Monty
Brilliant...and Canadian
- In the Parks
- No
Dang! I was trying to sneak up on you... :brick:You have almost reached my level of not knowing anything....:ROFLOL:
Dang! I was trying to sneak up on you... :brick:You have almost reached my level of not knowing anything....:ROFLOL:
"Those who know, speak little"
"Those who know nothing, speak a LOT..."
HAPPY NEW YEAR everyone!!!!
Those who have signed non-disclosures speak little.
As I've said before (even though you claim that you are just "messing around"), I find it quite funny that you call a trust card on an 18 year old when you are a member who has been banned before. Recognizing that fact, I think its fair to say that while you can question who I am, who I may know or what I may know until the end of time, the bigger question of trust will be directed at you and your multiple banned names on this forum (Lewis Carroll for one).
As always, I've got no problem with people questioning me, and frankly, I realize that that is just a formality of the internet, but it is people like Enigma where I personally draw the line. I respect any skepticism coming from members like WDW1974 and others who have been here for a while, or have at least been respectful in their time here, but when it comes to people whom I know are on here under false pretenses to begin with, there is very little trust or respect to be had. I'm not trying to start a flame war, but lambasting me in other threads only to claim that you are just messing around, following up with posts like the above--it sets you apart here. And I believe it was this kind of flaming that got you banned originally. And maybe the second time too... :animwink:
We may now resume discussion of the original topic.
While I trust that an original email may have been sent regarding this topic, I highly doubt the authenticity of the reply itself (not to call anyone a liar, but based on what we have seen, I cannot believe this was a legitimate reply). As for the later replies, I see a few that are jokes and one that seems to be more in line with Disney's protocols.
As always, I've got no problem with people questioning me, and frankly, I realize that that is just a formality of the internet, but it is people like Enigma where I personally draw the line. I respect any skepticism coming from members like WDW1974 and others who have been here for a while, or have at least been respectful in their time here, but
While I trust that an original email may have been sent regarding this topic, I highly doubt the authenticity of the reply itself (not to call anyone a liar, but based on what we have seen, I cannot believe this was a legitimate reply). As for the later replies, I see a few that are jokes and one that seems to be more in line with Disney's protocols.
Just so it is stated here online in public view (because I do intend to send you a PM when I get a chance ... maybe over the weekend or next week), but I do respect you.
I wouldn't be engaging you and asking questions and agreeing with much of what you say if I didn't.
I believe you're one of the most articulate voices here and I am saying that without taking your age into consideration.
When I question you ... well, it's not so much you as TWDC and agendas. And that's all I really feel like saying on that subject here.
But rest assured, while there are folks here I have little respect for, you most certainly are NOt one of them. And I just want to make that crystal clear (more to others than you, who I think gets it).
I haven't really commented on that original 'email' myself because I couldn't stop laughing when I read it ... or at the people who were actually taking it seriously.
I won't call anyone liars here because for all I know that's grounds for being thrown in the dungeon under the MK (or worse, Phil Holmes' personal punishment pit!) but ... I really wonder how anyone with common sense would take such a thing seriously.
Those of us who know how Disney operates well ... 'nuff said.
Happy New Year!
Or...
Those who have signed non-disclosures speak anonymously, and only to those that they trust.:animwink:
Let me say that I recognized your intent from day one, and have not once considered your posts to be offensive. I have cleared my inbox in anticipation of your posts (since I've yet to renew my subscription on WDWMagic, I was 40 messages over my limit), so I'll be ready when you send it. I look forward to hearing from you! :wave:
Its a strange situation to be breaking down such an email, but I feel like (for the most part), it has been figured out... I'm not sure there is really much more to say. :shrug:
True ... but who cares at this point? That's the beauty of places like this ... it can go on forever and ever and ever ... heck, by the time it ends there might actually be construction going on at DAK and we can all throw a party in Rhona's honor!
The ironic part is that (as you know) construction on DAK's next addition was legitimately supposed to begin in 2009. All the time tables are up in the air now.
Maybe we can do what you suggested...just keep talking about this until something (a new DVC hut?) gets built, and we can all rejoice. :lol:
....... :lookaroun
The ironic part is that (as you know) construction on DAK's next addition was legitimately supposed to begin in 2009. All the time tables are up in the air now.
Maybe we can do what you suggested...just keep talking about this until something (a new DVC hut?) gets built, and we can all rejoice. :lol:
(just don't anyone ... it's Disney's best-kept secret!)
If DVCs are Disney's best kept secret I'd hate to see what their worst kept one is.
Bay Lake Towers... Worst Kept Secret EVER!!!
Michael Eisner???? :wave:
Walt is Walt?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.