mickEblu
Well-Known Member
Dr Facilier is such a great villain. A travesty if he has no part in the ride.
I mean, he was in the new Once Upon a Studio short. WDI- Just put him in the damn ride and stop overthinking everything.
Dr Facilier is such a great villain. A travesty if he has no part in the ride.
I wish I could have hauled that house away! it was so strongly built they had a lot of trouble taking it down!
- House of Tomorrow (1957): "With this project, Monsanto wanted to demonstrate plastic's versatility as a high-quality, engineered material."
Well?...I have to suspect that the Doctor appears on the flume lift tunnel. I mean,...this is the "dangerous" part of the atteaction. This guy HAS to be the cause of it with some "Voodoo" he puts on your log.Dr Facilier is such a great villain. A travesty if he has no part in the ride.
Disney magic.Wait, what is the missing ingredient again?
I hope you are right.Well?...I have to suspect that the Doctor appears on the flume lift tunnel. I mean,...this is the "dangerous" part of the atteaction. This guy HAS to be the cause of it with some "Voodoo" he puts on your log.
Im wondering if projection mapping will be used to replace Audio Anamatronics. They are certainly cheaper to build and maintain.
The last river boat attraction that Disney built was the one in Pandora. That one is pretty emersive and spectacular so if that is any indication of what Disney us able to do today?? If Tiana's Bayou Adcenture is only half as good as that one, this should be a huge hit.
I really do agree with you 100%, but I heard they wanted to avoid having their first African American princess be a frog the whole ride. But if the ride starts with her at the diner and her with Lottie then they could have remedied the middle by having scenes from the movie and include animatronic Tiana’s throughout narrating. And then at the end she is human again.That is my issue exactly... I liked the film and characters... I don't need a whole new story into a character that (could have) evolved after story we love... Just like other classic Disney film characters...I don't need a sequel to know what happened afterwards...The idea of being in the bayou and having Dr Facilier send you over the water to the "Other Side" or escaping the "Other Side" over a waterfall sounds like an amazing attraction to me... Ending at Tiana's Palace is great too...but all this gobbledygook they have created does not make sense to me...
I desperately hope they are just keeping him a secret. He’s dead so he shouldn’t appear much but a few sinister shadows at moments and then his ghost appearing in the old Laughin’ Place would be awesome.Dr Facilier is such a great villain. A travesty if he has no part in the ride.
No. It doesn’t seem to align with the story beats thus far.I desperately hope they are just keeping him a secret. He’s dead so he shouldn’t appear much but a few sinister shadows at moments and then his ghost appearing in the old Laughin’ Place would be awesome.
But, I don’t think it’s happening.
Messaging is important. I was speaking of the making money aspect of their movie business.I would think a movie with no message would be boring.
I wouldn't even say AA goes particularly hard on a one sided pro capitalist message. There are aspects of pro capitalism, but it almost always presents the opposing viewpoints afterwards and even errs on captalism able to become a very destructive force when not kept in check. Like how industry harms the environment and indigenous groups, or the effects of the Great Depression on poor people, including derisive mockery towards Wall Street and the (former) ultra wealthy individuals who became wealthy at their expense. There's also significant screentime given to MLK Jr in the finale, who was no lover of capitalism to say the least.Sure. History telling is always a challenge, ESPECIALLY for a family theme park environment. But the China pavilion isn't going to going to go hard on communism the way the American Adventure does on capitalism (for what I think are obvious reasons).
The biggest thing is (and I'd invite non-Americans to weigh in here) the patriotism of most American stuff in the parks vs. the culture-oriented representations of other cultures.
Maybe they will hint he’s on the other side of Big Thunder Mountain.I desperately hope they are just keeping him a secret. He’s dead so he shouldn’t appear much but a few sinister shadows at moments and then his ghost appearing in the old Laughin’ Place would be awesome.
But, I don’t think it’s happening.
