davis_unoxx
Well-Known Member
That's good news in my opinion!Apart from the bits they forgot.
I’ve said it elsewhere, if plans come to fruition the land will look more 1975 than 1994.
Last edited:
That's good news in my opinion!Apart from the bits they forgot.
I’ve said it elsewhere, if plans come to fruition the land will look more 1975 than 1994.
Apart from the bits they forgot.
I’ve said it elsewhere, if plans come to fruition the land will look more 1975 than 1994.
Does it even still exist though?Tomorrowland 1994 is on borrowed time.
More than fair. Everything they did touch seemed like a win to me, but you’re right that the stones left unturned were problematic and remain so (the ones that haven’t been ripped out, at least)Apart from the bits they forgot.
Apart from the bits they forgot.
I’ve said it elsewhere, if plans come to fruition the land will look more 1975 than 1994.
That sounds like a shame. “The Future THat Always Was and Never Will Be” was perhaps the most brilliant approach they’ve ever taken to a Tomorrowland
Apart from the bits they forgot.
I’ve said it elsewhere, if plans come to fruition the land will look more 1975 than 1994.
Why not?Hey, I was born in 75. The last thing I want to see is avocado colored buildings and burnt orange **** carpet in the shops.
I don't know what's more concerning, those pictures or the fact that this site bleeped the word s h a g.
of course they can, espcioally color combinations.Ya see, colors can be associated with certain time periods.
There’s a certain poster here that doesn’t seem to get that.
if I didn't know layouts, I'd say Epcot was embracing that color scheme full on then.
is that earth?
i don't see one single nose in a phone, but i do see a mention of 'telephones' on an arrow sign - was that in communicore? an exhibit of a television phone or something like skype?
in unrelated news...
got a year on these, by chance?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.