Thank-you for repeating yourself again.I'm doing this because it's annoying that Disney is being praised for something that they're most likely doing out of cowardice.
What about what @TP2000 claimed about how the connection to Song of the South wasn't the reason but rather a desire to sell Tiana merchandise and "Instagrammable" food?
That's speculation. If there really were plans to retheme Splash Mountain to The Princess and the Frog back in 2009, I imagine those plans went out the window once the movie "underperformed".
Indeed.
How so? I gave you reasons why it didn't.
So why is the reason I keep bringing up (that they are indeed doing this because people online demanded it) constantly being brushed off as false?
We have no proof of that being true.
Because Disney couldn't possibly have been lying when they said that, right?
That was referring to another poster.
So you're basically saying that we should be okay with Disney getting rid of any attraction because they own it, not us, and other attractions have been closed in the past. Basically claiming we shouldn't care about attractions because they're just bound to close anyway.
By that logic, why should we care about Disney parks at all? Why should we go to the parks and ride these attractions when we know they'll eventually get shut down anyway? I could go to a state fair if I wanted to go on a ride. Are you implying that all of the hard work that went into attractions like Pirates, Matterhorn, Indiana Jones, etc. was pointless and doesn't matter because eventually they'll just get shut down anyway?
Hey, folks, let's just stop responding.