Maybe time for a bit of a hot take, but I actually like the Tiana's Foods logo design when viewed through the lens of roaring 20's New Orleans. The logo is very reminiscent of company logos of the era with flat colors and bold lettering while still featuring recognizable iconography, all wrapped up in a circular package. It makes sense this signage would not be artificially aged with rust and debris because in the narrative this company and facility opened less than a year prior.
View attachment 779670
My main issue is that the rest of the architecture surrounding the signage does not reflect that same roaring 20's New Orleans and as such there is disparity between the signage and the architecture. I feel this is the same issue with the mural; it would look authentic along a New Orleans city street, but not on a wooden barn. If rumor is to be believed and the rest of Frontierland south of TBA is to become an iteration of NOS then maybe that disparity will be felt less, but time will tell. The main entrance sign does indeed feel a bit too on the nose purely for a the wording though.
But it baffles the mind that there are people in this thread who genuinely believe the Tiana's Foods logo was developed by some lone intern in 2 minutes on Canva and it was simultaneously approved all the way up to physical production. Do you legitimately think no research went into the logo's design? I implore you that anytime you see a decision made in the parks that doesn't immediately make sense to you to take 5 minutes and do a little research on why a team of people might have reached such a conclusion. Doesn't mean you have to like their decision or support it, but it does wonders to your understanding of the creative industry and pipeline to ask questions and find answers before presenting criticisms.