trainplane3
Well-Known Member
"You've got a friend in"...your car? an airplane? A friend in what?! I need to know how it ends. I'll never know who/what they have a friend in. Hopefully TSL will finally solve this unsolved mystery.
"You've got a friend in"...your car? an airplane? A friend in what?! I need to know how it ends. I'll never know who/what they have a friend in. Hopefully TSL will finally solve this unsolved mystery.
In other words, CHEAP.
Just more stuff at WDW for toddlers and snowflakes.
They have built exactly one attraction in the past 12 years that isn't toddler friendly.Cheap in one way but never cheap
Can't all be a cool screenz ride or e-ticket ...
They have built exactly one attraction in the past 12 years that isn't toddler friendly.
Might want to be careful about venom spewed out towards today's toddlers and "snowflakes", they may someday be the ones to decide what home to put you in.Just more stuff at WDW for toddlers and snowflakes.
The world could use a little more silly and a whole lot less ridiculous.While I agree they'll do a great job sticking to the theme, the theme is silly.
Might want to be careful about venom spewed out towards today's toddlers and "snowflakes", they may someday be the ones to decide what home to put you in.
If the goal is to add "toddler friendly" (or, preferably, fun for the whole family) attractions, rides with height limits like the two in TSL aren't the way to do it. Adding dark rides, AA shows - the stuff that Disney built its reputation upon - is the way to do it. So I've never entirely seen the logic of that argument.I'm aware, lol. But it's not like DHS was exactly toddler friendly either. The parks have varying needs. And they've spent two decades doing nothing and then next to nothing, so, we get lands like this that fill a need in the park, which we should have had ten years ago ...
If the goal is to add "toddler friendly" (or, preferably, fun for the whole family) attractions, rides with height limits like the two in TSL aren't the way to do it. Adding dark rides, AA shows - the stuff that Disney built its reputation upon - is the way to do it. So I've never entirely seen the logic of that argument.
I also don't get the "filling out the park" argument - besides the anomalous lump of Mickey's Birthdayland, what areas of MK were designed to "fill out the park?" Or the original EPCOT, for that matter?
Mr. Potato Head is going to feel very out of place if he's the only character in the land that isn't frozen still.
Well he's inside the midway game so maybe the idea is he's being played with.Mr. Potato Head is going to feel very out of place if he's the only character in the land that isn't frozen still.
No, no, see... those aren't Woody and Jessie and Rex out there in the land, they're STATUES of Woody and Jessie and Rex that the actual toys, who are on break at the moment, have constructed. And we all know statues of toys created by other toys are not imbued with sentience. It all makes perfect thematic sense.Mr. Potato Head is going to feel very out of place if he's the only character in the land that isn't frozen still.
I was assuming that all the characters in the land are frozen because someone’s coming...
Here's a look at Shanghai's Roundup:
Same ride system as Alien Swirling Saucers and Mater's Junkyard Jamboree (and soon, the Baymax ride in Japan, and Alien Swirling Saucers again in Paris.) Disney must be happy with that ride system to use it five times.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.