MagicKingdom14
New Member
I saw it yesterday!
It's such a cute movie!
Loved it! :sohappy:
It's such a cute movie!
Loved it! :sohappy:
I still need to get all of Pixar's films soundtracks. So much to buy, so little money.
After the story left earth, it fell apart. I just wasn't interested in the humans. I felt the story would have been better staying on earth.
Whew...that makes me feel better.I'm okay with you not liking the last 2 acts.
Because the story of the humans was uninteresting. I felt no attachment to them and could not have cared less what happened to them. If I have no interest in the characters, I have no interest in the story.but how does the story fall apart?
Well, me too...but that isn't exactly what I said, now is it. Why is that the only alternative if the story stayed on earth?Personally, I would get bored watching Wall-E play "Lars and the Real Girl" with Eve for another hour..
For me, it was neither seamless or logical.The story seamlessly transfers from earth to space and back, and that transfer is absolutely essential to the storyline, and logical.
Because the story of the humans was uninteresting. I felt no attachment to them and could not have cared less what happened to them. If I have no interest in the characters, I have no interest in the story.
It's funny how folks are more interested in how you should feel about a movie...instead of how you do feel about a movie.
The second half of the movie was shallow and boring...I lost all interest in what happened, as opposed to the first half, where I was on the edge of my seat and eager to see what happened next.
Just to clarify, I was debating your statement that the story "fell apart," which implies a flaw in the mechanics, construction, craft of the story (screenwriting). I consider "the story fell apart" and "I didn't like the story" to be 2 completely separate statements. Matter of semantics, I guess.
(A big part of that story is about the humans, their condition and their return to earth. It just is, period)absolutely essential to the storyline, and logical.
The story is about the humans as much as Lawrence of Arabia is about the Arabians.
By the way, you contradicted yourself...one minute you say the story that takes place away form earth is:
(A big part of that story is about the humans, their condition and their return to earth. It just is, period)
Then you tell us this:
It can't be both...it has to be one or the other.
My contention is the story that takes place away from earth is not essential to the "love story" we are told the movie is really about. The conflict can easily take place on earth.
You view it as 2 different stories.
No, I don't...which really makes all of our "debate" worthless. You don't want a discussion...you want to tell me what I am really trying to say, and how I really feel.
The final word is yours.
auto could care less about eve but it was probly part of the plan auto made up to make the captian think he was trying. imohoThe story did fall apart...there was a giant plot hole. If Auto's directive was to ensure the humans never returned to earth, why bother even sending the EVE's out on their hunt in the first place.(Which I can gloss over, since it is a cartoon about anthropomprphic hunks of metal and circuits.)
The story also fell apart with the humans...the writer made them uniteresting. They were important to the story that was presented, regardless of what you say, or they wouldn' have been featured in over half the movie. By the way, you contradicted yourself...one minute you say the story that takes place away form earth is:
(A big part of that story is about the humans, their condition and their return to earth. It just is, period)
Then you tell us this:
It can't be both...it has to be one or the other.
My contention is the story that takes place away from earth is not essential to the "love story" we are told the movie is really about. The conflict can easily take place on earth.
In the end, my feeling of the story falling apart is based on opinion and taste...just as your feeling is based on the same thing. Entertainment is subjective. Just because I think the writer did a poor job and failed to tie up loose ends and make characters interesting that take up half of the screen time doesn't make it right, nor is it a matter of semantics. I presented my case clear enough...I don't care if other people agree or not. It does give some insight as to what some folks standards are about "groundbreaking and amazing" entertainment is, and I may think they are wrong, but that doesn't matter in the end, either.
I do too, believe it or not.I just don't agree with them and wanted to discuss the issue so both viewpoints could be seen, because it might affect someone's decision to see the film or not, which I think they should.
Hot, about 100 degrees...no rain. Sucks.Sooo... How's the weather in Denver?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.