The Pho
Well-Known Member
I’m not sure I’d say it’s difficult to disguise the land that way. It would just be an indoor land. I know the visuals change quite a bit with the era, but I really don’t think the era would be the draw. A slightly different situation, but a lot of people will be going to Galaxy’s Edge to see the Falcon not to see Batuu or the sequel era, although most will go because Disney and/or Star Wars.I think that would work a lot better as an attraction than an entire land. It would be hard to disguise a theme park land (which is typically open) as a space ship. The stylistic differences between OS and NG are massive. I would expect them to go with the 2009 reboot style which most fans would probably be okay with. But that movie series appears to be on life support if not already dead.
Since the Enterprise is a larger ship than the Falcon building it life size or near would be harder and more expensive, much easier to showcase it from the inside, which is kind of what Disney did for the Falcon, just with an attraction, we see a model but get to explore some of the ship as part of the line. But a larger ship could function as much more than a single ride.
I’m just saying that the focus of Star Trek has pretty much always been “the voyages of the Starship Enterprise” not the places they went, so that’s what people would want to see. Whereas Star Wars has the focus of “a galaxy far far away”
Then again, Hogwarts was the obvious choice for a Harry Potter Land and it was relegated solely to a ride, when it could’ve been so much more. And that land still turned out great.