Tom
Beta Return
Hold on there mister dramatic sigh.
There are some reasonable concerns that are being flooded by hyperbole here. (On both sides) I agree we shouldn't pass final judgement until it is finished and we check it out in person, but when Disney releases a video and many of the immediate reactions are "that seems a lot smaller than in the movie", there is a discussion that can be had.
Disney can use this feedback for a useful purpose, too. It doesn't have to be taken so personal. "Hey, feedback from the video we posted is that there is a concern for the size of the ballroom. Let's make this alteration to the plans to address that issue."
My questions is, if they are attempting to use forced perspective to push the scale of the ballroom from your vantage point in the restaurant, why on earth are the very first images released to the public from angles that totally break the illusion? My guess is it is to show off the chandelier. Still, you'd think they'd be more careful about that.
I for one am excited to see the end result, and that's why I care about something like this. All the details, including the chandelier and the murals/paintings are all looking awesome. The scale seems to be the only thing of concern at this point.
Not one ounce of "public response" to this media teaser is going to change a single thing they do with the BatB pavilion. If we all write them and say "The dining room is too small," they're not going to tear out walls, rip off the roof, and make it bigger.
It is what it is. Disney doesn't have a gigantic dining room anywhere, except perhaps Ohana (which is pretty gigantic).
This is a behind-the-scenes video. It's not to show what it will look like when finished. It's to generate hype AND appeal to those of us who enjoy seeing things as they're being built. My mom didn't see this video, nor does she even know there's a "media event" taking place at WDW right now - and she's just about as "average person" as it gets.
Only us fans are scrutinizing this stuff and some of them (not "us" because I don't want to be associated with the Debbie Downers) are flailing theirs arms and throwing rotten tomatoes at WDI for something they just don't understand.
Again, as others have said, the ballroom in the movie has no dimensions. It's a giant animated room that grows and shrinks to fit the perspective of the viewer/camera. This is a restaurant in a theme park that is designed to seat X-number of guests at a time. There is absolutely no rule that says it has to be so many feet wide by so many feet long by so many feet tall. To proclaim that "we've been deceived" or that Disney "lied to us about the size of the facility" is about as ludicrous as it gets. Period.