ChrisFL
Premium Member
I'm guessing it's a sponsorship deal, wonder if there's an expiration date or what happens if the crypto goes belly up (not like that ever happens these days)
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
News Tron coaster coming to the Magic Kingdom
- Thread starter wdwmagic
- Start date
I'm guessing it's a sponsorship deal, wonder if there's an expiration date or what happens if the crypto goes belly up (not like that ever happens these days)
dovetail65
Well-Known Member
I beliee Disney meant that statement in the the way Tron could be a landmark Iconic Symbol Coaster for a Park just as as Space Mountain has been for Magic Kingdom from the beginning. They didn't mean it in a way that Tron was to mimic, copy or be an upgrade of Space mountain.
No matter what their initial intentions were it is clear Cosmic Rewind is the attraction that "might" be said to be an updated Space Mountain. I believe that if they had the tech back then Space Mountain could of been very close to what Cosmic is. From my viewpoint Tron was designed from the start for the less adventurous guest, not the Space Mountain/Cosmic Rewind guest.
I for one wont even go on Space Mountain anymore as now I have something cool, but not as aggressive Space Mountain or Cosmic rewind. I can ride Tron as as I age. Space Mountain I am already at the point I do not want to ride and very close to I can't ride if I wanted to. Cosmic because it is smooth I may get a few more years to ride, but it does take a bit out of my body and head already.
No matter what their initial intentions were it is clear Cosmic Rewind is the attraction that "might" be said to be an updated Space Mountain. I believe that if they had the tech back then Space Mountain could of been very close to what Cosmic is. From my viewpoint Tron was designed from the start for the less adventurous guest, not the Space Mountain/Cosmic Rewind guest.
I for one wont even go on Space Mountain anymore as now I have something cool, but not as aggressive Space Mountain or Cosmic rewind. I can ride Tron as as I age. Space Mountain I am already at the point I do not want to ride and very close to I can't ride if I wanted to. Cosmic because it is smooth I may get a few more years to ride, but it does take a bit out of my body and head already.
Last edited:
No Name
Well-Known Member
I imagine the company that recently misspelled “site,” “permission,” and “Bedford” in one sign might just be capable of a mistake.
lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
It wasn’t just an after-the-fact description. It was the starting point.
Casper Gutman
Well-Known Member
We’re at that phase of a new ride opening where criticisms that have long been accepted as obvious even by defenders (who choose wisely to fight on other, more defensible hills) must be attacked. Tron is horrendously placed and far too similar to Space. It may arguably be fun, exciting, aesthetically enchanting, a worthy addition to the Magic Kingdom - but it is still horrendously placed and far too similar to Space.
Dark rides are an entirely different matter. They should be viewed as a medium, like film, that can serve an endless variety of stories in every possible genre. They emphasize tone, mood, narrative, visual and audio style, etc. and in doing so offer huge range for creativity. Saying MM is like HM may be true to the extent that Fast 9 is like My Dinner with Andre - they’re both films, but they differ in every other significant way to the extent that the original statement is meaningless.
Theoretically, all this is true also of dark-ride/ coaster hybrids. They have certain inherent limitations- most obviously, they tend to be shorter and feature a much heavier emphasis on physical sensation that fights for focus with storytelling elements. But some coaster hybrids have clearly overcome and/or taken advantage of these limitations - notably Thunder and Hagrid. This makes the indictment of Disney’s string of incredibly similar sci-fi-y coasters in a box even sharper. They make no effort to be significantly different. They’re coasters in the dark, with vague, impressionistic lighting effects - even GotG, which tries and fails to emphasize story to a more significant degree. It’s a shocking failure of imagination.
Dark rides are an entirely different matter. They should be viewed as a medium, like film, that can serve an endless variety of stories in every possible genre. They emphasize tone, mood, narrative, visual and audio style, etc. and in doing so offer huge range for creativity. Saying MM is like HM may be true to the extent that Fast 9 is like My Dinner with Andre - they’re both films, but they differ in every other significant way to the extent that the original statement is meaningless.
Theoretically, all this is true also of dark-ride/ coaster hybrids. They have certain inherent limitations- most obviously, they tend to be shorter and feature a much heavier emphasis on physical sensation that fights for focus with storytelling elements. But some coaster hybrids have clearly overcome and/or taken advantage of these limitations - notably Thunder and Hagrid. This makes the indictment of Disney’s string of incredibly similar sci-fi-y coasters in a box even sharper. They make no effort to be significantly different. They’re coasters in the dark, with vague, impressionistic lighting effects - even GotG, which tries and fails to emphasize story to a more significant degree. It’s a shocking failure of imagination.
DavidDL
Well-Known Member
@egg; Sure, images can be cherry-picked. Yours is an example of the extreme opposite; an under construction photo from a vantage point pretty much only viewable to those climbing the treehouse and zooming in with their camera or staying at the Contemporary Resort. But as the Skyway has taught us; any attraction/location that offers views from on high is always going to reveal some backstage that we're not "meant" to see.
I'm not trying to say that Disney gets sightlines correct 100% of the time. They absolutely don't. I think Guardians of the Galaxy is probably one of the most egregious examples of this I have seen in recent years. That said, I don't think the image you shared is what "most" Guests are going to be seeing. Most Guests walking up are going to have a ground level view that looks more like this:
Is the show building still slightly visible in this example? Sure. But no where near the issue your original image made it out to be.
But I'll be fair, too and say that there definitely is an area Disney needs to improve the sightlines for day Guests and that would be the Storybook Circus/Barnstormer:
While one could make the argument that only small children and their families waiting in line for Barnstormer would be subject to this view (thus being less likely to notice or care), I don't think that's a proper case to be making. This view in particular absolutely should be worked on and could absolutely be simply fixed with some more stinkin' (taller) trees.
I'm not trying to say that Disney gets sightlines correct 100% of the time. They absolutely don't. I think Guardians of the Galaxy is probably one of the most egregious examples of this I have seen in recent years. That said, I don't think the image you shared is what "most" Guests are going to be seeing. Most Guests walking up are going to have a ground level view that looks more like this:
Is the show building still slightly visible in this example? Sure. But no where near the issue your original image made it out to be.
But I'll be fair, too and say that there definitely is an area Disney needs to improve the sightlines for day Guests and that would be the Storybook Circus/Barnstormer:
While one could make the argument that only small children and their families waiting in line for Barnstormer would be subject to this view (thus being less likely to notice or care), I don't think that's a proper case to be making. This view in particular absolutely should be worked on and could absolutely be simply fixed with some more stinkin' (taller) trees.
Last edited:
SilentWindODoom
Well-Known Member
lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
You get to the canopy and the thing you see under it is the box.
DavidDL
Well-Known Member
Had a hard time figuring out what area you were referring to specifically, at first. As stated previously, I have not had a chance to experience it myself in person. But after digging around, I assume you mean once you finally make it to this vantage point:
Otherwise, it looks like this:
Originally, I was going to make a "grid" pun but I think that would play down the fact that I actually think you are right here. Like the Storybook Circus example, the view from the Restrooms beneath the canopy is absolutely bad show. Which is a shame because the examples provided all seem like they could be easily fixed.
Will they? Probably not (unless there are some trees meant to grow in somewhere). Should they? Yes. Will it be a deal breaker for me when I get there in person? Probably not.. but anything is possible. I guess I'll just have to wait and see when I go and judge it for myself, in-person.
DavidDL
Well-Known Member
For the record, my remarks were not meant to be an "attack". I'm sorry if they felt that way to you. You could hold the opinion that TRON should be burnt to the ground and hate it with a passion and while I'd be inclined to disagree with you, that'd be your opinion and I couldn't tell you that you're wrong to hold it. I hold similar beliefs about other attractions and their placement/presentation (like Mission: BREAKOUT!, which I despise) so far be it from me to tell you what to believe. Just know I'm not here to attack anyone.
But to springboard off the notion of opinions; I think it's important to remember that they are just that. Every single Guest who walks through those turnstiles or comments here has their own, completely different and totally arbitrary set of "rules" constructed in their mind that will affect how they view, and their time, in the parks. So while you may think TRON feels horribly placed and too similar to Space, myself and many others might not. TRON is obviously violating whatever rules you've constructed for Magic Kingdom but it's important to remember that those rules aren't engraved as law anywhere. -and as much as I despise something like Mission: BREAKOUT!, many others enjoy it. So I try to remind myself of that reality every once in a while, too. I don't make the rules for anyone but myself. It's nearly impossible to define what's objectively "right", "wrong", "good" or "bad" since we're really just deciding for ourselves. Once we make the decision to enter the park, we're really just Guests along for whatever ride the powers that be decide to take us on. Whether we decide to support said journey at all is up to each of us.
The theme parks are an art form, which is about the only objective truth here. Art and taste is of course, subjective. -and while I get the feeling I will be inclined to continue disagreeing with you once I finally get there and experience the attraction for myself, just know that I think your stance on this matter (like that of others) is to be respected, not attacked.
Last edited:
James Alucobond
Well-Known Member
Literally everyone staying at the Contemporary. And rooms facing this sell for a premium.
When you get to the red X (see below) heading to TRON, you can't see the BBB any more. You're forced up against the trees and can't see over them.
They just need to so the same in the highlighted orange below. Just get tall, columnar evergreens.
DavidDL
Well-Known Member
Not to get too far off topic but some of those rooms they're selling for a premium are an absolute joke. I saw a video of the "Edna Mode" room they were charging close to $900 dollars a night for and just.. yeah. Gross.
While I don't think backstage sightlines are something that a literal 14 floor hotel is going to be able to avoid when it's built right next to a theme park, the amount they charge and what is offered is definitely something Disney has the power to do something about.
yensidtlaw1969
Well-Known Member
No Name
Well-Known Member
James Alucobond
Well-Known Member
This is precisely why Space Mountain was built with views from practically every angle in mind. Seeing the show building isn't as much of an issue if the show building just looks decent. They didn't have to do anything extravagant, but concealing the emergency stair, softening some of the corners, and cladding the building in a modified version of the dimensional paneling on the adjacent Chevrolet building in Shanghai would have helped a lot.
DavidDL
Well-Known Member
Clearly the portion of the show building pictured here where you enter the "Grid" segment of the attraction is meant to be seen. Otherwise it would have been painted blue like the other sides that aren't hiding so well.
It's not like this GIF is showcasing something Disney forgot to hide or did "wrong". This is the intended design for this area of show building. Whether or not you believe it to be a style that fits well in Tomorrowland or otherwise matches the feeling/aesthetic TRON Lightcycle Run is going for on the whole is obviously up to you. I don't mind it because I've actually given the outdoor canopy area of this attraction some serious thought in the past. I didn't care for it when I first saw it and had a hard time wrapping my head around the decision by whatever creatives were involved to send us outside on a TRON coaster.
We get digitized into the world of TRON, then we get launched outside and then we're on the game grid? What's up with that? But when I took a step back and thought about this area under it's "upload" context, the choices they were making started to become more clear. Files move through the air into separate digital devices and back all the time. Even now at work (when I post about Disney to get away from the mundane), I send files to wirelessly to the printer next to me on a regular basis. The attraction is doing the same thing when we launch, sending us from one device to another.
Now, my printer is not exactly Cinderella Castle, from a visual standpoint. I think if it were, things wouldn't feel quite right to me. The side of building you've shared definitely has more in common with it than, say, the mountain range of Pandora (right down to the ports on the side that sort of look like where the vehicles are entering and Guests are exiting).
TLDR; I think this portion of the building actually serves its narrative purpose well enough. You're entering "the Grid", which means you're entering a digital device of some kind. Which more often than not, tend to look more like what is pictured here and less like the peaks of Everest. Hate this side of the building if you want but it's intentional, not a mistake.
Casper Gutman
Well-Known Member
To what extent does the attraction explain the central premise of the IP, that you are being “digitized” and put inside a computer? Is that made explicit within the attraction? As far as I can tell, there’s no threshold crossed, no moment when you move from our world to the “digitized” world. On the same note, to what extent is the reasoning behind the bike battle explained? It seems like the attraction just assumes riders will be quite familiar with the films.