The Empress Lilly
Well-Known Member
Purposely no water. Until WoL.
East was always meant to be hard lines and straight paths. Designating technology.
West was curved paths and water to designate a more organic and natural theme.
Purposely no water. Until WoL.
East was always meant to be hard lines and straight paths. Designating technology.
West was curved paths and water to designate a more organic and natural theme.
Purposely no water. Until WoL.
East was always meant to be hard lines and straight paths. Designating technology.
West was curved paths and water to designate a more organic and natural theme.
Purposely no water. Until WoL.
East was always meant to be hard lines and straight paths. Designating technology.
West was curved paths and water to designate a more organic and natural theme.
I thought there was some clause in the contract that stated they had to keep LAL somewhere publicly accessible on WDW property. They could do a tasteful design by having the plaques line the overhangs on the sides of the entrance. Then again, no one knows what the new entrance is going to look like aside from the rocks being gone.I'm just wondering if the LAL blocks will be demolished or removed and stored. Flowers and trees are pretty, but not quite futuristic in the Epcot sense (think swooping architecture). Overall, I see it as a way to make up for the lack of attention Epcot has gotten in a few years (festivals don't count), and won't be getting for a few more, when something of substance is added.
The plaques themselves have a clause to be displayed until x date.I thought there was some clause in the contract that stated they had to keep LAL somewhere publicly accessible on WDW property. They could do a tasteful design by having the plaques line the overhangs on the sides of the entrance. Then again, no one knows what the new entrance is going to look like aside from the rocks being gone.
That's what I thought. They can still move them around, right?The plaques themselves have a clause to be displayed until x date.
The plaques themselves have a clause to be displayed until x date.
That's what I thought. They can still move them around, right?
To me, it's more they look ugly and cause interesting traffic flow issues after Illuminations. You have people that'll take the straight path right out of the park but then you'll have the people that'll zig zag through the rocks. This leads to some unnecessary merge points that slows everything down. Sure you have the paths on the far edges of the entrance, but the majority of people go for what should be the most direct and fastest route. Now this isn't like some life or death situation at all, but does slow things down more than it should. I'm all for placing the plaques on the outside edges of the entrance and putting a large planter in place of the rocks. This way people can see where they're going and *should* make things smoother.I think they can move them, but I know quite a few people who purchased those plaques and certainly the expectation is that they will be displayed at the entrance of EPCOT. The last sales took place in summer of 2007, so the implication would be that summer of 2027 (people were told the pictures would be displayed for at least 20 years) Disney could do whatever they wanted. By way of full disclosure, I never purchased a plaque and find them ugly, but this could be a bit of a PR problem. I could see if I had purchased a plaque in 2003, kept track of my contract, took a vacation in 2020 with some family and was told that my plaque was no on display at Everything Pop.......that I would find it a bit off putting.
I think they can move them, but I know quite a few people who purchased those plaques and certainly the expectation is that they will be displayed at the entrance of EPCOT. The last sales took place in summer of 2007, so the implication would be that summer of 2027 (people were told the pictures would be displayed for at least 20 years) Disney could do whatever they wanted. By way of full disclosure, I never purchased a plaque and find them ugly, but this could be a bit of a PR problem. I could see if I had purchased a plaque in 2003, kept track of my contract, took a vacation in 2020 with some family and was told that my plaque was no on display at Everything Pop.......that I would find it a bit off putting.
Strictly speaking, they bought a plaque with the explicit understanding that they would be displayed in EPCOT.I think they can move them, but I know quite a few people who purchased those plaques and certainly the expectation is that they will be displayed at the entrance of EPCOT. The last sales took place in summer of 2007, so the implication would be that summer of 2027 (people were told the pictures would be displayed for at least 20 years) Disney could do whatever they wanted. By way of full disclosure, I never purchased a plaque and find them ugly, but this could be a bit of a PR problem. I could see if I had purchased a plaque in 2003, kept track of my contract, took a vacation in 2020 with some family and was told that my plaque was no on display at Everything Pop.......that I would find it a bit off putting.
To me, it's more they look ugly and cause interesting traffic flow issues after Illuminations. You have people that'll take the straight path right out of the park but then you'll have the people that'll zig zag through the rocks. This leads to some unnecessary merge points that slows everything down. Sure you have the paths on the far edges of the entrance, but the majority of people go for what should be the most direct and fastest route. Now this isn't like some life or death situation at all, but does slow things down more than it should. I'm all for placing the plaques on the outside edges of the entrance and putting a large planter in place of the rocks. This way people can see where they're going and *should* make things smoother.
View attachment 220549
Agreed, I never understood why they designed it to block 80% of the traffic flow and also sight lines around the traffic flow. At least with the smaller planters they had originally, if you walked through them you could see from a distance how crowded a certain area is, now it's all hidden until you're running into each other.
Check it out the next time you are there. The paths and planters in Future World West are curvy and round while the ones in Future World East are jagged with sharp corners.I have been to Disney 15 times and never noticed this.
I think my whole life just changed.
I have been to Disney 15 times and never noticed this.
I think my whole life just changed.
Check it out the next time you are there. The paths and planters in Future World West are curvy and round while the ones in Future World East are jagged with sharp corners.
"which gave an awe inspiring feel to the place"This is what I'm afraid of, that they're going to get rid of these buildings, which gave an awe inspiring feel to the place, as well as being able to get out of the hot sun quickly if you need to, either in the building or under the breezeway. If it turns into a park-like area, Epcot will turn into a hot sweaty place to visit in the summer similar to Animal Kingdom. Yes they wouldn't have to air condition those big buildings, I'm sure that's what they're thinking, but it's really needed there with Florida weather.
Two story buildings has more to do with moving crowds than anything. With the explosion of hoverrounds and strollers, ramps are pretty much the only efficient way to move people to a second floor.. and those take up a LOT of space to get a grade that is ADA complaint. So it's just easier to sprawl.
Also, they could do plenty with the space that is MouseGear. Just as it was a display pavilion before the gift shop went in there.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.