News Tron coaster coming to the Magic Kingdom

Pi on my Cake

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
People really need to get that "once in a lifetime" theory out of their heads tbh. The vast majority of people that go to Disney will or have been multiple times.
Once in a lifetime is definitely a stretch. Once a decade isn't. But with the DVC and AP focus WDW has been trying to court the locals and the once every other year crowd more and more. But the once a decade or so or is still very strong and stronger here than out west.
 

phillip9698

Well-Known Member
People really need to get that "once in a lifetime" theory out of their heads tbh. The vast majority of people that go to Disney will or have been multiple times.

Even if you go to once every 5-10 years or so that's large enough of a time frame where you wouldn't want to visit during a time when headliners are closed to either set up or take down overlays.

I'm sure Disney has the numbers on how many locals visit the park and how many people make annual trips though so if they deem that they could pick up more money by having more seasonal type ride setups they will make it happen.
 

TrojanUSC

Well-Known Member
I disagree that seasonal things wouldn't draw in guests at WDW. They've just spent two decades telling you they won't. WDW just doesn't want to spend the money. (people flock to Epcot's festivals)

There's no reason they can't overlay Country Bears and Small World with Christmas overlays. They just don't "need" to so they don't. They have no problem doing Jungle Cruise. They're doing some things for Halloween with Pirates. They're doing passholder extra magic hours events now. I think they are seeing the benefit of a quick gain by doing these things. (I'm torn on the Haunted Mansion overlay; I love Nightmare but I agree it might not work to overhaul WDW's HM every year with the overlay but it's not like it wasn't once planned. Both Small World and Haunted Mansion holiday overlays were reportedly designed for WDW but went to Tokyo instead)

Sorry but a Haunted Mansion overlay is not going to justify the cost in terms of bringing new guests to the property the way it would in Anaheim. It may pull guests from other areas of the resort but it's just not the kind of thing someone is going to plan a trip around. They know this. They've done much research.

The other thing which is a factor and part of their "official" line as to why they don't do these things: Your average guest saves up 3+ years for a trip to Walt Disney World. Many come only once or twice in their lifetime. When they come, Disney believes, they want to see The Haunted Mansion or Space Mountain, as intended. They'd be disappointed to see cheap holiday overlays from something they'd waited, essentially, their whole lives to see. This also doesn't account for, as others have said, the extended downtime for adding such overlays.
 
Last edited:

TrojanUSC

Well-Known Member
Your thesis that updates to Disneyland are more well recieved and compensated for than updates at Walt Disney World is improbable, since while WDW relies more upon tourism based upon itself, we can see that Disney guests are, for the most part, going to return. How oftek they return is based upon an incentive of if there is anything for them to experience that they haven't. We also aren't just talking about DL vs MK. It's also DCA vs EC, DHS, and DAK. Just because guests are coming to Orlando does not mean they are doing all of the parks, and so new stuff is crucial to the other 3 parks' success in many ways. They can come down and decide to do Islands of Adventure rather than Hollywood Studios. Just look at what Pandora did for DAK. If you add more to a park, it is more likely that a guest will chose it over another of the many Orlando parks. This is something that Orlando has more of over Disneyland. So all in all I think a potential gain following the introduction of new content should be about equal. What I also said in my post was that Disney does invest more in WDW than in DL, and they do, I think it's that they've messed a lot of it up and still not done quite enough for the 4 (6 counting water) parks that they have.

Sorry but this is just factually incorrect. Disneyland has over 1.5M annual passholders alone, most of whom come the moment something new is available, no matter how small. Additionally, the localized audience allows people to plan a trip in as little as a week or two out. These are new, spending guests. In Florida, it takes a much different kind of advertising campaign to make people book a trip when they previously weren't planning one. Sure new attractions can be a draw to pull people from one park to the other (see: Pandora), but that doesn't necessary translate to an increase in paying guests.

This is just the simple fact of how they operate as a business.
 

BlakeW39

Well-Known Member
I think you’d be surprised how many first time visitors there are at WDW but the number is not nearly as high as some seem to believe.
Once in a lifetime is definitely a stretch. Once a decade isn't. But with the DVC and AP focus WDW has been trying to court the locals and the once every other year crowd more and more. But the once a decade or so or is still very strong and stronger here than out west.
Even if you go to once every 5-10 years or so that's large enough of a time frame where you wouldn't want to visit during a time when headliners are closed to either set up or take down overlays.

I'm sure Disney has the numbers on how many locals visit the park and how many people make annual trips though so if they deem that they could pick up more money by having more seasonal type ride setups they will make it happen.

I'm not saying there aren't first time visitors - there's s first time for everything. What I'm saying is that WDW has a majority guest return rate. So once in a lifetime visitors are a minority. But the majority are also not going every one or two years. Of course once in a decade visitors are common. But once a guest is here, that doesn't mean they're doing all the parks. It is important for WDW to continue to add to their parks so that a guest deems it worthy of their precious vacation time.

Allow me to present an example. So a group of 5 goes WDW in 2012. They are choosing their parks for the trip and automatically choose Magic Kingdom. They then choose Epcot. After this, they search for their third and final park. After careful review, they decide Islands of Adventure for its recent Harry Potter land. They decided this because of Harry Potter and Islands of Adventure's great - and increasingly so - attraction roster. They go again in 2022. This time they do Magic Kingdom once again, but instead of Epcot they do Animal Kingdom and Hollywood Studios for their new Pandor and Star Wars: Galaxy's Edge lands.

See what I mean? Just because they go ti Orlando doesn't mean they'll do all of the parks, so it is important that all of the parks remain relevant and with large attraction selections. So new additions matter to those guests that only come once in a decade.

Also I'm not implying that guests don't care about ride closing. I was saying they do care about the parks having plenty of stuff to do. If they add more attractions, ride shutdowns won't be as big a deal because there will be so much for them to enjoy, one thing off of the list won't make much a difference, because remember, for once every decade guests, they won't care as much about a specific attraction unless it is vital to the park functioning, which no attraction should be aside from a very select few icons.

Also we must keep in mind that the majority of thse once in a decade guests won't even know about ride closings so it won't make much a difference for them.

Plus, even including the guests that go less often, they have far less pull on WDW. Sure, many guests might go once in a decade, but many guests also go five times in a decade - and they, to Disney, are worth five timea more than the latter.
 

BlakeW39

Well-Known Member
Sorry but this is just factually incorrect. Disneyland has over 1.5M annual passholders alone, most of whom come the moment something new is available, no matter how small. Additionally, the localized audience allows people to plan a trip in as little as a week or two out. These are new, spending guests. In Florida, it takes a much different kind of advertising campaign to make people book a trip when they previously weren't planning one. Sure new attractions can be a draw to pull people from one park to the other (see: Pandora), but that doesn't necessary translate to an increase in paying guests.

This is just the simple fact of how they operate as a business.

Nothing I stated was factually incorrect... because I stated no such facts. Nor did I say WDW had more annual passholders than DL. I said that guests care about more attractions added as most will return... which does involve major events rather than minor ones. What are you even claiming as i correct? None of what you said contradicted what I did.
 

Biff215

Well-Known Member
Sure, many guests might go once in a decade, but many guests also go five times in a decade - and they, to Disney, are worth five timea more than the latter.
Not necessarily according to how WDW has operated in the past few years. They are after the “once in a lifetime” guest who will potentially shell out thousands more than the savvy guest who visits every year. The various upcharge events are one such indicator. Most regular guests know you don’t need to pay $79/adult to ride Frozen and get some cupcakes, but Disney knows the first timers will jump all over it.

I agree with you that Disney should be upgrading all four parks regularly to encourage return visitors, and perhaps what we’re seeing now is a return to that strategy, but they have been catering to the one time big spender for a while now.
 

BlakeW39

Well-Known Member
Not necessarily according to how WDW has operated in the past few years. They are after the “once in a lifetime” guest who will potentially shell out thousands more than the savvy guest who visits every year. The various upcharge events are one such indicator. Most regular guests know you don’t need to pay $79/adult to ride Frozen and get some cupcakes, but Disney knows the first timers will jump all over it.

I agree with you that Disney should be upgrading all four parks regularly to encourage return visitors, and perhaps what we’re seeing now is a return to that strategy, but they have been catering to the one time big spender for a while now.

I mean the once in a lifetime guests are more ignorant (in the nicest way possible). I think they are trying to convert people over as more regular guests by finding those that haven't been. I don't think care more about a guest that spends lot once rather than a guest which spend slightly less on six separate occasions.
 

trainplane3

Well-Known Member
So, it's settled: TRON isn't getting a Christmas or Halloween overlay.

Anything else anyone knows or can say about TRON?
It's blue.
It goes fast.
It's shiny.
It's short.
It has beepy boopy music.
It looks like a amoeba.
It has pretty lights.
It has lightcycles that go vroom vroom.
It's director hasn't been part of a controversy.
It costs lots and lots of freedom bucks.

Did I cover everything?
 

larryz

I'm Just A Tourist!
Premium Member
It's blue.
It goes fast.
It's shiny.
It's short.
It has beepy boopy music.
It looks like a amoeba.
It has pretty lights.
It has lightcycles that go vroom vroom.
It's director hasn't been part of a controversy.
It costs lots and lots of freedom bucks.

Did I cover everything?
Aaaaaaaaaand.... it's short. In fact, the ride is so short...

That's your cue: everyone ask, out loud, "HOW SHORT IS IT?"

The ride is so short that it will take many people longer to finish reading this post than it takes to complete the ride.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom