DisneyFans4Life
Well-Known Member
Tea is free as wellEve in resorts the ice and water is free, its only soda that is restricted.
Tea is free as wellEve in resorts the ice and water is free, its only soda that is restricted.
What's the alternative? Nobody said it is "OK" to get robbed, but it's never going to be different so trying to make some ridiculous stand over $3 is just going to leave you thirsty or hungry. It's just what it costs everywhere and you complaining won't change it.So as long as EVERYONE is robbing you... it's ok to be robbed. Got it.
I simply disagree with your assessment on pricing and much of it is grounded in facts about business in general. You're making this a Disney issue, but the truth is, EVERY company tests consumer willingness to pay higher prices AND wants to extract every dollar of consumer surplus possible. That's business and it's happening every single day with every single company. I never said it's "right" or "good behavior" but it IS reality. You will never stop companies trying to make money and ultimately, you have thousands of choices. It's called a free market.The argument of 'everyone else is doing it' does not justify poor behavior. Don't you remember that lecture from your parents?
Where would the world be if we didn't hold ourselves to higher standards and instead just accepted the spread of bad behavior as the acceptable norm?
The leapfrog and shadow pricing philosophies are ways you try to convince customers your prices aren't that bad (due to relative comparisons) -- they are not justifications for the pricing.
Other venues charge such prices because they have a monopoly on access and give customers no other options. They test customer's thresholds for tolerance. It's never been seen as GOOD customer treatment, but purely one of testing how far customers will tolerate before revolting.
And unlike other examples.. Disney has many factors going for it that would improve it's margins. Like, shared functions, shared labor, economies of scale on purchasing and stocking, effectively zero rent or facilities charges, etc. Yet, they continue to be a lead in how far pricing can be pushed...
Excellent post. And it's even more at a Cowboys game where you'll see a lackluster effort and a usual home loss during the 3 hours of misery. Cowboys charge $60 for parking and a decent ticket is $300.in comparison the prices arein line if not better than most sporting events that last maybe 3 hours,
you can complain but I don't think concession prices are the place to complain.
typicical sporting event:
decent seat 100 to 150.00
Parking $35.00
Beer now 17.50 for anyhing better than water down beer.
Hot dogs , hamburgers etc off the carts.
Why? Because they are intelligent enough to not smile when getting bent over?
I like your avatar...$3 bottle of water is getting bent over? So you only compare that bottle price to a multi-pack breakdown at the grocery store huh? Yeah, talk about intelligence.
What's the alternative? Nobody said it is "OK" to get robbed, but it's never going to be different so trying to make some ridiculous stand over $3 is just going to leave you thirsty or hungry. It's just what it costs everywhere and you complaining won't change it.
Consumers struggle with margin in general because they are only educated on certain goods. You are getting a "bad deal" on MANY products and services you buy every day or pay every month. You think cell phone or TV service is low margin? How about software from Microsoft? ANY retail clothing? Or that $800 smartphone? Trouble is, consumers only know prices for things they buy at the store. You have very little reference for cell phone service or cell phones because you've always been robbed.
$3 bottle of water is getting bent over? So you only compare that bottle price to a multi-pack breakdown at the grocery store huh? Yeah, talk about intelligence.
You're gonna be a new record for how fast you make the list. Your argument is basically 'You all are stupid' and you back it up with 'you are stupid'. A real winner.
I simply disagree with your assessment on pricing and much of it is grounded in facts about business in general. You're making this a Disney issue, but the truth is, EVERY company tests consumer willingness to pay higher prices AND wants to extract every dollar of consumer surplus possible. That's business and it's happening every single day with every single company.
That's business and it's happening every single day with every single company. I never said it's "right" or "good behavior" but it IS reality
Consumers ultimately have choices in nearly every situation. Disney is not a monopoly. Don't like snack prices? They let you bring in your own. Don't want to pay $3 water? They'll give you FREE water, in a cup, with ice, with a lid.
Clearly, Disney isn't charging enough because record crowds are causing their parks to burst at the seams as they seek further testing of demand based pricing to quell overcrowding.
Kind of funny that people pitch a fit about $3 for a bottle of water at WDW, but yet no one bats an eye at the $5 drinks at your average movie theater. I guess it comes down to what people are exposed to most. A lot of people frequent the movie theater on a regular basis and the pricing is nothing new to them, it something that is pretty much expected at a movie theater. But WDW people only visit once every few years at most, so people are often surprised by the higher prices in comparison to what they normally see outside of the parks.
They don't complain about the movie theater prices because there isn't a forum available to vent about getting "bent over". I totally agree with you though
im at a movie for 2 hours=1 beverageKind of funny that people pitch a fit about $3 for a bottle of water at WDW, but yet no one bats an eye at the $5 drinks at your average movie theater. I guess it comes down to what people are exposed to most. A lot of people frequent the movie theater on a regular basis and the pricing is nothing new to them, it something that is pretty much expected at a movie theater. But WDW people only visit once every few years at most, so people are often surprised by the higher prices in comparison to what they normally see outside of the parks.
Also people have gotten used to smuggling drinks and snacks into movies to avoid the high prices, I don't think its common knowledge that you can bring your own water bottle into the parks and fill it at the nearest water fountain. So a lot of it comes down to the fact that people end up paying extra for their own ignorance of the park policies.
They don't roll over...they are willing to pay it. Some people (like myself) don't care about $3 water or $4 ice cream because we understand it's a way for parks to make money and it offsets the value of the park entry ticket. Disney could charge a more "real" price for park entry while giving you 25 cent water and it would be MUCH higher than today. Disney makes very little on park tickets because of enormous fixed costs, maintenance, and employees.Actually.. but your own argument, if everyone DID do something about it, the prices would change. The problem is when the bulk of customers just roll over the change is seen as accepted and the process repeats.
You did set the tone that if you aren't OK with the prices, then something is wrong with you. People in this thread even go as far as the cliche 'maybe a disney vacation isn't for you'... which basically says "If you care about value, or your money, a Disney vacation isn't for you".
I'm not an uninformed customer - I've done manufacturing, I've done product development, I've done sales, I've done marketing, I've done pricing. I know the concepts in play. And I also know the consequence of 'captive audience'.
Just because you CAN do something doesn't make it the right thing to do by your customers.
Yes Disney has tons of overhead that is not directly monetized and needs revenue from other activities to fund the beast overall. But your HM analogy falls down when you compare Disney against itself. The HM has been there all along, and the model that supported it is generally the same... yet price escalation in things like food have outpaced the rest of the model and Disney's own fiscal results show higher margins. So it's not 'we gotta pay for this overhead' - its 'what can we charge and keep the chart going the correct direction'
You're also getting 2 weeks of fun and value for your money. A movie is 2 hours and you're done. Completely different experience. Same argument if you go to 42 movies over 2 weeks (you could easily do that as the movie is 2 hour).im at a movie for 2 hours=1 beverage
im at Disney for 2 weeks=42 beverages
getting slapped in the face once is no where near as bad as 42 times in a row
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.