Universal Creative VP Taking Over WDI Development

KingStefan

KingStefan

Well-Known Member
OK, the more I read about this guy, the more I realize he's a film expert, especially 3D films and special effects. There's been a lot of talk about coasters, but that is not his backround. Maybe Disney wants him for that expertise, not to make WDW into a thrill park. Ya think?
 
jmvd20

jmvd20

Well-Known Member
KingStefan said:
OK, the more I read about this guy, the more I realize he's a film expert, especially 3D films and special effects. There's been a lot of talk about coasters, but that is not his backround. Maybe Disney wants him for that expertise, not to make WDW into a thrill park. Ya think?
Click to expand...

This thread lost its way a several pages ago. No one is saying that he will turn WDW into a thrill park. The thrill ride talk just started when it was brought up that he was the lead guy on Spiderman, that in turn started the thrill rides discussion and then... mayhem... confusion... and panic... :lookaroun

Anyway I think this move will bring good things to Disney, but of course only time will tell for sure.
 
KingStefan

KingStefan

Well-Known Member
The more I learn about this guy, the more I an convinced of the same thing, jmvd20.

Spiderman, although I have never ridden it, seems like just the kind of ride that would fit into Disney. It is not a coaster (at least I don't think it is). It is more like the kind of ride that people have been clamoring for at WDW on these boards. Am I wrong, everyone?

BTW, did you know that the same company that did the film and effects for Spiderman did HIStA? Scott chose them for Spiderman, and by all accounts it was a good decision. I think his relationship with that company is a valuable asset in his favor for Disney hiring him.
 
wedway71

wedway71

Well-Known Member
Universal=Instant Thrills.
Disney =Life long memories.

Wonder how he will come to play.

I dont worry about him making Disney a Thrill park ,but am excited since hes coming from Disney's biggest competition-always a big plus to draw ideas from a company that keeps you on your toes.
 
jmvd20

jmvd20

Well-Known Member
KingStefan said:
The more I learn about this guy, the more I an convinced of the same thing, jmvd20.

Spiderman, although I have never ridden it, seems like just the kind of ride that would fit into Disney. It is not a coaster (at least I don't think it is). It is more like the kind of ride that people have been clamoring for at WDW on these boards. Am I wrong, everyone?

BTW, did you know that the same company that did the film and effects for Spiderman did HIStA? Scott chose them for Spiderman, and by all accounts it was a good decision. I think his relationship with that company is a valuable asset in his favor for Disney hiring him.
Click to expand...

I have never ridden Spiderman though from what I understand it is a dark ride that uses 3-D and special effects.

First ever combination of moving, motion-based ride vehicles, 3-D film and live action.
This simulator ride's set encompasses 1.5 acres including a virtual 400 foot freefall experience.
Click to expand...

400' virtual freefall sounds pretty neat to me!

The more I am finding out about this guy the more I like this news. Hopefully they will let him create new things and not tie his hands on the issue.
 
the-reason14

the-reason14

Well-Known Member
mary219 said:
I didn't read through the whole thread ,but perhaps with mgm gone-disney studios can in some form be a thrill ride type of park like IOA?that would be good ,yes or no?
Click to expand...

IMO that would be good. Probably not just like IOA with thrills thrills thrills, but a mixture of darkrides and family/kiddie rides, but more on the thrill. MGM already doesnt have alot for kids, and I think since it already has one of the best thrill rides on property tot and the other decent thrill ride rrncc that it just add on to the thrill ride mania. Thats JMO.
 
fireworkz

fireworkz

Active Member
Little late coming into this thread, but a thought on Disney Style Parks vs. Coaster Parks and the attendance and money they bring in overall... consider Nintendo's recent strategy to focus on being accessible and fun to all, not gamers only. That has brought them back to the #1 game system after being #3 for years. It boils down going after a broader, larger audience. Disney knows this strategy well.
 
mkt

mkt

When a paradise is lost go straight to Disney™
Premium Member
ImaYoyo said:
Not working one of the many "Screaming Fans" shifts tonight?
Click to expand...
Why? I'm no longer living in the US ;) The only thing I've done tonight is eat pork tenderloin, drink 2 glasses of Sauvignon Blanc, and type up some classwork.
 
J

Jose Eber

New Member
^^^ Aah the blessings of family.

I have ridden Spiderman, and its tres cool. A little intense, but very well done for a young adult ride. The big technical hurdle there was making the 3D work on a moving vehicle. NOT easy.

All I'm saying is that true entertainment is broad. That means ages 0-100 can enjoy it. Let's face it, not everyone can handle the scares of TOT or intensity of M:S.

Why do these new Disney rides have to be intense all the time, or severely boring? (Stitch and Laugh Factory=boring imo).
 
KingStefan

KingStefan

Well-Known Member
jmvd20 said:
...400' virtual freefall sounds pretty neat to me!...
Click to expand...

Yes, that sounds very cool! From what I've read, the simulator vehicle moves only inches, but it really feels like you are falling. When the guy who created that scene rode it for the first time he said that even though he knew exactly what was going to happen (of course, he created it) he was much more scared than he expected. Now that's saying something.
 
I

I-4Warrior

New Member
If Disney management brought this guy in, they must be quite confident that he's familiar and comfortable with the existing philosophy of the parks, and must be equally confident that he won't try and change it, but rather will add to it. I think people see "Universal" and start thinking he's going to turn Disney into a clone. They wouldn't have hired him if that's the case. Despite what a lot of posters seem to think at times, Disney management knows a little more about how to run a business than most.
 
paul436

paul436

Active Member
PhilharMagician said:
If you were to ride Dudley & Splash blind folded then Dudley would win, but open your eyes and splash is by far superior. Splash was the largest and fastest when it was build in the 80's. A lot has happened since then, but splash will always have better show!
Click to expand...
I have to agree completely on this point. Dudley is a great ride and I would ride it every chance I got but Splash Mountain is simply magical to me. It takes me to a different place.
 
paul436

paul436

Active Member
Jose Eber said:
Why do these new Disney rides have to be intense all the time, or severely boring? (Stitch and Laugh Factory=boring imo).
Click to expand...
I thought the Laugh Factory was pretty entertaining but Stitch was awful. I went on it for the first time this past August but can't see myself going on it again.
 
djkidkaz

djkidkaz

Well-Known Member
Everyone is thinking that Disney lured him in to their company, but who's not to say that he wasn't tired of building thrill rides and wanted to open up to a more broad appeal of family friendly AND thrills and maybe he came to Disney. Just a thought.
 
brisem

brisem

Well-Known Member
djkidkaz said:
Everyone is thinking that Disney lured him in to their company, but who's not to say that he wasn't tired of building thrill rides and wanted to open up to a more broad appeal of family friendly AND thrills and maybe he came to Disney. Just a thought.
Click to expand...

It could have been because there's a lot of uncertainity at Universal, since it's up for sale.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom