Jrb1979
Well-Known Member
I have no issue with that ride. In fact not many places have it so it's unique to FloridaI said it had a better coat of paint did I not? It needs a dark ride I’d much prefer that to the 6 flags spin thingy
I have no issue with that ride. In fact not many places have it so it's unique to FloridaI said it had a better coat of paint did I not? It needs a dark ride I’d much prefer that to the 6 flags spin thingy
There's some nice detail work, but my lord was there a sale on nets and tarps? Those don't age particularly well and I'm bothered by their use in Monsters and extensive use in Dragons. I get why they're used, but better design should not necessitate the nets and tarps. While we'll certainly appreciate more shade, I think the tarps will just be regrettable obstructions at night.Isle of Berk looks almost completely skippable to me -- the attraction lineup and the land itself looks quite bland, other than the stage show -- but it's nice to see themed costumes tying into the location like Disney used to do.
That's been my take here, too.For me, I think HTTYD is going to be a sleeper hit. The rollercoaster is long and interacts with the land really well. If the show is like Beijing's, then it is going to be great. Fyre Drill is just a fun water ride that doesn't have a height requirement like most water rides etc. Dragon's Racer Rally may be a flat ride but that doesn't mean it's a kiddie ride. Those kinds of rides are quite intense and it has a a higher height requirement that the coaster. Add in the Mead Hall and the playground, and this land is really well-rounded
For me, I think HTTYD is going to be a sleeper hit. The rollercoaster is long and interacts with the land really well. If the show is like Beijing's, then it is going to be great. Fyre Drill is just a fun water ride that doesn't have a height requirement like most water rides etc. Dragon's Racer Rally may be a flat ride but that doesn't mean it's a kiddie ride. Those kinds of rides are quite intense and it has a a higher height requirement that the coaster. Add in the Mead Hall and the playground, and this land is really well-rounded
I think it'll be successful -- I just personally don't think it looks good at all other than maybe the show. But they don't need me to like it as long as most people do; I think Toy Story Land is awful basically all around and it's definitely been a success for Disney.
I think it looks amazing and I’m excited for the show and the flying dragons just needs a dark rideI’ve heard from several current UC folks - more than one who also worked on Toy Story Land (there's plenty of cross-pollination between WDI and UC) - that HTTYD is absolutely on par with something you’d expect to see in Fantasyland at MK. There’s a lot of crossover between WDI and UC, and everyone I’ve talked to seems to agree on the quality.
Universal Orlando has released a new Epic Universe commercial:
Isn't this the same one that was released last year?
I’ve heard from several current UC folks - more than one who also worked on Toy Story Land (there's plenty of cross-pollination between WDI and UC) - that HTTYD is absolutely on par with something you’d expect to see in Fantasyland at MK. There’s a lot of crossover between WDI and UC, and everyone I’ve talked to seems to agree on the quality.
I get that, but i also think the theme lends itself to be adapted into a fantasyland style land if needed.I'm not even suggesting the quality is bad. I think it's just an example of how single IP lands can be problematic. I have no connection with the IP and it doesn't look impressive or interesting to me even if it's well-themed in the context of that IP.
The attraction lineup is a separate thing -- the attractions look boring to me regardless of whatever IP is or isn't attached -- but that's kind of par for the course for Universal for me. The current Universal parks only have a handful of attractions that I think are good. Again, though, they don't need me to like it; plenty of people do!
Universal Orlando has released a new Epic Universe commercial:
This isn't new - thanks to @Animaniac93-98 for the note.
I feel basically the same way in large part because I don't have any connection to the IP. It all looks like it is probably well-themed to the IP, but the IP is more a barrier than an entry point for me as I haven't seen any of the films so don't really know any of the references.I'm not even suggesting the quality is bad. I think it's just an example of how single IP lands can be problematic. I have no connection with the IP and it doesn't look impressive or interesting to me even if it's well-themed in the context of that IP.
The attraction lineup is a separate thing -- the attractions look boring to me regardless of whatever IP is or isn't attached -- but that's kind of par for the course for Universal for me. The current Universal parks only have a handful of attractions that I think are good. Again, though, they don't need me to like it; plenty of people do!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.