WDWFREAK53
Well-Known Member
I feel like I can't give a dad joke a like, even though I desperately want to.
I feel like I can't give a dad joke a like, even though I desperately want to.
Resisting the "Like" is a boulder approach.
I feel like I can't give a dad joke a like, even though I desperately want to.
I feel like I can't give a dad joke a like, even though I desperately want to.
I feel like I can't give a dad joke a like, even though I desperately want to.
BSG doesn’t translate very well to a theme park.I'd say 70% of the public only knows BG from its 1979-1980 incarnation and not the much better cable version. The original BG rapidly deteriorated into a truly awful sci-fi show.
The themes of the lands also compliment each other well as opposed to being completely unrelated which we see in Epic Universe and all of the recently built UAE parks (which look terrible and soulless). The original lands for Islands of Adventure were cohesive in concept, with only Jurassic Park being the outlier and the rest being havens for fictional characters from literature. Potter wasn't necessarily a huge departure since they were, in fact, books, but Kong was.
Also I'm aware that Jurassic Park was a novel, but the land doesn't follow the format of the others and is literally Jurassic Park - the park.
My point was not that they were literature based but that they created fictional "havens" for fictional characters as the lands. They created a new world to explore even if the world was filled with IP, because they weren't just recreating ONE specific location from ONE IP. That is how IOA differed from these new parks even if it's still a "grab bag" park.IOA's theme is adventure, the port of entry being the way into this world of Adventures (And there's specific references to this theme all over Port of Entry if you look for it). It never was literature, although a lot of them did have a connection.
Nice work...I went and did 2 quick mocks of the concept art combined with google maps (one to show distance/scale in comparison the existing parks, one to show a little more detail on placement. They're not perfect, but meant as approximations):
View attachment 396063
View attachment 396064
I agree with what you are saying, but, to me, it’s equally as ridiculous to claim that this new park will probably be the best theme park out there based upon some concept art and a press conference.
I'd say 70% of the public only knows BG from its 1979-1980 incarnation and not the much better cable version. The original BG rapidly deteriorated into a truly awful sci-fi show.
I have no idea when the newer version was on TV. I only know the original and it wasn't great.
By all means, rent (if you can) the remake. It is awesome. And its so well written even the United Nations used it for a symposiumI have no idea when the newer version was on TV. I only know the original and it wasn't great.
This park is all about franchise lands. That means no stand alone attractions.Thought/Observation: Could the Space themed building and adjacent dueling coaster be a part of a sci-fi city land like in Universal Singapore? Perhaps the coaster will still be themed to Star Trek in a ride that pits the Federation against the Klingons via a warp coaster.
IMO Universal could be better off going with themes vs. all IP’s. They just don’t have a lot of IP’s besides Nintendo that I want to see a whole land based on. Do we really need a whole land based on Fantastic Beasts, life of Pets, or Dragons?This park is all about franchise lands. That means no stand alone attractions.
I'm curious, as a non-super coaster fan (really wish i could handle them), will there be a good balance of super thrillers (ala Hulk) and dark rides/less intense coasters?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.