Goofyernmost
Well-Known Member
No, it was worth it and timely when it was opened. It was a great influence on a lot of young people and great entertainment for a lot of adults. It was well worth being in existence. Moore's Law was in existence earlier, but not widely known except by people in the computer electronics field. Disney was up on computers and their advancements but Moore's conclusions didn't take the internet into account and the impact that social media would have because it wasn't in existence at the time.Judging from the comments, being built to begin with.
They made a mistake on two items. One was the concept that the internet would make new item promotions instantaneous whereas Disney would take months to design and build attractions that kept up. If they picked up on an idea or product by the time they could display it, the next one would have been introduced. Second was the Edutainment aspect. They felt that advertising it as Edutainment would be incentive but it instead created the atmosphere of going to school. An atmosphere that many spent money on vacations to avoid. Had they just relied on the entertainment it might have had a longer life, also a few quality upgrades would have helped extend the life of the concept. Instead people started to lose interest and those that still supported the park, financially, were not enough to keep it going. In short, EPCOT Center was brilliant but it's concept only had about a 10 year shelf life due to its own mission. However, it was great while it lasted.
Last edited: