The camera photo location is the same on both Alpha and Omega sides, and I agree that it has a few things that it needs to be worked out. I was cut off completely my second time.
Had a blast on the ride though!
Indeed.....Could and SHOULD.I liked the part where he said it could probably have been better but is still a really good thing. Reasonability for the win!
That is what it seems right... that is weird. As on now, Im not to big a fan of the location. Ill let them tweak it a bit, but if they could take a photo on the track location the goes right next to the lift hill without a flash, that would be a part that always makes me laugh a bit due to the proximity.If it's on a turn are the vehicles facing different directions in the on-ride photos?
There is that hard turn right after that.... seems more appropiate to make it during the actual ride instead of the right before the lift. How silly.Yeah, I think it would make more sense on the lift hill fly by. The only problem is would be light leakage. Could the photo be taken right before the turn?
On California Screamin' the photo is taken during a helix.
While I would have liked more (but not on-board audio), why should they have spent more money?Indeed.....Could and SHOULD.
Why shouldn`t they? Why be happy with just-enough and not with the Disney difference?While I would have liked more (but not on-board audio), why should they have spent more money?
Because it's their money, and if they don't want to they shouldn't. It's not like this is a philanthropic venture, it's a theme park. I would sure as hell like them to pump more money in to the park, and certainly they should keep quality high enough to at least keep their business, but, for the most part, they do. That's unfortunate but true. Disney owes us very little.Why shouldn`t they?
I never said you should be. Go somewhere else and then maybe they should spend more money to bring you back to their product.Why be happy with just-enough and not with the Disney difference?
For better quality? For a new experience? To be unique?While I would have liked more (but not on-board audio), why should they have spent more money?
Exactly.Why shouldn`t they? Why be happy with just-enough and not with the Disney difference?
Yeah, and that's based on TDO's greed.Because it's their money, and if they don't want to they shouldn't. It's not like this is a philanthropic venture, it's a theme park. I would sure as hell like them to pump more money in to the park, and certainly they should keep quality high enough to at least keep their business, but, for the most part, they do. That's unfortunate but true. Disney owes us very little.
I never said you should be. Go somewhere else and then maybe they should spend more money to bring you back to their product.
Exactly.Disney owes its fans, provided that it wants to keep those fans.
As an entertainment company they have set up high expectations - when they fail to meet those expectations, they should expect to lose some of those fans.
Well said.Because it's their money, and if they don't want to they shouldn't. It's not like this is a philanthropic venture, it's a theme park. I would sure as hell like them to pump more money in to the park, and certainly they should keep quality high enough to at least keep their business, but, for the most part, they do. That's unfortunate but true. Disney owes us very little.
I never said you should be. Go somewhere else and then maybe they should spend more money to bring you back to their product.
Well, this is a tough debate. Yes, it is their money and they can spend how they want... but it is our dollar that starts the cycle (ok, if you want to get technical like what came first, the chicken or the egg) it might be their dollar that advertises that gets us there... but at any rate, no I dont think that someone wouldnt go to WDW for vacation due to the SM trains not having onboard audio, but if that trend starts at the smallest detail and no one complains, then more gets cut the next time so on and so forth. Sooner or later, you're biting the hand that feeds you if you arent pushing the limits of guest satisfaction. After all, it is a theme park, but it is suppost to be the BEST.Because it's their money, and if they don't want to they shouldn't. It's not like this is a philanthropic venture, it's a theme park. I would sure as hell like them to pump more money in to the park, and certainly they should keep quality high enough to at least keep their business, but, for the most part, they do. That's unfortunate but true. Disney owes us very little.
That seems like treating theme parks as a service owed, not a service offered.Yeah, and that's based on TDO's greed.
So?Disney owes it's fans nothing!? I doubt that....We are those who follow them, support them. With out us, they have people, still, but those without commitment.
Disney owes its fans, provided that it wants to keep those fans.
I respond to this in a separate post because it's an interesting concept I was thinking about today unrelated to whether or not Disney is obligated to spend more money than they have to.Im not a financial expert, but I just cant see how it would have broken the bank to implemented on-board audio.
Hopefully one day. Like I said, it is a healthy debate.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.