PolyneisanAlex
New Member
I know there Deluxe resorts but for some reasson thoses are the only 2 that dont fully meant the expedations of a Deluxe resort anyone else agree?
EXCLUDING THE VILLAS
EXCLUDING THE VILLAS
Nope, don't agree at all. They meet my expectations and we have stayed at the WL over 10 times now. They may be smaller and less expensive, but still meet the criteria of a Deluxe.
To me, yes. I won't lie and say I don't wish the rooms were bigger, but the restaurants, grounds, transportation and facilities make it all worth it.
I agree with you. The WL reminds me of a lodge I saw in Colorado at one point (and that reminds me of snow and I live in Chicago--don't want to be reminded of that). That is why we choose the CSR--nice southwest theme, palm trees out my window, etc., and the price is right.
Hopefully it reminds you of this:
...in Yellowstone Natl. Park
Just as GF looks just a little like this San Diego gem:
Well everyone has there own thoughts on things so no ones correct and no ones wrong
really my only two negatives is the AKL location
WL theming sorry if i want to see trees and lodges i can go on a 2 hour ride to Poconos Mountains. in Floridia I want to see palm trees and hammacks
Hopefully the second try at attachements was better.
As Tigsmom said, good thing that WDW offers so many options that there are different environments for all our tastes.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.