News Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress

[Disstevefan1]

what would that even look like?

Who knows? Maybe animatronics just sway with the music.
I don’t know, but they got to get this attraction working before it gets busy.

 

[Incomudro]

Who knows? Maybe animatronics just sway with the music.
I don’t know, but they got to get this attraction working before it gets busy.

Just tie a rope around the band and hook it up to a motorized wheel that cycles around.
Tiana and Louis can stand statically and say "They can play!"

 

[SamusAranX]

I know it’s forum dogma to pile on Runaway Railway, but I find it much more enjoyable than The Great Movie Ride. For what it’s worth, it scores higher in Touring Plans’ survey than its predecessor did.

The Great Movie Ride | Disney's Hollywood Studios

Entering through a re-creation of Hollywood's Chinese Theater, guests board vehicles for a fast-paced tour through soundstage sets from classic

touringplans.com

Mickey & Minnie's Runaway Railway | Disney's Hollywood Studios

Disney restarted regular production of Mickey Mouse cartoons in 2013. Mostly written and directed by Paul Rudish, these 4-minute vignettes—

touringplans.com

(And before anyone misunderstands me, this doesn’t mean I think TBA is superior to Splash. It is an unfortunate downgrade in my view.)

I too enjoy the MMRR ride but I think it’s park placement equivalent being a square peg into a round hole and a lot of bare sterile places (a commonality among many trackless rides it seems) knocks it down some. Good? Yes. Could have been better if put in MK and with a higher budget? Yes

 

[EagleScout610]

Could you imagine if WDI had the gall to market each individual character from Splash? Here's Gary the Goose. A relaxed yet refined fellow, Gary can often be seen enjoying an authentically southern beverage. Gary likes instrumental blue grass, or jazz music and long walks on the beach.

View attachment 806845

Actually, that's Gus the Goose. This is Gary Goose.

 

[Mike S]

No one is gloating?! You are obviously reading a different thread than I am. This thread has become a show the last 20 pages.

The thread matches the ride then and is completely on point.

 

[LittleBuford]

I too enjoy the MMRR ride but I think it’s park placement equivalent being a square peg into a round hole and a lot of bare sterile places (a commonality among many trackless rides it seems) knocks it down some. Good? Yes. Could have been better if put in MK and with a higher budget? Yes

That’s fair. I don’t agree with you in either regard—I love that it’s the park’s centrepiece and think it’s the very opposite of sterile—but I appreciate your view!

 

[Epcot81Fan]

I too enjoy the MMRR ride but I think it’s park placement equivalent being a square peg into a round hole and a lot of bare sterile places (a commonality among many trackless rides it seems) knocks it down some. Good? Yes. Could have been better if put in MK and with a higher budget? Yes

MMRR's placement in Disneyland is perfect for the quality of the attraction - at the back of the park, next to a child's play area, in a throwaway location, behind a far better Roger Rabbit attraction.

It's location at Hollywood Studios is a travesty and embarrassment vs. the iconic, park theme supporting attraction that preceded it.

 

[mickEblu]

MMRR's placement in Disneyland is perfect for the quality of the attraction - at the back of the park, next to a child's play area, in a throwaway location, behind a far better Roger Rabbit attraction.

It's location at Hollywood Studios is a travesty and embarrassment vs. the iconic, park theme supporting attraction that preceded it.

True and yet even at Disneyland I still wish the execution was better. The concept had so much potential.

 

[Epcot81Fan]

All I can say is, if just one single girl shows up on my doorstep this Halloween dressed like this; in jodhpurs and no-shape trousers and glamourless utility jacket and hand woven frumpy hat, I will buy everyone a churro...

Perhaps its a marketing promotion with Chico's?

 

[EricsBiscuit]

No one is gloating?! You are obviously reading a different thread than I am. This thread has become a show the last 20 pages.

Why? Because people are rightly criticizing a failed attraction and a bungled opening?

 

[LittleBuford]

They ve now moved the bar to “you can criticize TBA but don’t do it with too much pizazz.”

I think hyperbole and intemperance have a really negative impact on the whole of this forum. Some posters get into a sort of uncontrolled frenzy that makes it difficult to engage in serious, good-faith discussion. I agree with pretty much all of the criticisms people are expressing about TBA’s weak story and woeful debut, but I find it difficult to relate to the euphoric level of gloating that has taken hold of this thread. People seem almost gleeful, and that makes no sense to me.

 

[Brer Oswald]

Yes, twice, as we also had Lightning Lane. It was…charming, I suppose. My wife said she felt the AAs (except broken Odie at the end) were impressive but the story was very thin and it was ridiculous to not include Facilier. She is not a member of these boards and is a reasonably casual Disney fan, so I’d imagine others feel similarly.

The kids loved it.

At least the ride system is still a blast!

What’s with the motionless armadillo statues?

Idk, but Tom Corless seems to be a huge fan (given that he blocked me after I called it a plastic statue).

 

[LittleBuford]

For me it’s because I really like joking at Disneys expense these days.

I suppose that’s what I don’t get.

 

[Mike S]

I suppose that’s what I don’t get.

Because imo they’ve completely fallen off the deep end with so much of what they do lately it’s fun to joke about them. I want them to do better but I know the company as a whole is so far gone that I prefer to joke than to get sad about it. If they turn around, great. If they continue to trip over themselves, also great so I have something to laugh at.

If it revealed something worth noting, yes.

Consistency is hard to come by these days. Good on you

 

[EagleScout610]

We're joyous because for the last 4 years if you said it could end up being a downgrade from the previous attraction you got shut down pretty much instantly. Well it pretty unanimously is, and we're just enjoying being able to call it out as such.

 

[LittleBuford]

We're joyous because for the last 4 years if you said it could end up being a downgrade from the previous attraction you got shut down pretty much instantly. Well it pretty unanimously is, and we're just enjoying being able to call it out as such.

A look at any random sequence of pages in this thread will quickly disprove the notion that negative opinions of TBA have ever been outweighed (much less drowned out) by positive ones.

 

[Jedi14]

Why? Because people are rightly criticizing a failed attraction and a bungled opening?

I think it’s more that the Tiana threads tend to go from being actual discussion to an echo chamber.

 

[disney fan 13]

The ride was always going to have detractors considering the ride it replaced and the... climate... the replacement was announced in, becoming a proxy in a much broader culture war. Therefore, they really had to knock it out of the park with this one and they failed. Leading those who were always going to hate the ride to take a victory lap, and everyone else being pretty disappointed. JMO.

 

[Drew the Disney Dude]

So, what did I miss?

 

[Disney Analyst]

I’m talking about the dynamic here within our own community. I don’t recall anyone in these threads gloating about the loss of Splash Mountain. Even those who tried to remain positive about TBA (myself among them) generally expressed their fondness for its predecessor.

You’re correct. People are injecting their bias from outside discussions, on different platforms, and using that to inform how they engage with the rest of us here. Seems unfair to this board and community.

Reminder everyone, this isn’t Twitter. We are all real people behind these typed out letters. We were all someone who came to these boards seeking a community of people with a similar interest. We are not your enemy. Engage in good faith and kindness, and when any of us fails that, which I myself have, own up, and try to engage differently next time. We can have differences in opinion on how to run these parks in 2024, but that doesn’t make us enemies. The stakes are not that high.

Most of us who have expressed positivity and optimism about this re-theme on these boards, usually stated we loved Splash, and were sad to see it go, but could understand why a company would decide to do it.

Seems like a pretty reasonable take. Not extreme.