Tiana's Bayou Adventure: Disneyland Watch & Discussion

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
This. I saw a poster here actually try and say the segue from hyper real to animation line of the human world and critter world were once closer than they are now was evidence to the stance that slavery was justified.
It can't just be a transition of storytelling line?
No. The poster was reiterating something that they had heard from others and simply brought it up because it was relevant to something another person brought up. They never claimed to believe it.
 

Mac Tonight

Well-Known Member
What's interesting to me... as this discussion has clearly grown legs and wandered off into it's own world... is that everyone who has "issues" with SotS and everything surrounding it... STILL ENJOYS SPLASH MOUNTAIN.

That's what you call ironic.

Carry on.
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
What's interesting to me... as this discussion has clearly grown legs and wandered off into it's own world... is that everyone who has "issues" with SotS and everything surrounding it... STILL ENJOYS SPLASH MOUNTAIN.

That's what you call ironic.

Carry on.
It’s not very ironic, since the issues from the movie aren’t in the ride.
 

Mac Tonight

Well-Known Member
It’s not very ironic, since the issues from the movie aren’t in the ride.
And yet... isn't that the very reason it's being re-themed? Haven't we just spent the last 233 pages discussing why the attraction, due to it's ties to the source material, has now been deemed "problematic" and therefore this re-theme is in the best interest of everyone???
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
And yet... isn't that the very reason it's being re-themed? Haven't we just spent the last 233 pages discussing why the attraction, due to it's ties to the source material, has now been deemed "problematic" and therefore this re-theme is in the best interest of everyone???
Some people have been saying that. Still not ironic that people don’t have a problem with Splash Mountain, a ride that is not exactly the same as SotS.
 

CaptinEO

Well-Known Member
Just a couple points:

1. Mulan was NOT film in a concentration camp. It was filmed NEAR an internment camp, within 20 miles I believe of the city where the camp exists.
The makers of the film even saw fit to thank the Turpan Municipal Bureau of Public Security, which the U.S. Commerce Department last October placed on its Entity List for engaging in "human rights violations and abuses in the implementation of China's campaign of repression, mass arbitrary detention, and high-technology surveillance against Uighurs, Kazakhs, and other members of Muslim minority groups in the XUAR."

Medium journalist Shawn Zhang, who claims to have mapped out the numerous camps in Xinjiang, wrote that if the "Mulan" film crew landed at the Turpan airport and traveled along highway G312 to the Shanshan Desert, "They could see at least seven re-education camps." Zhang told Taiwan News that "Re-education Camp No. 87" is located in Shanshan County a mere seven kilometers away from where the Shanshan Desert scenes were shot.


The entire province they filmed in is zoned for concentration camps and prisons.

Sounds like a great company. You want to keep defending them?
2. Just because a company does business with a certain country doesn't mean they support those countries actions especially on human rights.
Really? What does it mean then when you build a themepark and give the Chinese government a 50% stake in the park?

Half of every dollar spent in Disney Shanghai go straight to the Chinese government.

The mere fact they made a large business deal with the Chinese government shows they have zero concern over their human rights issues.

What does it mean when you use practical slave labor from the country to make your products.
3. It would be very hard for any company, especially a global media conglomerate, not to do business with a certain country either directly or indirectly. Companies from that country have their fingers in almost every sector of the US economy, including holding a large chunk of US debt. So while its nice to say lets boycott that certain country for xyz reason it would be almost impossible to completely do that as a company.

Yep this is my point, every global mega corp that has dealings in China have sold out to the point of losing their ethics.

Once you become so big that you start selling out to dictators to make money of their citizens, you have no morals left.

Corporations sell their souls to the human rights nightmare of China because they get 1 Billion new customers.

There's a point to draw the line and stop being a global megacorp.

But when you exist to ONLY make more money with NO ethics or care/concern, you get the situation we're in now, where companies are pleasing a dictatorship country that doesn't value free speech, democracy, or human life.
This is not to say that Disney can't do better, because I think they can and should. But looking at it from a macro level, every person in the US deals monetarily with that same country directly or indirectly without even realizing it.
That's true. It's a sad state of affairs. I'm not trying to single out Disney, every HUGE company has lost their morals to sell out to China it seems. It's not only Disney. All these companies are to blame as is our country for relying so much on Chinese labor.

We as individuals can't even buy things in stores that aren't made under poor conditions in 3rd world countries.
 

CaptinEO

Well-Known Member
Investigators for SACOM and China Labor Watch allege workers were given almost no rest and worked over 10 hours a day while sometimes being paid 8.68 yuan (S$1.78) an hour.

They lived in poor conditions and lacked safety equipment to protect them against toxic chemicals, said the reports.

The SACOM report also said old equipment and worker-fatigue caused workplace accidents.





Mr. Iger, 65, has sought a personal relationship with China’s paramount leader, President Xi Jinping. After Mr. Iger learned that Mr. Xi’s father, Xi Zhongxun, a revolutionary leader, had visited Disneyland in 1980, he pressed his staff to find a photograph. A color photograph shows the president’s father, who died in 2002, wearing a Mao suit, shaking hands with Mickey Mouse. Mr. Iger presented it to the Chinese leader as a gift and a symbol of their partnership.
When Mr. Xi stopped in Seattle last September, Mr. Iger was among the American executives on hand to welcome him. At the White House state dinner a few days later, Mr. Iger was seated at Mr. Xi’s table. Just last month, Mr. Iger flew to Beijing to meet the president at the Communist Party’s leadership compound.

“It’s good to see the fruits of efforts over the years,” a smiling Mr. Xi told Mr. Iger at a public meeting between the men at the Great Hall of the People in early May. “And I believe the new cooperation will continue to yield new outcomes.”
By 2009, the Chinese government was finally on board. It took a 57 percent stake in the Shanghai resort, which includes revenue from hotels, restaurants and merchandise sold on the grounds. Disney also gave the government a 30 percent piece of the Disney management company that runs the property.
 
Last edited:

Disney Irish

Premium Member
The makers of the film even saw fit to thank the Turpan Municipal Bureau of Public Security, which the U.S. Commerce Department last October placed on its Entity List for engaging in "human rights violations and abuses in the implementation of China's campaign of repression, mass arbitrary detention, and high-technology surveillance against Uighurs, Kazakhs, and other members of Muslim minority groups in the XUAR."

Medium journalist Shawn Zhang, who claims to have mapped out the numerous camps in Xinjiang, wrote that if the "Mulan" film crew landed at the Turpan airport and traveled along highway G312 to the Shanshan Desert, "They could see at least seven re-education camps." Zhang told Taiwan News that "Re-education Camp No. 87" is located in Shanshan County a mere seven kilometers away from where the Shanshan Desert scenes were shot.


The entire province they filmed in is zoned for concentration camps and prisons.

Sounds like a great company. You want to keep defending them?
Its not even about defending them, it was just pointing out that your statement that they filmed IN a concentration camp as incorrect. Did they choose a bad location, 100%.

Really? What does it mean then when you build a themepark and give the Chinese government a 50% stake in the park?

Half of every dollar spent in Disney Shanghai go straight to the Chinese government.

The mere fact they made a large business deal with the Chinese government shows they have zero concern over their human rights issues.

What does it mean when you use practical slave labor from the country to make your products.
And what about HKDL? That was built prior to Iger and Chapek, and was under Chinese rule and has a similar ownership stake as Shanghai.

Or what about all the consumer products produced over the last 50 years, long before Eisner, Iger, or Chapek, that came from China?

Yep this is my point, every global mega corp that has dealings in China have sold out to the point of losing their ethics.

Once you become so big that you start selling out to dictators to make money of their citizens, you have no morals left.

Corporations sell their souls to the human rights nightmare of China because they get 1 Billion new customers.

There's a point to draw the line and stop being a global megacorp.

But when you exist to ONLY make more money with NO ethics or care/concern, you get the situation we're in now, where companies are pleasing a dictatorship country that doesn't value free speech, democracy, or human life.

That's true. It's a sad state of affairs. I'm not trying to single out Disney, every HUGE company has lost their morals to sell out to China it seems. It's not only Disney. All these companies are to blame as is our country for relying so much on Chinese labor.

We as individuals can't even buy things in stores that aren't made under poor conditions in 3rd world countries.

This isn't even about mega corporations. Almost every aspect of modern life touches China in some way. Every dollar you earn or spend, part of it comes from or goes to Chinese investors in some direct or indirect way, and some goes to pay taxes some of which goes to China as they hold US debt. Should I condemn you for not taking a stand and not accepting any sort of living or that you pay taxes because some of it comes from or goes to China?

We are more intertwined globally than most of us realize. We have direct or indirect relations with almost every country in the world. So unless you are planning on completely going off the grid and living the Amish life you too are just as culpable as Disney. We can't just point the finger at mega corporations and say they are responsible, when its all of us.
 

Californian Elitist

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
8068186B-25FD-4426-B225-0BB892F84107.jpeg
 

Brer Panther

Well-Known Member
Anyone else willing to bet that the Facilier shadow that's apparently going to replace Brer Fox's shadow is going to be animated in really bad Adobe flash or something?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom