...and animals don't sing and play instruments...
I agree, the whole thing feels like a downgrade in structure which matches with what Disney is about lately, downsizing everything in more ways than one. But not surprising since they did a patch job on the logs and not replaced the rabbits with a frog or something, anything, its already a bad sign that details may be less in this ride. I said it in the other thread but I think were in for another frozen ever after style budget thing here no matter what insiders may keep saying. It just spells corners being cut. I do hope that theory is totally wrong,,but so far....Continually replying to the same people over and over again with the same contrived explanations, when said people already said that they don't consider the explanation remotely acceptable or believable. Then calling into question their intelligence for not agreeing and saying "good day" with any further commentary now invalid and moot. Come on now, if that's not trying to bully and force someone into changing their opinion, I don't know what is...
I have no qualms with people who like or dislike what they did with the exterior. If someone looks at it and thinks it doesn't look right, it's not really anyone's business to try and convince them otherwise. It's Disney's job to try and convince people that something looks correct and plausible. And not through ridiculously contrived backstories, but by just looking at the something and being able to understand and believe it.
I will throw my own hat into the discussion to say that the exterior doesn't remotely resemble any of the examples posted. At all-
View attachment 770624
View attachment 770623
These look NOTHING alike. And the thing is, i'm not even mad that it doesn't resemble those landmarks. As weird as the exterior currently looks, nothing about those real landmarks look like they would make for good and interesting fits for a theme park attraction either.
My biggest pet peeve is still the top of the structure being completely bald. Far too late for this, but they really should have gone with at least some variant of Mama Odie's tree and boat up there. Even if it needed to go through some conceptual/structural revisions to be built (the boat being moved down and embedded into the mouth of the cavern would have made even more sense and also taken a lot of weight off the tree). Just scrap the entire Avery Island and salt dome stuff entirely. It wouldn't have really fixed ALL of the problems entirely, but at the very least it would have been somewhat better...
Looks like they repainted the rock work inside the cavern leading up to the drop green.
I guess I might be accused of trying to convince fellow fans to appreciate some of the things I like about this project (and others). I don't intend for it to come across as bullying anymore than when I try to convince my theme-park-avoidant friends to visit WDW, or my too-grown-up-for-comic-book friends to wade into the better parts of the MCU.I have no qualms with people who like or dislike what they did with the exterior. If someone looks at it and thinks it doesn't look right, it's not really anyone's business to try and convince them otherwise. It's Disney's job to try and convince people that something looks correct and plausible. And not through ridiculously contrived backstories, but by just looking at the something and being able to understand and believe it.
Then you've already shown a greater amount of understanding and courtesy towards people you don't agree with than some of the other comments i've seen.I guess I might be accused of trying to convince fellow fans to appreciate some of the things I like about this project (and others). I don't intend for it to come across as bullying anymore than when I try to convince my theme-park-avoidant friends to visit WDW, or my too-grown-up-for-comic-book friends to wade into the better parts of the MCU.
For me (as a WDW geek), the more I learn about the details of TBA (the rationale, the backstory, the AAs, the set pieces, etc.), the more I find to appreciate and look forward to. A lot of that has come through your contributions to this thread. Sometimes, in my zeal, I point out these details to naysayers in hopes they'll find something they can enjoy and look forward too, as well.
Of course, at the end of the day, people are entitled to their opinions and perspectives.
Well, the attraction is not complete yet so perhaps the work is not done on the logs. Now if they look like this when it opens, then it would be an issue. Until then, I’ll wait to form an opinion.I agree, the whole thing feels like a downgrade in structure which matches with what Disney is about lately, downsizing everything in more ways than one. But not surprising since they did a patch job on the logs and not replaced the rabbits with a frog or something, anything, its already a bad sign that details may be less in this ride. I said it in the other thread but I think were in for another frozen ever after style budget thing here no matter what insiders may keep saying. It just spells corners being cut. I do hope that theory is totally wrong,,but so far....
Seems strange to wait until you are testing to rebuild the ride vehicles.Well, the attraction is not complete yet so perhaps the work is not done on the logs. Now if they look like this when it opens, then it would be an issue. Until then, I’ll wait to form an opinion.
Well, the attraction is not complete yet so perhaps the work is not done on the logs. Now if they look like this when it opens, then it would be an issue. Until then, I’ll wait to form an opinion.
I don't expect them to add new themed hood ornaments at this point at least. The physical patch looks "final" in the sense that it has been textured to look like the rest of the existing tree bark texture. So I don't think we'll see further ornamental detail, which is a real shame.Seems strange to wait until you are testing to rebuild the ride vehicles.
Taking a theme park icon and making it look so generic is beyond me from a marketing perspective but it doesn’t look bad which is more than I can say for the LAST time they rethemed an icon (looks at mission breakout with disgust)
It feels like if you took out the water tower it would belong in fantasyland, there’s a fairy tale whimsy to it now that is pretty honestly. but out of place maybe for Frontierland. I do understand the drastic change in look from Splash. This iteration is going to need to do all it can to create its own identity.Continually replying to the same people over and over again with the same contrived explanations, when said people already said that they don't consider the explanation remotely acceptable or believable. Then calling into question their intelligence for not agreeing and saying "good day" with any further commentary now invalid and moot. Come on now, if that's not trying to bully and force someone into changing their opinion, I don't know what is...
I have no qualms with people who like or dislike what they did with the exterior. If someone looks at it and thinks it doesn't look right, it's not really anyone's business to try and convince them otherwise. It's Disney's job to try and convince people that something looks correct and plausible. And not through ridiculously contrived backstories, but by just looking at the something and being able to understand and believe it.
I will throw my own hat into the discussion to say that the exterior doesn't remotely resemble any of the examples posted. At all-
View attachment 770624
View attachment 770623
These look NOTHING alike. And the thing is, i'm not even mad that it doesn't resemble those landmarks. As weird as the exterior currently looks, nothing about those real landmarks look like they would make for good and interesting fits for a theme park attraction either.
My biggest pet peeve is still the top of the structure being completely bald. Far too late for this, but they really should have gone with at least some variant of Mama Odie's tree and boat up there. Even if it needed to go through some conceptual/structural revisions to be built (the boat being moved down and embedded into the mouth of the cavern would have made even more sense and also taken a lot of weight off the tree). Just scrap the entire Avery Island and salt dome stuff entirely. It wouldn't have really fixed ALL of the problems entirely, but at the very least it would have been somewhat better...
Not sure what the point of this post was, considering you didn't respond to my comment and intentionally shut down further discussion by closing with 'Good day'. But also, why jump in and comment at all if you don't care to actually reply to my comment?
I googled 'salt mine' and nothing even close to Tiana's Bayou Adventure popped up, though I do think the aesthetic of a few salt mines would fit a horror themed attraction well. It also blends in, and doesn't have that unique flair you'd expect of a headliner's façade at Disney's flagship resort.
My post was in good faith- your reply seems like it isn't. And what's the point of a discussion board if we can't, you know, discuss?
Did they replace the briar patch with something yet or are we just taking a drop down the mound into the water below?
I believe there's still work to be done on the shop.The top level is a swamp. The bottom level is still the American frontier/southwest.
The old Briar Patch shop didn’t seem to be changed at all when I was there last week…only with no briars, just red clay/rock and exposed roots.
I guess they are either saving that for later after the ride officially opens….or they still want it to still match the BTMRR area.
Models and renderings show clearly that more is to be installed in Toy Story Land too.To which I say the models and renderings show clearly that there's more to be installed in that space.
That's not really true, the model of Toy Story Land that was revealed to the public was accurate to what they built. Toy Story Land did release artwork prior to the design going though (unfortunate) revisions, but then they released updated artwork that reflected the new plans. Similar to Tiana's.Models and renderings show clearly that more is to be installed in Toy Story Land too.
You need to train your pets better....and animals don't sing and play instruments...
And I thought one of the qualifications needed to be president of Animal Kingdom was the ability to sing and dance...and animals don't sing and play instruments...
Models and renderings show clearly that more is to be installed in Toy Story Land too.
That would be so cool…You need to train your pets better.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.