News Villains Land Announced for Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom

Jrb1979

Well-Known Member
This was an amazing surprise! Can’t wait to experience this new land.

Also: the Negative Neds in this thread won’t say anything good about Villains land until 25 years from now when Disney is announcing the closure and replacement of its main attractions.
I'm exited for it if the coaster they add is a B&M invert with multiple inversions
 

tl77

Well-Known Member
They could also move Floridian Way and expand further.
They "could" do that, but the cars thing seems like a quick fix to me... and I think if they get rid of that canal they can expand the new Tiana area and stick that Fire Mountain ride out in front of the park between Jungle Cruise and Pirates... at least I hope that's where this is heading maybe 10 years out
fire mt.jpg
 

solidyne

Well-Known Member
Great to see Villains is still in the plans. But, this project will be under *a lot* of pressure. Fans have wanted this for years. And, it'll be impossible to not compare it to what's up the road in Epic Universe. Disney has to nail this land.
Disney "has to nail" SWGE....
Disney "has to nail" Tron...
Disney "has to nail" Tiana's...

Does Disney ever really nail it anymore?

I'll give them the Skyliner.
 

CoasterCowboy67

Well-Known Member
I think this looks 100% awesome. I’d always wished Villains was used for the Dark Kingdom 5th gate, but that won’t happen. This is the next best thing IMO

I do think MK is already so packed with attractions and would’ve left out Cars for that reason, mainly. Maybe the strategy is to make it a 2-day park but that is a very tough sell and ask conceptually. The thing about adding capacity is that they equivalently increase the attendance cap. More space just equals more people allowed in and then you get the same length of lines, but now impossible to see even a majority of the attractions there if you don’t have an annual pass and just have your one day to maximize

Overall, I like Villains at MK and thematically makes so much sense. I would’ve thrown the budget for 2 Cars attractions to 2 more rides at DHS and DAK who aren’t full day parks

As much as I love Moana, worried that adding it to MK feels crazy. Thematically makes sense, just not logic sense to me. I’d rather see them find space for an area themed to Oceania in AK to keep the geography themed lands, or maybe something about aquatic animals. Moana 2 seems to be highlighting a whale, so animals may feature in it more
 

disney fan 13

Well-Known Member
I think this looks 100% awesome. I’d always wished Villains was used for the Dark Kingdom 5th gate, but that won’t happen. This is the next best thing IMO

I do think MK is already so packed with attractions and would’ve left out Cars for that reason, mainly. Maybe the strategy is to make it a 2-day park but that is a very tough sell and ask conceptually. The thing about adding capacity is that they equivalently increase the attendance cap. More space just equals more people allowed in and then you get the same length of lines, but now impossible to see even a majority of the attractions there if you don’t have an annual pass and just have your one day to maximize

Overall, I like Villains at MK and thematically makes so much sense. I would’ve thrown the budget for 2 Cars attractions to 2 more rides at DHS and DAK who aren’t full day parks

As much as I love Moana, worried that adding it to MK feels crazy. Thematically makes sense, just not logic sense to me. I’d rather see them find space for an area themed to Oceania in AK to keep the geography themed lands, or maybe something about aquatic animals. Moana 2 seems to be highlighting a whale, so animals may feature in it more
MK is absolutely not packed with attractions when you compare it to DL which is a smaller footprint.
 

wdwmagic

Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
Original Poster
This is easily the most desperate idea WDI has ever greenlit. It’s got Fantasyland expansion Pt 2 written all over it.
I think it is one of the most obvious ideas that WDI took far too long to do. (well, maybe its a tie with Star Wars land ;))

Villains are hugely popular with guests, and it gives designers a huge amount of scope to work with. Should be good.
 

Spash007

Well-Known Member
It depends on how well they hide the land and how scared this generation of kids is (honestly most of the villains are from 20+ year old IP so possibly they wouldn’t know who they are.)

Little kids are weird. If they’re scared of a toy or book, sometimes you literally have to hide it and tell them you threw it away because they don’t even want it in their house. It’s not enough to put it on a different shelf and say “Oh just don’t play with that.”
Agreed - I’m really hoping that they do have good sight lines figured out
 

trainplane3

Well-Known Member
I think it is one of the most obvious ideas that WDI took far too long to do. (well, maybe its a tie with Star Wars land ;))

Villains are hugely popular with guests, and it gives designers a huge amount of scope to work with. Should be good.
The other big thing is just how Disney villains are truly timeless. Worse case, you can swap out a villain with another but they have extremely good staying power.
 

davis_unoxx

Well-Known Member
I'm really interested to see how far they will go with this coaster. Will Epic push them to make this MK coaster their most intense yet? Or will they play safe with it being located in MK.
Looked like it will have inversions? Disneyland Park in Paris has two looping coasters in their Magic Kingdom Park.
 

JKick95

Active Member
I’m not convinced that’s the way to go. Universal is creating a park exclusively for littles, after all.

In my dream universe Disney would do the opposite and create a gate really geared towards older kids. Maybe put some Fortnite stuff there as well if they have the right. I don’t know that having one older kids area in MK is going to increase interest for otherwise uninterested teens.
Universal is also not very kid friendly compared to Disney.
 

Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Well-Known Member
I am shocked to see Bob approve an entire land not specifically linked to an IP he approved or purchased. I think it’s a huge win for us. I hope vertical construction begins before the next CEO arrives and cancels it.
Interesting to note that Tropical Americas is technically also a land not tied to a specific IP- so if Encanto or Indiana Jones ever become irrelevant, it can be swapped easily. Very cool to see some non-IP-specific lands this year, plus some emphasis on Pirates/Mansion/Country Bears- would be interesting to see them expand some parks original stuff.
 

MerlinTheGoat

Well-Known Member
I am shocked to see Bob approve an entire land not specifically linked to an IP he approved or purchased. I think it’s a huge win for us. I hope vertical construction begins before the next CEO arrives and cancels it.
Bold of you to think Bob won't continue to cling onto his throne until the heat death of the universe. Or that this won't be canned at the first fart of economic downturn, presumably this is way out and won't even begin construction until after the other stuff is done.
 

DisneyHead123

Well-Known Member
Universal is also not very kid friendly compared to Disney.
I guess that’s my thinking - adding a few kid friendly things to Universal didn’t make it a “little kid’s park”. They had to build an entirely new park for that. I think the reverse may be true (Although the situations aren’t entirely comparable because a lot of adults visit MK, and they will love a Villain’s Land. Don’t know if this will move the needle for teens who aren’t already interested in going to MK though.)
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom