Toy Story Hotel Planned to replace Paradise Pier Hotel?

Stevek

Well-Known Member
This property is always and will always be garbage, but I like the splashpad / slide refresh.


Having stayed there twice over the years using very cheap AP rates, this pool area is a fantastic upgrade. It will be interesting to see how the full, final redo turns out. I know it's not going to be everyone cup of tea here, but it will be very popular and likely book up regularly post redo.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
Having stayed there twice over the years using very cheap AP rates, this pool area is a fantastic upgrade. It will be interesting to see how the full, final redo turns out. I know it's not going to be everyone cup of tea here, but it will be very popular and likely book up regularly post redo.
I had a similar thought, it’ll never be amazing because they are severely limited by what’s already there but this is a big improvement.

It’s too bad they decided to make the DL hotel ugly at the same time (IMHO).
 

Stevek

Well-Known Member
There is no way can Disney tear down and redesign everything? 😂
Can? Yes. Will? No. Even with Disneyland Forward, it's still in the artwork so I don't think it's remotely on their radar to tear down. Why would they? It still had solid occupancy and will be in even more demand once the redo is complete. Disney tourists and many in our fanbase aren't exactly known for demanding quality.
 

NobodyElse

Well-Known Member
Can? Yes. Will? No. Even with Disneyland Forward, it's still in the artwork so I don't think it's remotely on their radar to tear down. Why would they? It still had solid occupancy and will be in even more demand once the redo is complete. Disney tourists and many in our fanbase aren't exactly known for demanding quality.

There should really be a FAQ on this somewhere. I believe Disney is operating this hotel under a long-term lease that severely limits what they can physically do to the main structure.

Brighter minds will step in with details if they so desire.
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
There should really be a FAQ on this somewhere. I believe Disney is operating this hotel under a long-term lease that severely limits what they can physically do to the main structure.

Brighter minds will step in with details if they so desire.
That is the urban legend. We don't know that for sure. No one has ever given proof of that. It could be just TDA is cheap and owns the thing outright.
 

NobodyElse

Well-Known Member
That is the urban legend. We don't know that for sure. No one has ever given proof of that. It could be just TDA is cheap and owns the thing outright.

Like I said, it's outside my area direct knowledge. A few of the pages discussing the prevailing wisdom can be found here:



While I've never seen a copy of the "lease details", I've also not seen definitive documentation that Disney (or one of it's subsidiaries) outright owns Parcel # 12944117 with no strings attached.

And this image seems quite compelling:
1691523519001.png

If Disney truly owns that plot, this looks like their way of saying "We want the option to develop/redevelop all of our assets west of Disneyland Drive - except the old Emerald Hotel. That masterpiece is basically perfect the way it is, and it would be a crime against humanity to even consider substantially altering or it." :rolleyes:
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
Like I said, it's outside my area direct knowledge. A few of the pages discussing the prevailing wisdom can be found here:



While I've never seen a copy of the "lease details", I've also not seen definitive documentation that Disney (or one of it's subsidiaries) outright owns Parcel # 12944117 with no strings attached.

And this image seems quite compelling:
View attachment 736303
If Disney truly owns that plot, this looks like their way of saying "We want the option to develop/redevelop all of our assets west of Disneyland Drive - except the old Emerald Hotel. That masterpiece is basically perfect the way it is, and it would be a crime against humanity to even consider substantially altering or it." :rolleyes:
Well that map doesn't show the old Carrousel Inn and the immigration building behind it that we know Disney ownes.
 

NobodyElse

Well-Known Member
Well that map doesn't show the old Carrousel Inn and the immigration building behind it that we know Disney ownes.

And the 7-Eleven corner is shown in green as well. That may or may not mean anything.

I guess until I see evidence that Disney owns the Toy Story Hotel land, and isn't beholding to some sort of outside agreement, some could consider that Urban Legend material as well. Either way, Disney is indicating no intention to change anything beyond the superficial.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom