Nope, but I'm good enough. I'm smart enough. And doggone people like me.
This isn't a $%&# measuring contest. Your career and/or life experiences aren't connected to the topic at hand no matter how much you want them to be. We're talking about a unique situation involving an audio animatronic figure that is inside a building. I can only assume your building knowledge does not extend to audio animatronic figures inside buildings. If I'm mistaken, I apologize in advance.
The figure has been removed without any down time to the attraction. You're refusal to acknowledge even this is dumbfounding.
There's a phrase my father likes to use about people like you, "Often wrong, but never in doubt." Get off your high horse and come up with a new angle. All you've done is listed your resume and stated people should listen to you because you're an expert. Don't get me wrong, there's a growing mentality in this country about people refusing to listen to experts, but in this case you're not even in the right field. I'm not going to go to a divorce lawyer and ask them an accounting question.
Let's all just step back and chill out a minute (me included). My only true assertion is that a removal would be expensive. Whether that means the yeti can be hauled out without ripping open the mountain or not, I assume such an operation would be expensive. I don't believe anyone has said anything to the contrary. Has it been removed in the last 9 years? Marni and others say yes. Perhaps they are 100% right, but I have not seen strong objective proof. BUT THAT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER. What matters is that it is probably EXPENSIVE to do so, which is why the pathetic hulk is still there. Nobody wants to pony up the crane rental and other costs to haul it out.
My primary assumption is that Disney makes decisions based on logic and common sense, which perhaps is not a wise assumption to make. If the decisions are made logically, and a good company can cut through the apparent departmental junk that gave us Disco Yeti for the last 9 years, my little syllogism makes sense. What can throw my syllogism to the wind? Idiots in power. Undue squabbles. Rampant stupidity. Bureaucracy at all costs. Weak leadership that can't cut through the departmental junk. Take your pickl
By the way, I see divorce lawyers with accounting degrees (and without) make mincemeat of accountants on a regular basis. Most divorce lawyers are not great accountants, but many could do as well as a local CPA. Of course, the real number geniuses are farmers, but that's a whole other topic.
Do you keep mentioning that you helped build a house because you don’t think anyone will come across Wis. Stat. §443.15(1)(a)?
.
Very impressed by your legal research. Well above the call. But I also own two commercial buildings. My opinions are not hugely based on personal experiences wearing a tool belt, but with logic, bureaucratic experience, litigation, running my own business, etc . . .
So let's all chill out. Well played, all. For anyone who cares to stop in, I'm buying Moretti beer outside the pizza window on the Boardwalk on December 27th, at 10:30 pm. LazyBoy, RSox, Marrni, and anyone else, meet you there if you can make it. Look for the pale Midwest lawyer who could stand to lose a few dozen pounds. Good beer can calm the rashest of emotions. And Lazyboy, would you like to pick up a little legal research work on the side?