Goofyernmost
Well-Known Member
All those IP's that so many complain about are the most likely to keep Disney afloat in hard times, but, it won't necessarily be beneficial to the Parks. That to me is the most vulnerable because it is a one item commodity. It is a fun theme park. One that in the event of hard times will be something that is likely to be the first to be targeted to be crossed of the list of places to spend money if money becomes tight. What will speed it along is the cost of the resort as a whole, not only for Disney to keep in complete working order, but, also something that the public can afford to go to if things get tough.
Those awful Iger IP purchases will be much more likely to prosper because they are much cheaper to operate and cheaper to offer to the public in a manner that they can afford. Marvel, before it became a Disney IP, for example, was surviving without any connection to a park. It was profitable and survivable on it's own and could more easily remain independently solvent without the mind blowing overhead generated by having to operate an entire resort. That might be the only reason that Disney can make it through a tough time financially.
That said, there is also the possibility that like certain restaurants, stores, etc. they can fall out of favor with the public. The public is a fickle mistress. It can all of a sudden become not to be the place to be seen and the South of France once again be the destination of choice for the folks with all the money that want to be seen as socially elite. That was the way it was before, but, Disney grew on the loyalty of those that were not rich enough to purchase a villa on the Riviera. If the big money stops wanting to go there, what will happen to all that stuff that is still good but, has priced itself out of the reach of the common folk? There are no guarantee's in life, especially if it happens to be a theme park.
Those awful Iger IP purchases will be much more likely to prosper because they are much cheaper to operate and cheaper to offer to the public in a manner that they can afford. Marvel, before it became a Disney IP, for example, was surviving without any connection to a park. It was profitable and survivable on it's own and could more easily remain independently solvent without the mind blowing overhead generated by having to operate an entire resort. That might be the only reason that Disney can make it through a tough time financially.
That said, there is also the possibility that like certain restaurants, stores, etc. they can fall out of favor with the public. The public is a fickle mistress. It can all of a sudden become not to be the place to be seen and the South of France once again be the destination of choice for the folks with all the money that want to be seen as socially elite. That was the way it was before, but, Disney grew on the loyalty of those that were not rich enough to purchase a villa on the Riviera. If the big money stops wanting to go there, what will happen to all that stuff that is still good but, has priced itself out of the reach of the common folk? There are no guarantee's in life, especially if it happens to be a theme park.