Universal Puts Disney's Reopening on Defensive

easyrowrdw

Well-Known Member
I agree, but with DVC I'm not sure how realistic that is. Certainly the motel-style and condo-style properties are better suited to minimizing viral transmission than the indoor hallway properties. Our reservation for September is at POR as we considered exterior doors a benefit for this trip.

Oh, yes. DVC is almost full all the time. I figure there's nothing they can do about that. I was just meaning the regular hotels.

That's a good point about the layout of the resorts. That's the values, moderates, and a couple DVC, right? You could maybe throw Poly and the Grand in there with their separate buildings for deluxes.
 
I'm hearing that cast from Pop Century are getting called back, so you may get your wish. My best GUESS at this point is the MK resorts plus Pop.
Called back for when and who? Leadership/trainer roles? Realistically how early would they need to go back to get operations up and running outside of people who need to manage/train other returning cast?
 

Magic Feather

Well-Known Member
The Disney-owned resorts that won’t reopen to the public at the start will Be properties that are mostly isolated from themselves. The main ones I’ve heard thrown around include the All-Stars, both Port Orleans, and Coronado (which appears to be targeted by sports groups).

The other concept to keep some resorts closed is to open 1/2 of the two-part resorts. For instance, if Beach Club reopened but not Yacht, just open 1/2 of the Hourglass Lake complex, if it wasn’t completely closed just opening one of the Port Orleans resorts, etc.

Finally, expect to find a reduced number of rooms/buildings in use. Expect clusters of buildings at Grand Flo and Poly, and really any spread out resort to not open as resources are consolidated.
 

pdude81

Well-Known Member
The Disney-owned resorts that won’t reopen to the public at the start will Be properties that are mostly isolated from themselves. The main ones I’ve heard thrown around include the All-Stars, both Port Orleans, and Coronado (which appears to be targeted by sports groups).

The other concept to keep some resorts closed is to open 1/2 of the two-part resorts. For instance, if Beach Club reopened but not Yacht, just open 1/2 of the Hourglass Lake complex, if it wasn’t completely closed just opening one of the Port Orleans resorts, etc.

Finally, expect to find a reduced number of rooms/buildings in use. Expect clusters of buildings at Grand Flo and Poly, and really any spread out resort to not open as resources are consolidated.

How would that work with them announcing DVC resorts opening on 6/22. Would that mean those are open and the cash side of the resort is closed for those who share properties?
 

easyrowrdw

Well-Known Member
How would that work with them announcing DVC resorts opening on 6/22. Would that mean those are open and the cash side of the resort is closed for those who share properties?

It would seem strange to have Animal Kingdom Villas open, but not the whole lodge. DVC is only, what, one or two floors of Jambo house? I can't imagine they'd operate the hotel with only two floors worth of guests. Plus you have the shared amenities aspect for anyone staying at Kidani. The same goes for Wilderness Lodge with Copper Creek. I think it accounts for a larger percentage of that hotel, though.
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
Interesting. Giving it more thought, it was Easter week of '80. We definitely heard an announcement about it being a record crowd. Perhaps not THE record? It was definitely packed.
I think when you get to the 90s a few thousand more would be neither here nor there! Rather you than me :)

There again “New Years eve 1980” can be taken as 4 months before your visit.
 

pdude81

Well-Known Member
Copper Creek I think is half of Wilderness, but when you add BRV it gets a little higher. I don't know how any of it would work either, so I was asking for clarification. It just seems like DVC makes it impossible to open up half of the "deluxe" hotels as they are more than half of the ones at WDW.

Essentially whether you have 500 or 1000 people using the same elevator every day, it's too many to sanitize in between. So given the doors are more than 6 feet apart I don't see limiting the number of guests in a hotel making a huge difference in risk. So in going back to the idea of closing resorts rather than limiting capacity at resorts, I think that could make sense. It's just ugly picking which people's vacations you cancel
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom