UNCgolf
Well-Known Member
If he was still in charge, for example, I could imagine an Australia land in Animal Kingdom may have a shot at getting approved, whereas under the current management I don't think it has a hope in hell.
Someone would have to trick Chapek into believing that the Rescuers are a big franchise and they needed an Australia area to showcase the Rescuers Down Under.
But yes, Eisner's willingness to let the theme parks be their own thing (i.e. they weren't solely about IP corporate synergy) is sorely missed, as is his interest in building themed resorts. Even late in his tenure WDW got the Animal Kingdom Lodge, which is obviously a masterpiece. I don't think he'd have been okay with building something like the Riviera.