Universal set to unwrap edgy Mummy attraction

Al

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
Universal set to unwrap edgy Mummy attraction
By Todd Pack
Sentinel Staff Writer

February 9, 2004

Just three months shy of its spring opening, Revenge of the Mummy is
part construction site, part thrill ride.

Its maze of stage sets is nearly complete, and a roller-coaster track
coils like a whip through its building on the back lot at Universal
Studios Florida.

But a foam cutout holds the place of a robotic figure in one scene,
and no one passing by seems surprised by the demon warriors springing
from their hiding spaces as workers check whether the monsters are
operating properly.

Universal has a reputation for edgy attractions, but executives say
Mummy, which is entering its final weeks of construction, will be
unlike anything the company has built.

It will take passengers on a four-minute “psychological thrill ride“
that includes a skeletal villain, a roomful of flesh-eating bugs and
a chamber where real flames roil overhead.

A ride as elaborate as this one is “a very complicated thing to pull
together,“ said Scott Trowbridge, vice president of Universal
Creative, which designs attractions for Vivendi Universal's five
parks in the United States, Spain and Japan.

It also is crucial to keeping Universal competitive with its
archrival Walt Disney World, theme-park consultant Dennis Speigel
said.

Competition between the resorts “continues to be an armaments war,
and if you don't come out with a big gun,“ you're not going to
attract tourists, said Speigel, president of International Theme Park
Services, a Cincinnati consulting firm.

Construction on the Mummy started more than a year ago, even before
Universal unwrapped plans to spend $80 million on a pair of Mummy
attractions at its theme parks in California and Orlando.

In fact, an army of artists and engineers had been working on the
attractions since before the movie that inspired them was released in
spring 1999.

That's not unusual.

Ride designers typically start thinking about possible rides several
years out because it takes so long to build them, Trowbridge said.

Some of those ride plans are shelved because the story is weak, while
others are filed away because they would cost too much to build or
there's no room for them, he said.

But building a thrill ride based on The Mummy was “a natural,“
Trowbridge said.

The movie, like its 2001 sequel, The Mummy Returns, is about a mummy,
Imhotep, who returns from the dead and wreaks havoc.

“We thought, 'Here's a story line that's classic Universal,' “
Trowbridge said.

Company officials are careful about what they will say about the
ride. Universal will talk about the making of the attraction but
won't say what happens after the first few scenes, and it won't allow
photos of the work in progress.

One of the first decisions the designers made was to have the
attraction combine an indoor attraction with a roller coaster -- an
idea that had been on the shelf since the early 1990s.

Space Mountain and Rock Rock 'n' Roller Coaster at Disney are indoor
coasters, but Mummy will be different because the coaster is simply
one more twist in the attraction's plot.

Passengers will ride a 1930s-style open “railcar“ and pass slowly
through several scary scenes, stopping for some, before the slow-
moving ride becomes a fast-moving coaster.

But while the designers settled on the coaster idea early on, “it
took a good year to a year and a half to find the beats“ -- the
twists and turns that make up the ride's story, said Jennifer Sauer,
the Orlando ride's creative director.

Sometimes, an idea that works on paper might not play as well in 3-D,
Sauer said.

Ride designers routinely build real and computer models of the ride
to get a clearer idea how it will look to paying guests, she said.

“It really does evolve over time,“ Sauer said.

Several of the proposed scenes in the attraction were so elaborate
that the designers built full-scale mock-ups off-site to see whether
they would really work.

One idea Sauer's storytellers came up with was a room where fire
licks the ceiling.

“Your first reaction is, 'Oh, you can't do that!' “ said Bob Shreve,
a creative producer with Universal.

“Then, the second reaction is, 'Oh, you can't afford to do that,' and
once you've worked all that out, you go, 'Oh. How can we pull that
off?' “

Shreve joined Sauer's team in 2001 and spent the next several months
coming up with a way to create a fire effect that was safe and could
be reset every 24 seconds -- the length of time between cars leaving
the ride's loading platform.

Workers built a mock-up of the room where the effect was planned.
They suspended three pans -- each larger than an SUV -- upside down
from the ceiling. The shallow sides trapped natural gas beneath the
pans.

When the gas was ignited, the flame rolled beneath the pans in an
effect called “brain fire“ because the roiling flames resemble a
brain.

“We played with different heights, different amounts of gas for a
couple days until Jennifer said, 'That's the look I want,' “ Shreve
said.

But they decided to remove one of the three pans because “we kind of
figured out we were truly making a roaster. You could have warmed
your sandwich in there,“ he said.

“We really want people to feel threatened in there,“ but “it isn't as
dangerous as it looks,“ Shreve said.

“You're using lighter-than-air gas,“ he said, and “we built the room
so it can never catch on fire. In terms of guest safety, they're 100
percent safe.“

Passengers will feel the heat, but federal safety guidelines say the
temperature on riders' foreheads can't exceed 111 degrees and can
last only a few seconds -- about the same as opening the door on a
broiler.

Another big decision that the designers had to make early on was
where in the park to build it, Trowbridge said.

“Real estate is obviously a huge concern,“ he said.

The only soundstage big enough was on the park's New York back lot,
but it was home to one of Universal's signature rides,
Kongfrontation, based on the 1976 remake of King Kong.

Despite its aging technology -- the 30-foot gorilla could move its
arms, slowly, but that was about all -- the attraction had a loyal
following.

“But we felt this [Mummy] attraction would be more popular, and we're
all about updating [the park],“ Trowbridge said.

Kongfrontation closed in September 2002, and workers began striking
the ride's New York street sets almost immediately.

The soundstage has about 70,000 square feet of floor space and is
about 55 feet tall, but fitting Mummy into the building created
problems because of the ride's design, said Mike Hightower, vice
president of project management with Universal Creative.

“Everything is right on top of each other,“ he said.

What's more, the stage has only one entrance in the rear for
construction equipment, he said. So, the builders had to install the
attraction like a tourist packing luggage into the trunk of the
family car, making sure everything would eventually fit.

“It takes a tremendous amount of planning to schedule the sequences,“
Hightower said.

Now that the major sets and coaster track are in place, crews will
spend the next several weeks testing the equipment and finishing the
sets before opening the ride intermittently for “technical
rehearsals“ and making any final adjustments.

Universal hopes to have Mummy's official opening sometime in late
spring, before the summer vacation season.

Sauer spent a recent morning in the ride's queue, telling a couple of
workers where to place a broken “stone“ column. It looked to weigh as
much as a car, but they lifted it without much effort.

During a break, Sauer said she had lost track of how long she has
worked on the ride. “I started four, four and a half years ago?“ she
said, doing the math in her head and reacting in mock horror at how
quickly time had passed.




This sounds like it's gonna be one hell of a ride
:D :sohappy:
 

WDWspider

New Member
My next Disney trip I am sacrificing Disney Studios to go to Universal just because of this ride. I'm sure I'm saying exactly what Universal was hoping I'd say. :lol:

If it's as good or better than Spider-man...

:D I'm so excited!
 

CAPTAIN HOOK

Well-Known Member
While I applaud Universal for making attempts to bring it Studios park back on line, is it not "too little, too late"
I know that Universal is capable of producing great rides - Spiderman, Incredible Hulk and Duelling Dragons (to name but a few) BUT Mummy peaked years ago and is almost forgotten.
I hate to see U.S. struggle but I feel MGM has had the upper hand for too long and its going to take more than one ride for that to change around
 

WDWspider

New Member
Originally posted by CAPTAIN HOOK
While I applaud Universal for making attempts to bring it Studios park back on line, is it not "too little, too late"
I know that Universal is capable of producing great rides - Spiderman, Incredible Hulk and Duelling Dragons (to name but a few) BUT Mummy peaked years ago and is almost forgotten.
I hate to see U.S. struggle but I feel MGM has had the upper hand for too long and its going to take more than one ride for that to change around

I strongly disagree here. The Mummy has been a long term Universal mainstay. The ride, especially if well done, will simply re-energize the franchise and still be an attraction that is easily recognizeable.

Gosh, how many dark rides at Disney are based on old classics? Even the Twilight Zone, or the great movie ride, or Star Tours.

I'm honestly not clear on your thoughts here. Are you suggesting they build attractions before the movies come out? Much better to wait and make sure you have longivity and a hit before you invest too much.

Too little too late? Universal has been adding quite a few fresh new rides lately. MIB, Shrek, Nick simulator, and the Mummy are all very recent. Universal is in no worse shape than EPCOT or MGM in terms of new attractions.
 

xfkirsten

New Member
Is this the same one that's going in simultaneously at Universal Studios Hollywood? If it is, I'm there opening day!! :lol: The Mummy and The Mummy Returns are two of my favorite films... saw the second one 5 times in theaters and many many more after I got it on DVD, so I can't wait to see this!

-Kirsten
 

AndyMagic

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by CAPTAIN HOOK
While I applaud Universal for making attempts to bring it Studios park back on line, is it not "too little, too late"
I know that Universal is capable of producing great rides - Spiderman, Incredible Hulk and Duelling Dragons (to name but a few) BUT Mummy peaked years ago and is almost forgotten.
I hate to see U.S. struggle but I feel MGM has had the upper hand for too long and its going to take more than one ride for that to change around
Too little too late?? Like Spider said, Universal's parks are in much better shape than MGM in terms of attractions and how updated they are. Unlike Disney, Universal doesn't let their attractions fall into complete retro eightiesdom. Did anyone see the picture posted with the NYT article? The set is absolutely INCREDIBLE!! I'm there in May.
 

NemoRocks78

Seized
Premium Member
Originally posted by xfkirsten
Is this the same one that's going in simultaneously at Universal Studios Hollywood?

No. USH's RotM will open around June according to some sources. It's being placed in E.T.'s former home of course, so i'm sure it'll be smaller and not as elaborate as the USF version.

Still can't wait for this! It'll be THE best ride! Not too much longer till opening!:D
 

xfkirsten

New Member
Originally posted by NemoRocks78
No. USH's RotM will open around June according to some sources. It's being placed in E.T.'s former home of course, so i'm sure it'll be smaller and not as elaborate as the USF version.

Still can't wait for this! It'll be THE best ride! Not too much longer till opening!:D

In eiter case, I can't wait to see it!! Luckily I get to stick around San Diego this summer instead of going back to WA... so I'll be here for it!

-Kirsten
 

The_CEO

Well-Known Member
* whispers *



Part of the queue.
 

Attachments

  • 11334891.jpg
    11334891.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 299

The_CEO

Well-Known Member
I could show you some other goodies. But, Uni would get really ed.


Day is up - Picture is gone.

** SPOILERS **

Enjoy

This is the scene involving the mummy warriors.

You will be offered riches, for your soul, if you decline... Well.. You know how it goes...
 

MrNonacho

Premium Member
In case you missed the earlier picture, here's a very similar one from the New York Times.
 

Attachments

  • rotm2.jpg
    rotm2.jpg
    56.5 KB · Views: 253

xfkirsten

New Member
Originally posted by Catch 22
Hmmm, well if the MuMMy franchise does really die down then they could always convert it to a Stargate attraction!!!:lol:

Amen to that! NOW you're talking! ;) Being a huge fan of both... I'd take either one! ;)

It'd surprise me to see a Stargate attraction at Universal though, considering that Stargate is an MGM production.

-Kirsten
 

AndyMagic

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by xfkirsten
Amen to that! NOW you're talking! ;) Being a huge fan of both... I'd take either one! ;)

It'd surprise me to see a Stargate attraction at Universal though, considering that Stargate is an MGM production.

-Kirsten

That doesn't mean anything. Any company can buy theme park rights to a movie or show if it hasn't already been purchased. Shrek is Dreamworks and it is in a Universal park. So I suppose there is hope. lol.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom