I think the keyword is immersive. When I go to a Universal park, I think "Ooh, let's ride the Jaws ride, or maybe the Dudley Do-Right flume". To me, Universal is a nice one day excursion that is and always will be a "Theme Park". It clearly is made of rides and dining, and shops and such. Disney is a "World", and that's what I love about it. I forget my troubles, and go to places I normally would never encounter. Disney uses theming to their own advantage, creating lands that fit, where as (especially U.S) Universal is simply a collection of rides themed to "movies". Don't give me crap about how The Simpsons Ride is justified next to Men in Black or Jaws, their theming and placement stinks. The rides indivually are okay, but as a park, don't do it, and the same can be said for the theme parks. Essentially, the rides in either park can be switched, as they both simply use movie franchises. Disney's parks are balanced, Fantasy and magic, education and innovation, movies and hollywood, and Animals and discovery. They don't overlap like Universal. I also feel kinda cheated at Universal at the end of the day, I left an Amusement Park, not a theme park in Orlando, the theme park capital in the world, I saw no fireworks or themed parades, no surprises, and I still managed to think about the outside world and all it's problems, not to mention the price gouging (which Disney does without my knowledge =)). People complain about Disney being old, and not cutting edge, but who said that cutting edge attractions were the best? Besides Spiderman (which IMHO, still doesn't make me feel as alive as TOT), what attraction really blows the pants off Disney, none. Disney's continued use of magic, nostalga, and "cutting edge" technology and creativity will keep me coming back every year, whether or not the parks are 30 years older than Universal's.
(Umm, I don't post much so I guess I got carried away

)