Why I like Aladdin's magic carpet ride, and other things

Walt Disney1955

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Yeah I like it. What can I say? People complain it is out of place in Adventureland and perhaps it is a bit but other than Fantasyland where can it go? It has an exotic feel to it, just like Adventureland in general.

Here is why I like it? The line is rarely long, and it is an attraction. It keeps 50-75 people occupied (riders, and ones in the lines). Maybe that doesn't sound like a lot, but add a few more rides like that and it is. All of the sudden people are spread out a bit more throughout Magic Kingdom. Let's face it, 20 million people were there in 2016. It is about double either one of the other three parks. There is rarely a crowd problem I have experienced at the other three, but there is at Magic Kingdom.

This is why I also like Country Bear Jamboree. It is tucked away, it isn't big from the outside, it doesn't take up a lot of space but 100 people can sit in there every 14 minutes. Why ever get rid of it? Or when Snow White flew the coop to make room for the Mine Train. Why get rid of it? In favour of a meet and greet?

No, no, no. Magic Kingdom for whatever reason operates on a different level than Disneyland. With Disneyland they cram in a bunch of dark rides and it spreads things out a bit. Magic Kingdom has the space but less rides. Anything would help. Adding the swan rides again around the moat for example. So yeah, I prefer them adding more rides, even the sometimes unpopular Aladdin.
 

Cmdr_Crimson

Well-Known Member
I think the only difference is that Carpet and Triceritops has a tilting function compared to Dumbo...
triceratop_spin_001.jpg
http://www./wp-content/uploads/2012/06/dumbo4.jpg t
I'm still just amazed that this ride is more common in Disney...
 

ᗩLᘿᑕ ✨ ᗩζᗩᗰ

HOUSE OF MAGIC
Premium Member
I support your right to an opinion I just don't agree with it. :D Aladdin doesn't fit the surroundings, it's in a horrible location and it's a lame use of IP. Sure it's another ride but it's also another damn spinner. MK needs varying rides; like the retired Swan boats you mentioned. Aladdin deserves a better ride type. Obviously a ride that's open regardless of ride type or IP is better than a ride that's closed or worse, removed. MK needs more rides but I don't think it needs more spinners. Seeing this replaced with something else would be A-OK to me. How can you like this thing!? lol
 

Marc Davis Fan

Well-Known Member
The problem with Aladdin is that it's an amusement park ride in an otherwise-immersive environment. It turns the entire land from "you are in an exotic locale" to "you are in an amusement park." Immersion is what separates Disney from amusement parks, and Aladdin is another step towards closing that gap. I hope it is removed when Adventureland is updated (and preferably much sooner).
 

Walt Disney1955

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
I support your right to an opinion I just don't agree with it. :D Aladdin doesn't fit the surroundings, it's in a horrible location and it's a lame use of IP. Sure it's another ride but it's also another damn spinner. MK needs varying rides; like the retired Swan boats you mentioned. Aladdin deserves a better ride type. Obviously a ride that's open regardless of ride type or IP is better than a ride that's closed or worse, removed. MK needs more rides but I don't think it needs more spinners. Seeing this replaced with something else would be A-OK to me. How can you like this thing!? lol

That's the point. It needs more rides. Don't get me wrong, they ought to be better than Aladdin's spinner, but they are at least utilizing space, which is something they don't do very well at Magic Kingdom. I'd rather have it there than not. Or better yet, I would rather have the narrative that you add more rides than not.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
That's the point. It needs more rides. Don't get me wrong, they ought to be better than Aladdin's spinner, but they are at least utilizing space, which is something they don't do very well at Magic Kingdom. I'd rather have it there than not. Or better yet, I would rather have the narrative that you add more rides than not.
How many more people could fit into the space without the ride?
 

ᗩLᘿᑕ ✨ ᗩζᗩᗰ

HOUSE OF MAGIC
Premium Member
The ride could go and foot traffic to the area would improve but it would also send guests to other attractions thus raising wait-times. This is the crux of Aladdin's Magic Carpets.

I assume a C-D attraction was actually needed in this area, one with minimal wait to offset an E (Pirates) and one that could be tied to an IP. Aladdin was the solution; which worked on paper but in actuality kinda failed. It's flaw was not just an IP that clashed with the land's theming, but also it's ride type AND placement. They goofed all around. I'd like to think Disney knows it's not ideal and are looking to correct it.

Ideas? Worth a discussion for all the armchair imagineers in the forum.
 
Last edited:

Minnie Mum

Well-Known Member
Does MK need more attractions.? Without doubt.
Does MK need more crap attractions like Aladdin? No. They'd be shooting themselves in the foot by damaging their reputation for immersive themed attractions. And Aladdins capacity is ridiculously small. Probably better to build 5 well imagined large capacity rides than 10 small ones like that one.
 

ppete1975

Well-Known Member
I like that it eats people, does it fit the environment... not really. But could anything better fit that area? Speaking of size not quality. They could prob change the paint make it look better and fit the area better, but I doubt they will spend the money. At least it isn't a merry go round.
 

Raineman

Well-Known Member
Yes, but it does so by increasing crowding. The attraction is poorly situated.
To me, this is the most important point about this attraction, regardless of what the actual ride experience is like. Walking through Adventureland at MK, at most points of the day, can be a personal space-violating, claustrophobic experience. The only spot where it widens considerably is the spot that is currently being occupied by this ride-the absence of this attraction would improve crowd flow, especially taking into consideration that both Jungle Cruise and the Tiki Room attractions are within close proximity to this area.
 

JIMINYCR

Well-Known Member
I'd hate to see Aladdin trashed solely to open up walkway space. The point is that without attractions available for guests to wait in lines ands eventually ride... the walkways are filling up with guests milling around searching for something to do. Alladin isnt a great ride, and it doesnt fit but it does attract guests, so its fulfilling a purpose. MK needs more quality rides, certainly those better than Alladin. Theres space available in areas that could be expanded on for rides without having to do another huge land clearing multi year project.
 

ppete1975

Well-Known Member
Now there is a place we could put a spinner..........can you guess.....

DHS

wacky characters

MUPPETS SPINNER each car would be a diff character... each car would do diff things make diff sounds maybe one would shoot bubbles one would make sounds.... even a muppets marry go round.. their wackiness can make any ride zany
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom