News Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
I haven't seen where Iger was speaking specifically about Tiana's Bayou Adventure, but I think he was acknowledging that by putting so much emphasis on the cultural and representational aspect of the stories Disney's been telling, it crossed a big and vocal chunk of fans who don't care about all that and see it as indicative of societal decline.

But I also know Disney has another big chunk of fans who scrutinize their every move for appropriation, exclusion, and bad representation.

I don't think Disney anticipated that the first group would respond so vehemently to their attempts to be inclusive of the second.

Meaning… that they view it as an issue that needs to be corrected or they’ll continue losing money.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
So how is this ride going to age? poorly. Splash Mountain was one of the greatest theme park rides ever made, it was a big draw for people to the parks, now it's like replacing space mountain with the spiderman ride or the small world with a toy story mania clone.
And this, I believe is why they're rooting it in actual U.S. history and African American/bayou culture rather than JUST on the Princess and the Frog story. That will make it more timeless vs. just a trendy IP.
 

plutofan15

Well-Known Member
updates are great. Snow White at Disneyland (along with the other dark rides there) are great examples of updating classic attractions.

Maelstrom and the Energy pavilion both needed updates, yes. They did not need complete rethemes that ruin the pavilions connection with the park.

And I was referring to Mission Breakout at California Adventure, although Cosmic Rewind isn’t much better but in a few years it can be re-themed back to universe of energy since it’s all screens anyways, haha.
My bad. I got my Mission Breakout and Cosmic Rewind wires crossed. I would have to agree that I thought retheming Tower of Terror in California Adventure was a mistake. Then we visited a few years back and rode it. I must admit that it was a lot of fun - completely different vibe from Tot. I actually enjoyed it. At that time I thought that it looked out of place but perhaps that has changed with the build out of the Avengers Campus. Cosmic Rewind is in the top two or three rides for my family in all of WDW so not a failure at all. Agreed that connection story to Epcot is weak but the vast majority of people could care less.
And as far as the Frozen ride "ruining" the Norway pavilion, I respectfully disagree 100%.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
Meaning… that they view it as an issue that needs to be corrected or they’ll continue losing money.
I know some here blame "messaging" for Disney's recent box office misses, but I don't think it's so simple. Disney is rebuilding its movie business around Direct-to-Consumer, and I think that's having a big effect on box office.

I'm also not sure the audiences who are reacting badly to "messaging" are skipping their annual trips to WDW or unsubscribing from D+.

The negative PR isn't great, though, and like we've seen on these boards, a particular segment of the fan base reacts poorly to the very thought of no longer being the center of Disney's efforts and seem to do what they can to take the fun out of Disney for everyone.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
Are they reacting poorly because they re not the center or because the story isn’t the center? This whole conversation started because of the mural that doesn’t fit in Frontierland or 1930’s New Orleans. Not because of Tiana.
I think they'd say it's because the story isn't at the center. But I think it's actually because they might be less of the focus. Why do I think this? Because the insistence that the TBA mural is "objectively bad," or "looks like something a child would do."

But by whose standards does it not fit? The audience segment feeling scorned. The WDI team thinks it fits. Disney retains the rights to change the area from Frontierland to Bayou land (or literally anything else).

To be clear: it's perfectly fine to not like the mural, to miss Splash Mountain, or to critique the theme or its execution.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
I think they'd say it's because the story isn't at the center. But I think it's actually because they might be less of the focus. Why do I think this? Because the insistence that the TBA mural is "objectively bad," or "looks like something a child would do."

But by whose standards does it not fit? The audience segment feeling scorned. The WDI team thinks it fits. Disney retains the rights to change the area from Frontierland to Bayou land (or literally anything else).

To be clear: it's perfectly fine to not like the mural, to miss Splash Mountain, or to critique the theme or its execution. But in my opinion, minority cultures should be treated respectfully and not subject to mean spirited and condescending criticism from majority cultures, which is what I'm seeing a lot of here.

My point is that the WDI team isn’t too concerned if it fits. Or at least not as concerned as the primary reason for it existing. I’m about 99% sure that it TBA was built 6 years ago that mural wouldn’t exist.

I think the art looks fine. It has its place. Its place just isn’t at Frontierland and part of an attraction that’s supposed to be set in 1920’s New Orleans. The one with Louis looks out of place but the other one with those faces (that I’m not sure I saw until recently) really looks out of place. I do believe things can be objectively ugly or beautiful.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
My point is that the WDI team isn’t too concerned if it fits. Or at least not as concerned as the primary reason for it existing. I’m about 99% sure that it TBA was built 6 years ago that mural wouldn’t exist.

