The replacement bulbs may be still on one of the hundreds of cargo ships moored off the port of Los Angeles (along with other items businesses desperately need for inventory ) not successful to unload their cargo.
Last edited:
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Waterstar Orlando Project
- Thread starter danlb_2000
- Start date
peter11435
Well-Known Member
Hopefully those cargo ships have the ones the Grand Floridian has been waiting on for about 10 years.
10 years? Bit of sarcasm for bulbs to be out that long.
peter11435
Well-Known Member
I wish it was sarcasm. I assure you… it is not.
castlecake2.0
Well-Known Member
What’s the reason that the bulbs on GFlo are all different intensities? I feel the problem isn’t all just burnt out bulbs, but also that the majority of ones that are still functioning are not a standard brightness, adding to the disaster.
Another item of note, riviera has given up on its rooftop “rope lighting” and finally just turned off the remaining segments that were still functioning.
dovetail65
Well-Known Member
I have a home right near there. This complex is behind Texas Roadhouse and no way you would realize that there was stuff behind there. It won't hurt being in the Disney bubble at all in that location
trainplane3
Well-Known Member
Wait, it's main sign facing Epcot is dead already?
I was wondering if it was me but on this previous trip Grand Flo was looking kind of dark at night.
Narcoossee's was quite obviously missing lights:
At least Contemporary got a full replacement of its lights with the refurb:
It was looking quite nice at night.
Agreed. It's Disney's own fault for violating their own buffer zone with AK and AKL so close to the perimeter.
There's no ROI in berms these days.
Unless you put a steak house inside it...
You know... wait for it...
Berm's Steakhouse
We've all seen the Walt Disney clip introducing "The Florida Project" that became WDW, right?
Well, his thing was "In Florida, we'll have the blessing of land." It was something he always regretted about building DL in Anaheim without buying enough land around it to act as a buffer (the suburban sprawl mentioned above) ...
We are now so far from that immersive experience....& people still clamor for yet another mall & more restaurants.
Sorry. I just don't get it.
JoeCamel
Well-Known Member
That blessings of land thing didn't imagine the amount of swamp and wetlands that were unbuildable due to environmental or engineering constraints. For solid ground large enough to build parks and resorts they had to make choices that are proving to be less than ideal.We've all seen the Walt Disney clip introducing "The Florida Project" that became WDW, right?
Well, his thing was "In Florida, we'll have the blessing of land." It was something he always regretted about building DL in Anaheim without buying enough land around it to act as a buffer (the suburban sprawl mentioned above) ...
We are now so far from that immersive experience....& people still clamor for yet another mall & more restaurants.
Sorry. I just don't get it.
The canal system probably could not be built today
Last edited:
Vegas Disney Fan
Well-Known Member
The worst encroachment on WDW is still light years better than the non existant buffer around DL.
I can still spend a week at WDW without ever noticing the outside world beyond the top of a couple hotel towers way off in the distance.
lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
They knew the state of the land and development was supposed to be designed around concentrated pockets.
castlecake2.0
Well-Known Member
Exactly. Until I can see an IHOP from the monorail beam things aren’t too bad.
IHOP can get one a better quality breakfast than at the value resorts anyway of the week.
I wasn't referring to WDW ability to expand. I was speaking to the unbearable ugly sprawl surrounding it & being built right up to its borders. THAT is what Walt Disney saw in Anaheim & had hoped to avoid in FLA.
JoeCamel
Well-Known Member
But then they went and built up to the WDW borders. No point in bemoaning things being built next door when you don't own the land. County approved it
Well, that is WHY I bemoan it.
Disney has had decades to purchase more land around it to create a bigger buffer!
At least they bought this:
www.orlandoweekly.com
Disney has had decades to purchase more land around it to create a bigger buffer!
At least they bought this:
Disney has been on a land-buying spree. Here's why it probably isn't a new theme park
A land purchase by Walt Disney World has rumors flying once again of a new park heading to the resort. Just prior to Christmas, public...
JoeCamel
Well-Known Member
A lot of their recent land purchases have been to offset conservation land they want to developWell, that is WHY I bemoan it.
Disney has had decades to purchase more land around it to create a bigger buffer!
At least they bought this:
Disney has been on a land-buying spree. Here's why it probably isn't a new theme park
A land purchase by Walt Disney World has rumors flying once again of a new park heading to the resort. Just prior to Christmas, public...
castlecake2.0
Well-Known Member
As I said in another thread, until I can see an IHOP from the monorail beam, we are doing pretty well still lol
Correct, they sold off some property to be developed into the final village in Celebration and bought more land behind celebration to make up for it. The land purchases around Reedy Lake are more to protect the buffer around the MK area however.
There’s a plot of land between Bay Lake and Reams road that has gone up for sale, curious to see if they try to get that. Not sure what it’s zoned for but I’m sure they’d want to protect that buffer as well.