I think it is interesting they aren't willing to cooperate with police.:brick: :brick: :brick:
It was reported up here on the news, and I heard it from the same place I heard the original part of the story.
I'm waiting for one of the local stations to post it so I can give a link.
I will have to agree to disagree. Guns do not lead to violence per se; there have been those who prey upon others since the beginning of time.
When their numbers increase to the point that the average citizen feels at risk, then the law abiding citizen gets a gun, and legal gun ownership increases. The bad guys always had them, not the other way around. The increase in LEGAL gun ownership in some areas is a response, not a cause.
A friend's son was stabbed to death with a kitchen knife after a disagreement in a movie theater. Another acquaintance's daughter was also stabbed to death in her doorway. I still have knives in my home. IMO, (and only after watching humans for 5 decades) guns just make committing crimes easier for some , they don't cause people to be criminals in the first place.
BRAVO!:sohappy: Very well put.
And I would like to add to Mikester71 that I am offended by your "consititution or whatever" comment. I think that is very flippant remark. I don't think anyone here US citizen or otherwise thinks that US laws or government are perfect, but it is really rude to just dismiss them like that. Then you go on to say something is just your opinion and go on to say "If there were no guns allowed in the hands of regular citizens, you would have way less people dead in the world, and that's a fact!"
I am no big advocate of guns, but those two people do a lot to prove that horrible things can happen without guns and just having the police and military armed is not necessarily always a good thing.
I'm sorry to all if this got off topic, but I was really offended by those remarks.
Funny you would bring those two up...if you were to think of it. Those countries did not have legislation allowing there respective citizens to be armed and carry weapons for personal use. Therefore making there populations alot easier to oppress... ...which it is my belief (and I could be very wrong) that our founding fathers put this into our "constitution or whatever" in order to prevent the oppresion of it's people by our own government or any others goverment (hence why you are also allowed to have militias, and not have to forcefully quarter any troops, etc.) Maybe such far foresite wasn't there on their part, but I believe they could actually see were this path might have lead if these rights were never gauranteed. IMO But like I said I could be wrong.
I seriously doubt that you will find one single person in this thread that is a big fan of violence or war. Sometimes they are necessary to stop evil, and wrong doing. Funny when I think of militia I think of the Minutemen, and the National Guard. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and I respect yours.Again, sorry about the "constitution or whatever" part. It was late, I was tired, and I honestly forgot what you guys called your bill of rights, hence the "whatever" part. I meant no offence by it.
I am just not a big fan of violence or war and believe that there are other actions that can be taken before resorting to force. I believe Hitler would have still done what he did even if German citizens were allowed to be armed. He was a madman who would have stopped at nothing to gain more power.
I don't see militias as a good thing either. I usually think of guys like Timothy McVie or Terry Nicholls and the actions they took against against your government in Oklahoma as showing what SOME militias will and can do. Again, these are just my beliefs. Doesn't mean they are correct or incorrect, just that they are mine.:wave:
I didn't mean anything by that comment. If you notice the time of my post (it was late - early, however you look at it) and I had a brain fart. I just couldn't remember what you Americans called your main laws off the top of my head (Constitution, Bill Of Rights). I know in Canada, we have a Constitution too, but I have heard it referred to as The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and I wouldn't expect everyone to know that, even some Canadians. That is all I meant by the "whatever" part. Like I said, chalk it up to tired stupidity, but nothing more.
I know, but guns (weapons) still played a big part in their reign of terror. Wars are fought with guns and guns killed innocent civilians by the millions. Hitler also took his own life with a 7.65 mm Walther pistol.
I just don't see any benefit or upside to civilians owning guns. Sorry:shrug:
Again, I didn't mean to sound offensive by any means.:kiss:
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.