Goofyernmost
Well-Known Member
That can't be right. They flew it there in the 80's so it had to be airworthy at that point. If indeed it was flown there at that time then the engines would have been worth thousands of dollars for rebuild. The placement on display in DHS means that they had no intent of ever flying it again. The only real value it had was the engines and I'm pretty sure they were removed (and sold) back at that time. This was Disney, they were building monorails not long before that era, faking an engine setup would have been simple. They kept the tail number because by then it was known as a Disney plane and they didn't want others using it for multiple reasons. So airworthy without engines would classify as a glider wouldn't it?FTFY
The latest airworthiness date is listed as 1963. I doubt that it'd be considered airworthy without extensive work/inspection/test flights.