lebeau
Well-Known Member
But back to the future is getting a musical next year just saying even if it’s not coming to the fourth park the franchise is timeless. Just my opinion. Not everyone agrees I know.
Don't get me wrong. I like those movies. When I was a kid, I loved them. They were two of my favorite movies of all times when I was a teenager. But that was over thirty years ago. They aren't terribly relevant any more. Most people going to Universal will have no idea there's a Back to the Future musical. I'm a fan and this is the first I am hearing of it. Yes, there is going to be a Ghostbusters reboot, but I don't think Universal wants to gamble an entire land on that being a hit. Especially after the last reboot. Maybe, if it's a smash, it will be incorporated into the parks at some point in the distant future. But the odds are really slim.
(Sidenote: On my blog I write a series called Let It Die about franchises that I think are better off left alone. It's a relatively young series without a lot of entries, but I have covered both Ghostbusters and Back to the Future.)
I am super excited for the Universal Classic Monsters Land and those guys are old as dirt. So it's not about age. It's about relevance and how likely these properties are to be relevant in ten years. Or twenty. The "future" in Back to the Future was four years ago. That's not the definition of timeless no matter how great the first movie was. And Ghostbusters may have a moment when the new movie comes out. But unless it catches fire in a big way, people won't be clamoring for a Ghostbusters land. The HHN house will be nice for fans though.