News Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress

celluloid

Well-Known Member
That isn't what I said. At all.

You have stated that this thread has spun into over negativity. And you then gave your negative take on the mural, but did not like that why it and the further evoking the disliked conceit the attraction has had was spinning. You then said in a post that you think it is helpful to wait, after stating the mural itself will never win you over.

What about this is not what you said. "At All?" All of that is completely wrong from what you stated?

People were told that the ride will not feature the Food co-op backstory, and then a mural of a knife cutting food into gumbo ingredients then a bowl full of gumbo appears along the ride path itself.

Old concerns that were told to be hushed will for sure come back as there is evidence.
 
Last edited:

Mikomike12

Well-Known Member
Please take your whining to this thread.


This thread is for construction updates.
For the love of god people, how many times do people/mods here have to reiterate this thread is for construction. please take your endless gripes to the other thread, I promise you 90% of what your complaining has already been said on atleast a dozen pages past, take it to the other thread I shouldn’t have to skip through 30 pages to find one photo of construction that 5 people talk about while the other 50 complain about something irrelevant
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
For the love of god people, how many times do people/mods here have to reiterate this thread is for construction. please take your endless gripes to the other thread, I promise you 90% of what your complaining has already been said on atleast a dozen pages past, take it to the other thread I shouldn’t have to skip through 30 pages to find one photo of construction that 5 people talk about while the other 50 complain about something irrelevant

The discussion is on the construction relating to evidence of the attraction's storyline. Thematic elements are being installed that connect this.
If the thread is ONLY and Soley for images of construction, then you have no discussion. The point of a discussion board is to discuss the construction. New mural work was posted today and being discussed.
The mural is what was being discussed as it is a mural of food being prepared to serve.
 

Mikomike12

Well-Known Member
The discussion is on the construction relating to evidence of the attraction's storyline. Thematic elements are being installed that connect this.
If the thread is ONLY and Soley for images of construction, then you have no discussion. The point of a discussion board is to discuss the construction. New mural work was posted today and being discussed.
The mural is what was being discussed as it is a mural of food being prepared to serve.
The Description of this thread states “It is not to discuss the merits of the retheme of Splash Mountain” which is basically every other message in here.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
The Description of this thread states “It is not to discuss the merits of the retheme of Splash Mountain” which is basically every other message in here.

I don't think the talking about the mural that was posted fits that just beause you think there is too much discussion over it.
For the most part. The discussion has been about how the mural correlates to the new attraction. My posts are not comparing the attraction's facades. It is judging the mural based on its current construction to what is in the Press from Disney. It is normal to compare images people are taking of progress to what is coming out of Disney. Some people do not like the art direction they are seeing in the construction, and that is a part of discussing construction. The reveal of choices.

Sorry if this leads you to frustration or hyperbole.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
You have stated that this thread has spun into over negativity.

Old concerns that were told to be hushed will for sure come back as there is evidence.
I said it spun into a rehashing of old grievances only tangentially related to the update at hand.

Old concerns that were told to be hushed will for sure come back as there is evidence.
I'm not telling anyone to hush. I am simply expressing my own opinion, without trying to silence anyone else's.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
I said it spun into a rehashing of old grievances only tangentially related to the update at hand.
The latest construction update lined up and validated many people's concerns. It can be expected that there would be discussion on the latest revealed installment. You see that as rehashing. Some would see that as a connection. Connotation difference is what you have there.
 

Mikomike12

Well-Known Member
I don't think the talking about the mural that was posted fits that just beause you think there is too much discussion over it.
For the most part. The discussion has been about how the mural correlates to the new attraction. My posts are not comparing the attraction's facades. It is judging the mural based on its current construction to what is in the Press from Disney. It is normal to compare images people are taking of progress to what is coming out of Disney. Some people do not like the art direction they are seeing in the construction, and that is a part of discussing construction. The reveal of choices.

Sorry if this leads you to frustration or hyperbole.
I’m not sure why you are trying to group yourself and those who are actually talking about construction into my point, I’m talking about those who use this thread to insert their opinion on why splash change is bad and what not. It’s about those who continue to use this thread to reiterate their dismay over the entire thing for the umpteenth time
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
I’m not sure why you are trying to group yourself and those who are actually talking about construction into my point, I’m talking about those who use this thread to insert their opinion on why splash is bad and what not. It’s about those who continue to use this thread to reiterate their dismay over the entire thing for the umpteenth time
As new images and videos of the construction are released, it helps inform us how the attraction will look.The official releases updating us on the attraction and the construction keep referencing this co-op. Unless there’s a new subplot they’re keeping under wraps, we can infer more and more about this project the more that’s released. The use of the murals, which is one of the more visible artistic artifacts in the attraction to date, deeper into the ride supports this view that the Tiana’s Foods makes an outsized presence in the ride.
 

Mikomike12

Well-Known Member
As new images and videos of the construction are released, it helps inform us how the attraction will look.The official releases updating us on the attraction and the construction keep referencing this co-op. Unless there’s a new subplot they’re keeping under wraps, we can infer more and more about this project the more that’s released. The use of the murals, which is one of the more visible artistic artifacts in the attraction to date, deeper into the ride supports this view that the Tiana’s Foods makes an outsized presence in the ride.
While you wait for more details perhaps go to thread meant to discuss things like so..
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
my statement was anything but vauge, I stated my point quite clearly, not sure what’s not to understand. Far from hyperbolic aswell.

You shuffled through 30 pages today to get to one photo of the mural posted multiple times?

That's hyperbole.

I love the joke within that though. Instead of saying "I am not hyperbolic" "Far from hyperbolic" is quite a funny statement.

If you want news article and image format releases of the attraction's progress. wdwmagic.com home mage would be the best place to get that without the discussion.
 
Last edited:

Disgruntled Walt

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
I’m talking about those who use this thread to insert their opinion on why splash change is bad and what not.
WHO IS DOING THAT? There's a handful of people on this thread that pull out this accusation every time people start negatively talking about a new development of this attraction. Not one person has compared this to Splash recently except to mention that there was farm equipment on it.

Can we get a new rule that only site moderators can pass judgment on the state of a thread? It's starting to get on my nerves.

What do you think of the mural @Mikomike12? Share your opinion! It's fun to discuss!
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
WHO IS DOING THAT? There's a handful of people on this thread that pull out this accusation every time people start negatively talking about a new development of this attraction. Not one person has compared this to Splash recently except to mention that there was farm equipment on it.

Can we get a new rule that only site moderators can pass judgment on the state of a thread? It's starting to get on my nerves.

What do you think of the mural @Mikomike12? Share your opinion! It's fun to discuss!
It’s thread gatekeeping to cut down on negative talk. The vast majority of the posts have commented how out of place the mural(s) seem, and none bring up SM.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
It’s thread gatekeeping to cut down on negative talk. The vast majority of the posts have commented how out of place the mural(s) seem, and none bring up SM.

I posted a video from 1992 for sure when someone said their figures never really moved. That was just to put an end to that side discussion. But it was not to compare becuase the new ones are not open to be seen yet.

The actual merit talk has been soley on what is seen so far which is all one can do with the discussion.

Agree on the gatekeeping situation. Even when it is claimed as passive, it is still present.

The connection of the mural to the discussion of how it ties into the story is totally valid and not a "rehash of grievances." and would be discussed the same if it was a new ride build as it is a construciton update.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom