lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
You don’t sell thousands of timeshares to first time visitors.
So the Tron coaster is going to have seasonal overlays? Or did I stumble into the wrong thread?
You don’t sell thousands of timeshares to first time visitors.
People really need to get that "once in a lifetime" theory out of their heads tbh. The vast majority of people that go to Disney will or have been multiple times.
Once in a lifetime is definitely a stretch. Once a decade isn't. But with the DVC and AP focus WDW has been trying to court the locals and the once every other year crowd more and more. But the once a decade or so or is still very strong and stronger here than out west.People really need to get that "once in a lifetime" theory out of their heads tbh. The vast majority of people that go to Disney will or have been multiple times.
People really need to get that "once in a lifetime" theory out of their heads tbh. The vast majority of people that go to Disney will or have been multiple times.
I disagree that seasonal things wouldn't draw in guests at WDW. They've just spent two decades telling you they won't. WDW just doesn't want to spend the money. (people flock to Epcot's festivals)
There's no reason they can't overlay Country Bears and Small World with Christmas overlays. They just don't "need" to so they don't. They have no problem doing Jungle Cruise. They're doing some things for Halloween with Pirates. They're doing passholder extra magic hours events now. I think they are seeing the benefit of a quick gain by doing these things. (I'm torn on the Haunted Mansion overlay; I love Nightmare but I agree it might not work to overhaul WDW's HM every year with the overlay but it's not like it wasn't once planned. Both Small World and Haunted Mansion holiday overlays were reportedly designed for WDW but went to Tokyo instead)
Your thesis that updates to Disneyland are more well recieved and compensated for than updates at Walt Disney World is improbable, since while WDW relies more upon tourism based upon itself, we can see that Disney guests are, for the most part, going to return. How oftek they return is based upon an incentive of if there is anything for them to experience that they haven't. We also aren't just talking about DL vs MK. It's also DCA vs EC, DHS, and DAK. Just because guests are coming to Orlando does not mean they are doing all of the parks, and so new stuff is crucial to the other 3 parks' success in many ways. They can come down and decide to do Islands of Adventure rather than Hollywood Studios. Just look at what Pandora did for DAK. If you add more to a park, it is more likely that a guest will chose it over another of the many Orlando parks. This is something that Orlando has more of over Disneyland. So all in all I think a potential gain following the introduction of new content should be about equal. What I also said in my post was that Disney does invest more in WDW than in DL, and they do, I think it's that they've messed a lot of it up and still not done quite enough for the 4 (6 counting water) parks that they have.
I think you’d be surprised how many first time visitors there are at WDW but the number is not nearly as high as some seem to believe.
Once in a lifetime is definitely a stretch. Once a decade isn't. But with the DVC and AP focus WDW has been trying to court the locals and the once every other year crowd more and more. But the once a decade or so or is still very strong and stronger here than out west.
Even if you go to once every 5-10 years or so that's large enough of a time frame where you wouldn't want to visit during a time when headliners are closed to either set up or take down overlays.
I'm sure Disney has the numbers on how many locals visit the park and how many people make annual trips though so if they deem that they could pick up more money by having more seasonal type ride setups they will make it happen.
Sorry but this is just factually incorrect. Disneyland has over 1.5M annual passholders alone, most of whom come the moment something new is available, no matter how small. Additionally, the localized audience allows people to plan a trip in as little as a week or two out. These are new, spending guests. In Florida, it takes a much different kind of advertising campaign to make people book a trip when they previously weren't planning one. Sure new attractions can be a draw to pull people from one park to the other (see: Pandora), but that doesn't necessary translate to an increase in paying guests.
This is just the simple fact of how they operate as a business.
Not necessarily according to how WDW has operated in the past few years. They are after the “once in a lifetime” guest who will potentially shell out thousands more than the savvy guest who visits every year. The various upcharge events are one such indicator. Most regular guests know you don’t need to pay $79/adult to ride Frozen and get some cupcakes, but Disney knows the first timers will jump all over it.Sure, many guests might go once in a decade, but many guests also go five times in a decade - and they, to Disney, are worth five timea more than the latter.
Not necessarily according to how WDW has operated in the past few years. They are after the “once in a lifetime” guest who will potentially shell out thousands more than the savvy guest who visits every year. The various upcharge events are one such indicator. Most regular guests know you don’t need to pay $79/adult to ride Frozen and get some cupcakes, but Disney knows the first timers will jump all over it.
I agree with you that Disney should be upgrading all four parks regularly to encourage return visitors, and perhaps what we’re seeing now is a return to that strategy, but they have been catering to the one time big spender for a while now.
It's blue.So, it's settled: TRON isn't getting a Christmas or Halloween overlay.
Anything else anyone knows or can say about TRON?
It's blue.
It goes fast.
It's shiny.
It's short.
It has beepy boopy music.
It looks like a amoeba.
It has pretty lights.
It has lightcycles that go vroom vroom.
It's director hasn't been part of a controversy.
It costs lots and lots of freedom bucks.
Did I cover everything?
Eh, I think you could fit that underneath "looks like a amoeba". It'll be interesting to see how it looks in person next to SM when its completed. There's going to be two very different styles of "future" buildings sitting next to each other.You missed the part that it has a pretty white canopy ;D
I knew I forgot to add something to my list...A blue amoeba crawling out of a very large white box.
Aaaaaaaaaand.... it's short. In fact, the ride is so short...It's blue.
It goes fast.
It's shiny.
It's short.
It has beepy boopy music.
It looks like a amoeba.
It has pretty lights.
It has lightcycles that go vroom vroom.
It's director hasn't been part of a controversy.
It costs lots and lots of freedom bucks.
Did I cover everything?
Aaaaaaaaaand.... it's short. In fact, the ride is so short that it will take many people longer to finish reading this post than it takes to complete the ride.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.