Will DCA be a Complete, Well Rounded and Full Day Park after the New Rides Open?

Will DCA be a Complete, Well Rounded and Full Day Park after the New Rides Open?

  • Yes

  • No, it will still need another major family attraction/ dark ride or two

  • No, it still needs at least another coaster

  • No, it needs a couple more attractions with heart like the stuff over in Fantasyland

  • No, it needs 1-2 more quality well themed lands on the Simba Lot

  • No, it needs a Transpo ride like the Train, Twain or Main Street Vehicles (RIP Red Car Trolley)

  • Two or more of the above (please explain)

  • Nothing they feasibly do can make it a full day park in my eyes

  • It already is a Complete, Well Rounded and Full Day park

  • Other (please explain)


Results are only viewable after voting.

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I'd fully expect Avatar to have a thrill aspect and height requirement. Coco probably not.

Coco is aimed at family audiences. Avatar is aimed at tween and up. They're not going to make the only Avatar attraction here Nav'i River Ride 2.0.

Shangai POTC does not have a height requirement. Does any Disney boat ride in the world have a height requirement?
 

CaptinEO

Well-Known Member
Yeah the focus shifting away from fun/ whimsy/ to tech and hyper immersive single IP lands definitely has something to do with it.

Coco and Avatar will be two family dark rides/ boat rides with no heigh requirements that the park desperately needs. High capacity dark ride that’s not an E ticket? That seems kind of niche. What ride at Disneyland would you say fits this description? Do the Fantasyland dark rides have great capacity?
So I should have also mentioned and factored in square footage as that is really the trend now taking up massive plots of land for low capacity attractions.

For example Snow White has a capacity of 1100 per hour with a 6200 sq ft building. Rise of the Resistance has a 1500 per hour capacity with a 165,000 sq ft building.

In that space you can fit 26 Snow White's and a theoretical capacity of 28,600 people per hour vs RotR's 1500. Now don't get me wrong, of course you want different types of rides in a park. But at the end of the day Disney seems only intent on massive rides that are not people eaters.

Probably can attribute this to WDI needing to show off as well as incentivizing long queues with paid lightning lane (Disney is in a position where they create problems and charge the customer to resolve it).

In summary, the dark rides are amazing people eaters per square foot and WDI is too intent on having their execs appear on ABC TV specials to show off how lifelike the skin of a cartoon character can look on a 20 million dollar animatronic people will see for 10 seconds per ride.

Sources:


 
Last edited:

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
So I should have also mentioned and factored in square footage as that is really the trend now taking up massive plots of land for low capacity attractions.

For example Snow White has a capacity of 1100 per hour with a 6200 sq ft building. Rise of the Resistance has a 1500 per hour capacity with a 165,000 sq ft building.

In that space you can fit 26 Snow White's and a theoretical capacity of 28,600 people per hour vs RotR's 1500. Now don't get me wrong, of course you want different types of rides in a park. But at the end of the day Disney seems only intent on massive rides that are not people eaters.

Probably can attribute this to WDI needing to show off as well as incentivizing long queues with paid lightning lane (Disney is in a position where they create problems and charge the customer to resolve it).

In summary, the dark rides are amazing people eaters per square foot and WDI is too intent on having their execs appear on ABC TV specials to show off how lifelike the skin of a cartoon character can look on a 20 million dollar animatronic people will see for 10 seconds per ride.

Sources:



26 Snow Whites!! It’s crazy when you put it like that. lol. Especially when the capacity is so close. Which is kind of surprising it’s that close tbh. Those numbers dont account for how many people are being held in the queue right? Something to consider but to your point the people in the queue aren’t riding. But the park walkways are emptier.

So let’s say that with modern regulations that something like Snow White would need to be twice the size that’s still 13 Snow Whites. I think there a lot of reasons that they don’t go with this approach anymore. You and I have mentioned a few of them. I don’t think you could give the most recent billion dollar box office movie a small scale dark ride. I think the two scenarios you could do it are with an attraction based on an older golden era film or if they were to open a land with a few attractions simultaneously. But I still think that land would need to include an E ticket and then maybe 2 modern “Snow Whites” at least double the 1955 size.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom