crispy
Well-Known Member
To be fair, I don't attend pro sports games either except an occasional minor league baseball (especially great when they have $1 hot dog night!).
My wife got me tickets to the Bears Vs. Lions Monday Night Football game for Fathers Day last year with my father and grandfather (2012). I could have killed her for how much she spent for upper deck tickets, which were (face value mind you) $163 per ticket for this lovely view:To be fair, I don't attend pro sports games either except an occasional minor league baseball (especially great when they have $1 hot dog night!).
Hey, I lived in Chicago for 11 years.True. Player income has skyrocketed. There are also only 25 or so people on the roster of a baseball team.
Taking the Cubs for example. Can we say that the Chicago Cubs have really, in the past 15 years, shown a massive improvement year over year on the field? Yet, their annual revenue and total valuation in that same period of time has skyrocketed.
My wife got me tickets to the Bears Vs. Lions Monday Night Football game for Fathers Day last year with my father and grandfather (2012). I could have killed her for how much she spent for upper deck tickets, which were (face value mind you) $163 per ticket for this lovely view:
View attachment 46844
I do agree that there are no winners and losers here, merely entertainment experiences we pay as consumers to enjoy.Hey, I lived in Chicago for 11 years.
I got to see the Bears Superbowl season.
I got to see Jordon's championships.
I got to see the Cubs.
The problem with using professional sports as an analogy with theme parks is that sports have winners and losers.
Theme parks don't have to.
But if you want to use a baseball analogy, then right now Universal is the Boston Red Sox with 3 World Series titles in the last 10 years.
Right now, WDW is the Cubs. (How was that 66-and-96 season anyway? )
The Cubs WDW analogy is interesting. Have you ever read this book -Right now, WDW is the Cubs. (How was that 66-and-96 season anyway? )
Couple things. One, it is not "obvious" to a lot of people, how the market economy works. I can tell you that this is not the first time that I have had to explain, to what appear to be educated people, how our economy works, so when you fire a flaming comment at me, you are stifling other people's desire to actually understand how supply and demand works.Thank you captain obvious.
The market been "recovering" since 2004.... Ten years of recovery? More like poor economic & strategic planning.
See the post by @George.I do agree that there are no winners and losers here, merely entertainment experiences we pay as consumers to enjoy.
I don't know how we could compare the theme park that is consistently #1 in the world with the Cubs, who have not won in over 100 years.
You mean the same way a Disney fanatic loves Walt Disney World?Cubs fans do care about winning, however, they are about tradition, history, nuance of the game. A Cubs fan is multidimensional. Their love of the team is not found in the win/loss percentage.
There are definate similarities. I must also add Cubs fans are critical.You mean the same way a Disney fanatic loves Walt Disney World?
Couple things. One, it is not "obvious" to a lot of people, how the market economy works. I can tell you that this is not the first time that I have had to explain, to what appear to be educated people, how our economy works, so when you fire a flaming comment at me, you are stifling other people's desire to actually understand how supply and demand works.
Two, I wasn't speaking of an overall market recovery, rather, the individual market that is WDW and their pricing structure.
Don't be so fast to flame if you don't understand the conversation that is being had.
You means WDW fanatics on about a dozen websites are not?There are definate similarities. I must also add Cubs fans are critical.
See the post by @George.
With a loyal fan base, what are the Cubs incentive to provide a winning team?
Universal has to work for it.
WDW doesn't.
WDW can raise prices, reduce maintenance, lower food quality, and let the parks stagnate yet "guests" keep showing up anyway.
Not sure if you've watched any Yankees games but there were a lot of empty seats in 2013.
Two years ago, the Red Sox had a horrible season and their Front Office was practically begging people to show up. Having lived in Boston and Hartford, I've bought tickets for more than a few games but 2012 was the first year that I received unsolicited emails from the Red Sox pushing ticket sales.
Yeah, the Red Sox/Cubs analogy holds up pretty well, especially in recent years.
The thing where I can't make the analogy work in my head is the history. If the Cubs were sitting on their laurels after a good 40-50 years of consistent winning, I could make the leap. It's why I think Yankees. Everything else I can get behind in the analogy.
Remember to credit me on your chapter of MM+/A-RodYankees history. Cubs fan base. Done and done. I'm working on the book now.
If you owned the Cubs you would think differently. Forget about wins and losses on the field.The thing where I can't make the analogy work in my head is the history. If the Cubs were sitting on their laurels after a good 40-50 years of consistent winning, I could make the leap. It's why I think Yankees. Everything else I can get behind in the analogy.
It's already over $100 with tax so why not straight to $104. I guess we'll find out this summerThe decision to go from $95 to $99 for MK is hardly surprising. Many of us called that one a while back, but what will the next increase be? Will it be listed as an even $100 or will they just go straight to $104?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.