I think the art looks fine. It has its place. Its place just isn’t at Frontierland and part of an attraction that’s supposed to be set in 1920’s New Orleans. But I’m also not an art buff. The one with Louis looks out of place but the other one with those faces (that I’m not sure I saw until recently) really looks out of place. I do believe things can be objectively ugly or beautiful.
Did you see my post from this morning trying to show the art style's consistency with the self-taught memory painters? I think it's a pretty strong connection.

Totally fine for you to say, "I think it looks out of place." But if someone who is from there and steeped in that culture say, "no, actually, it's pretty authentic," it seems like a good response would be open-mindedness to new insight rather than dismissal based on your personal preferences.
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
Did you see my post from this morning trying to show the art style's consistency with the self-taught memory painters? I think it's a pretty strong connection.

Totally fine for you to say, "I think it looks out of place." But if someone who is from there and steeped in that culture say, "no, actually, it's pretty authentic," it seems like a good response would be open-mindedness to new insight rather than dismissal based on your personal preferences.


Yeah I can see the connection but I think whether it’s authentic or not is irrelevant because it’s not authentic to the time period and looks out of place in the land (and park) it resides in. Obviously this mural just doesn’t feel right for a lot of people. We shouldn’t have to do mental gymnastics to make it work. Because if that needs to happen that means the imagineers didn’t do their job.
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
I don’t know who you are, nor know your background or education in these things. Even a generous view of actual historical figures or events this claims to draw inspiration from is off by a few decades, as is the case with this mural and art. Maybe they should have set it in the late 50’s or 60’s when it would’ve been more authentic to actual people and events.
Oh, I agree they seem to be taking some creative license here. They seem to be pulling in geography from well outside New Orleans, business practices from 15- or so years later, and art styles that were popularized 20 years after the 1920's setting of the film. All these things did actually exist in the time of TBA's setting, though.
 

DisneyNorthFan

Active Member
I'm enjoying the construction updates, and what I'm seeing. I'm looking forward to seeing more! Going all in and making more dramatic changes without doing a "book report" Fantasyland attraction is a noble effort. We know the ride will be fun - long, action-packed, and immersive ... that's not changing. It sounds like they are incorporating lots of characters and animatronics. There will be plenty of "critters" that will be cute and fun. And the main character and songs are loved by many ... so I'll continue to be optimistic for what's coming. We know the attraction needed A LOT of TLC. While this is certainly eating more budget than would have been necessary for a straight refurb, it's also much more marketable to a new generation of Disney fans. There's no marketability to a refurbed Splash Mountain. Most that come to Disney are on their first visit. Might this motivate someone to make a trip? I certainly think it would. Not everything is done for the repeat visitor ... although I don't see how this should be a bad thing for those repeaters - and as repeat visitor myself, I'll fondly remember Splash, but look forward to something new, too.
 

ᗩLᘿᑕ ✨ ᗩζᗩᗰ

HOUSE OF MAGIC
Premium Member
Assuming I'm reading the leaves correctly, one thing I'm looking forward to is the addition of a fog screen and/or fog effects. It lends itself well in creating a swampy bayou mystique. So often fog and smoke effects are left on the cutting room floor or turned off later, never to return. With the addition of that "True Bayou Magic" hint, it seems likely it'll be a key aspect of the attraction. Possibly right before the big drop! Oh and scents too! Gimmicky to some, but I think they'll enhance and further differentiate it from the original attraction.
 

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
Assuming I'm reading the leaves correctly, one thing I'm looking forward to is the addition of a fog screen and/or fog effects. It lends itself well in creating a swampy bayou mystique. So often fog and smoke effects are left on the cutting room floor or turned off later, never to return. With the addition of that "True Bayou Magic" hint, it seems likely it'll be a key aspect of the attraction. Possibly right before the big drop! Oh and scents too! Gimmicky to some, but I think they'll enhance and further differentiate it from the original attraction.
Fog and smoke is a problem with ride sensors in many cases and that is why it goes away in real life applications
 

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
I'm hopeful that log flumes get a pass. Seems like they might plan to incorporate some.
Imagine fog at the bottom of the drop blocking a sensor that tells the brake at the top to let another RV drop out, if the way is not clear the brake won't release and the ride goes down until the control has all the sensor readings back. Dropping through fog would be OK but at the block transitions it will interfere
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom