Animaniac93-98
Well-Known Member
Neither. They are both unappealing to me.
Someone's hard to please.
Neither. They are both unappealing to me.
DL is so much further than WDW for me and heck of a lot more money on travel but if all things being equal, than I think I would rather see Carsland. I haven't seen either in person (I will see FL is 11 days - yay!) but from what I've seen in pictures and video, Carsland looks like it would impress us the most. I have a boy and a girl so we're kind of split but our whole family loved the first Cars movie. I think RSR, the landscape, and Radiator Springs in general would excite us more.
I've known it from back when it was a parking lot. I liked the cars much better then. Real ones.
For all of its quality, Cars Land is still Disney moving in a direction I resent. Iger's Disney Parks - parks themed to synergise franchises. An entire land based on a cartoon franchise (well, toy franchise that covers the 2-6 boys demograph) is unheard of, and not the direction I would like to see Disney move in to. Gimme BVS instead!
Right. The question specifically said which would you rather do! Why bother answering if your not going to contribute to the questionSomeone's hard to please.
However, Carsland blew me away. The detail is top notch. The rockwork is breathtaking. RSR is a great ride. You don't have to enjoy the movie to enjoy the land, as it, like the movie, are also well-done tributes to Route-66 era and traveling across the country.
New Fantasyland... well. The Magic Kingdom needed the extra space and capacity. The rockwork around Be Our Guest Restaurant and Mermaid is very pretty, but nothing close to the scope of that of Radiator Springs. I already had been on the Mermaid ride and its completely forgettable. A couple of nice animatronics, a great queue (at New Fantasyland), but what else? I can excuse the classic era Fantasyland rides, but in this day and age, having a new ride's story simply just be a cliff-notes version of the movie is about as lazy and uninspired as you can get. There are some exceptions, like the Nemo Submarine Voyage, where the presentation is cool and interesting enough to make it okay. Nemo at Epcot, on the other hand... just an omnimover. No attempt to fit it in with Epcot.
So what else does New Fantasyland have to offer? A nice restaurant. Well, okay, I get that unique and memorable dining experiences are a much bigger part of WDW than DLR. An awkward, overly elaborate meet-and-greet with Belle? Is this really what people want? (no.) What's left? A re-themed barnstormer. Two dumbos instead of one. A kid's splash area. Storybook Circus looks pretty nice but the offerings aren't much different than before.
The worst part of it all is that the grand opening will be even more lackluster due to the most interesting attraction being under construction smack-dab in the middle of everything for another year and a half.
I'm kinda' with you here. Next week I'm going to be seeing DCA 2.0 for the first time since since the Carsland/BVS debut but I'm fully expecting to enjoy BVS over Carsland. I actually don't mind Cars but I feel like I may experience Lightning Mcqueen/Mater/Radiator Springs overload by the time I get into Racers. Then again I might absolutely love Carsland. The detail however looks world class over the computer and detail is my thing. The subject matter though is just meh. We'll see...
We're mostly going to experience a Disneyland Christmas. Never been this time of year. Should be fun
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.