think either of those shows are as good as Aladdin in DCA. They've both been there a long time and are still really really popular, so they should be there by the time you go. There's also an American Idol show. I've never done that. To me, it's karaoke on steroids, as if the poolside karaoke isn't bad enough. Well, to be fair, you do have to audition, so you shouldn't get too many off key singers, but still. There's also the backlot tour, which is an attempt at bringing Hollywood to Orlando. They have a few fake movie sets, but then some real props. I think it's cool. You'd probably find it cheesier than the real Hollywood since you're from that area. Oh, and Fantasmic.
Generally, aging attractions get replaced. Snow White was aging and not popular. Maybe it's more popular over in DL. I found this to be the case with Small World (but then again, DL's Small world is better). I don't think they wanted two Snow Whites since they're putting in a roller coaster based on Snow White, which the majority of us prefer anyway. Toontown went too. After being to Disneyland's Toontown, it seriously needed to go. Storybook Circus is much better. The exception was Mr. Toad's Wild ride. That did not need to go. They like to space things out. I know with MK they also have to work around the structure. You probably knew this, but you're about 100 ft above ground in MK. Everything behind the scenes is underground. It's a neat idea, but too costly to employ in the rest of the parks. Disneyland at first was a bit disconcerting because of how close together everything is. I like that everything is spaced out even if it means I have to walk farther.
If you go, plan on going after 2014. That's when New Fantasyland should be done.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.