I couldn't care less, lol. It's cute, my boys will adore it...those two factors alone are plenty for me!I can't be the only one who literally couldn't give a damn about the scale right?
No, Disney doesn’t care eitherI can't be the only one who literally couldn't give a damn about the scale right?
No, you're not. I think the whole scale discussion is pretty silly. The fact is that it would be impossible to build that land to the relative scale established in the movies. If you were supposed to be the same size as a green army guy, the Woody and Buzz would be 50 feet (more or less) tall. But kids want a Buzz and Woody M&G. If we were shrunk to the size of Buzz, then the green army men would be less than a foot tall, and the conceit that we could ride "in" a Slinky Dog would be lost. This is just supposed to be a "fun" land, aimed mostly at kids, inspired by the Toy Story franchise, in which you are shrunken down to some arbitrary "toy size" in Andy's back yard. And I predict that it will be wildly popular with the target audience...I can't be the only one who literally couldn't give a damn about the scale right?
Since we don't care, please give me one good reason why they should. And don't say because of the gigantic crowd of people that are upset about scale. All 4 or 5 of them.No, Disney doesn’t care either
Disneyland only exists because Walt Disney aimed higher and did more than what the general public deemed necessary.Since we don't care, please give me one good reason why they should. And don't say because of the gigantic crowd of people that are upset about scale. All 4 or 5 of them.
I don’t disagree necessarily, but some would argue that if the scale can’t be executed properly/accurately, then the idea should be abandoned in favor of something else. The lack of consistency in scaling doesn’t bother me in practice but I do think they could have been more ambitious.No, you're not. I think the whole scale discussion is pretty silly. The fact is that it would be impossible to build that land to the relative scale established in the movies. If you were supposed to be the same size as a green army guy, the Woody and Buzz would be 50 feet (more or less) tall. But kids want a Buzz and Woody M&G. If we were shrunk to the size of Buzz, then the green army men would be less than a foot tall, and the conceit that we could ride "in" a Slinky Dog would be lost. This is just supposed to be a "fun" land, aimed mostly at kids, inspired by the Toy Story franchise, in which you are shrunken down to some arbitrary "toy size" in Andy's back yard. And I predict that it will be wildly popular with the target audience...
I don’t disagree necessarily, but some would argue that if the scale can’t be executed properly/accurately, then the idea should be abandoned in favor of something else. The lack of consistency in scaling doesn’t bother me in practice but I do think they could have been more ambitious.
That was the point. Even Walt didn't really get motivated by "being an innovator", he naturally was one simply by pursuing his passions. We are collectively applying that same motivation on others that were not blessed with that same natural instinct. Even if they did, they would not possess his gift of knowing, almost always, what the public wanted. That motivation no longer exists in the organization, however, I think we should be able to express gratitude that they have done as well as they have done in keeping the legacy alive. They still, in spite of uninformed comparisons, have not gone the route of six flags and others. In other words they do indeed still do way more then what the general public deemed necessary. In short, nothing makes this group happy.Disneyland only exists because Walt Disney aimed higher and did more than what the general public deemed necessary.
If you only aim to please the lowest common denominator, you’ll never be an innovator.
i posted a video on the avatar sub forum where Joe R was specifically talking about scale (among other things)Since we don't care, please give me one good reason why they should. And don't say because of the gigantic crowd of people that are upset about scale. All 4 or 5 of them.
The issue isn’t toys of different scales being used.We're talking about toys. When I was 10 years old, I used O-27 trains with G scale buildings. The horror! Remember what the theme here is, Andy doesn't care about scale
What's the issue?The issue isn’t toys of different scales being used.
That the difference in size is not consistent.What's the issue?
That the difference in size is not consistent.
When’s that ?@marni1971 and others-where are we at in terms of progress regarding opening date at this point? Still Memorial Day weekend?
When’s that ?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.