Either that, or they sent their sense of humor out to the laundry.Clearly you don’t realize every Disney novice, amateur, former CM, and fan is an expert in everything, and each opinion should be logged and then implemented by upper management.
Either that, or they sent their sense of humor out to the laundry.Clearly you don’t realize every Disney novice, amateur, former CM, and fan is an expert in everything, and each opinion should be logged and then implemented by upper management.
Shouldn't it be "Can I not give genuine feedback?"
AS opposed to What?
Almost all messageboards/forums on The Internet are privately owned.
Peoples reaction to this subject always fascinates me.
There are elevated cable gondolas/lifts that have been operating in nearly 60 countries in virtually every conceivable climate and topographic condition imaginable for decades. Last I read, more than 18 billion people have been transported via some kind of cable lift system system since the early 70's in the US alone.
The number of fatalities in the US since then...less than 20. In spite of this so many people seem to think that Disney will need it's own morgue to deal will all of the casualties from the Skyliner.
You are 5 times more likely to die in elevator than on gondola. Escalators kill 30 people a year in the US alone. Where was all this panic when the Land pavilion opened with 2 escalators and an elevator just feet from each other?
Heh. That was my first thought, too.God, I hope Katiebug doesn't ride one...
Why? And why does it matter what they ask?
A person is not bound by a scooter. They can only be used purposefully by someone with independent mobility, albeit limited.
I was originally dismissive of the Disney Gondolas of Death predictions, but I have been looking at the Boeing 737 MAX issues and realized that while no single person will design a system in such a way that it's users have a good chance of dying. In today's massive companies with committee after committee after committee - we can end up with decisions where the actual safety is impacted. Not intentionally but in a thousand little cuts where doing it this way is OK because X will cover it. Then the next committee decides that X can be reduced and so on. It's not an evil intent but a result of systems where no single person can fully comprehend the ramifications of each decision- and furthermore no single person knows all of the decisions and trade-offs made during design and implementation.Peoples reaction to this subject always fascinates me.
There are elevated cable gondolas/lifts that have been operating in nearly 60 countries in virtually every conceivable climate and topographic condition imaginable for decades. Last I read, more than 18 billion people have been transported via some kind of cable lift system system since the early 70's in the US alone.
The number of fatalities in the US since then...less than 20. In spite of this so many people seem to think that Disney will need it's own morgue to deal will all of the casualties from the Skyliner.
You are 5 times more likely to die in elevator than on gondola. Escalators kill 30 people a year in the US alone. Where was all this panic when the Land pavilion opened with 2 escalators and an elevator just feet from each other?
For legitimate concerns...always.Perhaps we should be a bit more forgiving when people voice their concerns about potential safety issues.
I was originally dismissive of the Disney Gondolas of Death predictions, but I have been looking at the Boeing 737 MAX issues and realized that while no single person will design a system in such a way that it's users have a good chance of dying. In today's massive companies with committee after committee after committee - we can end up with decisions where the actual safety is impacted. Not intentionally but in a thousand little cuts where doing it this way is OK because X will cover it. Then the next committee decides that X can be reduced and so on. It's not an evil intent but a result of systems where no single person can fully comprehend the ramifications of each decision- and furthermore no single person knows all of the decisions and trade-offs made during design and implementation.
Boeing would never design a flight system which tried to crash the plane but ..... So Disney would never design a gondola system which would put guests at risk - right?
Perhaps we should be a bit more forgiving when people voice their concerns about potential safety issues.
Except that this isn’t a Disney design and many of the concerns are based in willful ignorance.I was originally dismissive of the Disney Gondolas of Death predictions, but I have been looking at the Boeing 737 MAX issues and realized that while no single person will design a system in such a way that it's users have a good chance of dying. In today's massive companies with committee after committee after committee - we can end up with decisions where the actual safety is impacted. Not intentionally but in a thousand little cuts where doing it this way is OK because X will cover it. Then the next committee decides that X can be reduced and so on. It's not an evil intent but a result of systems where no single person can fully comprehend the ramifications of each decision- and furthermore no single person knows all of the decisions and trade-offs made during design and implementation.
Boeing would never design a flight system which tried to crash the plane but ..... So Disney would never design a gondola system which would put guests at risk - right?
Perhaps we should be a bit more forgiving when people voice their concerns about potential safety issues.
It was assumed to be an add-on by some because it just didn’t work.The way I understood the Boeing debacle is (and I could be wrong...I'm certain I will be corrected otherwise), the safety feature that would have prevented the crashes was an add-on. That would be like optional doors on a gondola.
Boeing CEO was on CBS last night saying "The implementation of that software, we did not do it correctly. Our engineers discovered that."It was assumed to be an add-on by some because it just didn’t work.
As soon as the Gondola's are moving at 35000 feet, don't worry, I will be asking a lot of questions.I was originally dismissive of the Disney Gondolas of Death predictions, but I have been looking at the Boeing 737 MAX issues and realized that while no single person will design a system in such a way that it's users have a good chance of dying. In today's massive companies with committee after committee after committee - we can end up with decisions where the actual safety is impacted. Not intentionally but in a thousand little cuts where doing it this way is OK because X will cover it. Then the next committee decides that X can be reduced and so on. It's not an evil intent but a result of systems where no single person can fully comprehend the ramifications of each decision- and furthermore no single person knows all of the decisions and trade-offs made during design and implementation.
Boeing would never design a flight system which tried to crash the plane but ..... So Disney would never design a gondola system which would put guests at risk - right?
Perhaps we should be a bit more forgiving when people voice their concerns about potential safety issues.
Don't know about that, but, I am a recent possessor of a medical problem that will force me to use a scooter when I get to WDW. I am tired of the implication that people that use them are just faking the need. I can only hope for you that you don't get something that changes your whole life, because having ignorant people judge you is not a pleasant thing. The few that are faking the need, don't know what a pain in the butt those things are and how much you miss because of it. I'll bet they only do that once before they figure out how much effort is involved with using one of those in a theme park. Good backs and legs are a thing that a lot of people take for granted. Not everyone has that good fortune.Clearly, you are not a Wal Mart shopper...
I was originally dismissive of the Disney Gondolas of Death predictions, but I have been looking at the Boeing 737 MAX issues and realized that while no single person will design a system in such a way that it's users have a good chance of dying. In today's massive companies with committee after committee after committee - we can end up with decisions where the actual safety is impacted.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.