And then they can do another retheme, "Tiana's Bayou Adventure With Brer Rabbit", where Brer Rabbit torments Louis in retaliation for Tiana's Bayou Adventure! Though maybe he should be going after Iger instead...At the end of the ride Brer Rabbit will pop up and tell us to have a zip a dee doo dah day only to be rushed away by Louis like Nigel Channing did to figment in Imagination 2.0
Nope. They're turning the lift hill into Mama Odie's house.Well?...I have to suspect that the Doctor appears on the flume lift tunnel. I mean,...this is the "dangerous" part of the atteaction. This guy HAS to be the cause of it with some "Voodoo" he puts on your log.
That's most certainly the entire reason why they're having the ride take place after the movie. And that reason is likely the only reason Dr. Facilier isn't in the ride.I heard they wanted to avoid having their first African American princess be a frog the whole ride.
No Dr. Facilier???And then they can do another retheme, "Tiana's Bayou Adventure With Brer Rabbit", where Brer Rabbit torments Louis in retaliation for Tiana's Bayou Adventure! Though maybe he should be going after Iger instead...
Nope. They're turning the lift hill into Mama Odie's house.
I expect @Buried20KLeague's guess as to what the plot of the ride will be to be accurate. The scene where we see Brer Fox pushing Brer Bear's butt into the hole in the tree will be replaced by some character (maybe Louis) suggesting they go ask Mama Odie if she's seen the secret ingredient around. Then you head into the Laughin' Place, which is now a salt mine or whatever (some character will probably say "I know a shortcut to Mama Odie's house! It's through the salt mine!") and then the cave where Brer Fox has trapped Brer Rabbit is replaced by a character going "Mama Odie is just up that hill!" and we head inside her house and encounter Mama Odie at the top where Brer Fox's lair is. Mama Odie has the secret ingredient because [REASONS], and she says, "You'd better get this to Tiana! Down you go!", KER-SPLASH.
Oh, and apparently Naveen will be playing a "humorous role" in the story. Make of that what you will.
That's most certainly the entire reason why they're having the ride take place after the movie. And that reason is likely the only reason Dr. Facilier isn't in the ride.
I suppose they could just have the voodoo spirits show up without Dr. Facilier to mess with the riders for no reason, but if they're not doing that for the lift hill, I doubt they'll be in the ride at all. Maybe they're afraid of making the ride "too scary" for little girls.
Maybe they'll invent a new, less menacing villain for the ride? Or maybe the villains will be those three idiot frog hunters from the movie? Boy, wouldn't THAT be a downgrade from Brer Fox...
No Dr. Facilier???
What the heck? He was the coolest part of the movie. Dang! Oh well....[sigh]..maybe the design team thought his appearance in the ride would scare or "trigger" a small number of people????
Maybe Dr. Facilier is considered a negative stereotype abd needed to be canceled in 2023??? I dunno....
I can only guees and wonder what concepts go through the mind of a Tiana's Bayou Adventure attraction Imagineer today....
I guess we will find out in a year or two. (Maybe 3 or 4)
What are you making of it? You seem to implying something.Oh, and apparently Naveen will be playing a "humorous role" in the story. Make of that what you will.
I’m not sure why people are intent on framing Facilier’s absence in ideological terms. The ride takes place after the movie, by which point Facilier has been carried off to the underworld. You wouldn’t expect to see Ursula or Maleficent in rides set after the events of the two movies to which those characters belong. (For my part, I would love for Facilier to make an appearance in spirit form, but I’m not holding my breath.)
Not necessarily depending on the story they’ve come up with.Except Facilier coming back in spirit form would make complete sense
Not necessarily depending on the story they’ve come up with.
I am not particularly inspired by what we know of the plot so far either, but I see no point getting preemptively angry about something of which we have so few concrete details. Why not experience the finished product first before forming a judgement?Yes we wouldn’t want an excellent villain , great song and some suspense getting in the way of the missing ingredient/ salt mine/ Mardi Gras party.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.