Dana Walden, Alan Bergman and Mr. Skinny Jeans himself, Josh D'Amaro are all potential successors according to the NYT article @MisterPenguin posted in post 171 in this thread.I would sure love for you to throw out a couple candidates.
LOL, give me the $25 million/year salary of Iger and tell me my job is to find the next CEO and I'll find you a host of candidates. OR, maybe I will say this is tougher than I expected, why don't you bump my pay and give me another 3 years.I would sure love for you to throw out a couple candidates.
Do you think there is no one out there that could possibly run Disney as “well” as Iger?I would sure love for you to throw out a couple candidates.
Because that’s at least when the still ongoing search for the next CEO began and Iger kept extending his term to search for a replacement. Then you contradicted yourself by claiming Chapek wasn’t chosen that far back when he had to be chosen pretty close to then in order for him to be the reason Staggs left.Why does 2014 matter?
Things ARE well. Iger isn't Eisner, and this isn't like 1999-2005 by a long shot. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with Disney at all, except Genie+/Lightning Lanes. These movies are great, these shows are great, these brands are vibrant and thriving. But the press thrives on spreading the Disney in disarray narrative, because they've been eager to make it so ever since 1995. Why? Because they are jealous and envious of Disney's success. The difference is that when they spread these reports back in '95/'96 when it wasn't true, Eisner took them to heart and MADE it true. Iger isn't like that. Heck, even Chapek, for his faults, didn't take things to THAT extent.I watched the interview and its the same ol’ Bob spouting rubbish that everything is well with parks and the movie studios.
That is indeed an odd thing to say.LOL, that is quite the piece. They lost me at saying it's all the board, then really lost me when it said the debt is cause of the pandemic.
Staggs left because he wasn't guaranteed in writing the position when Iger left. Rasulo was the one told he wasn't getting the position. So by the time the choice was made (2020) the only available choice was Chapek.Because that’s at least when the still ongoing search for the next CEO began and Iger kept extending his term to search for a replacement. Then you contradicted yourself by claiming Chapek wasn’t chosen that far back when he had to be chosen pretty close to then in order for him to be the reason Staggs left.
If that’s actually true, that Chapek was chosen in 2015, then why lie again that it’ll all be done during this extension and not just lay out the actually needed 6-8 year process? Why not go ahead and name names and start the training process that will take more than another 2 years?
Stop bullying me.Sure let’s just ignore the 50 times you reminded me that Iger would be leaving at the end of his contract.
Just like you defended Failcruiser for 500 pages but in one post you did say it was kinda expensive so you knew it was going to fail all along.
With the track record you have had lately, if you told me the sun was going to rise tomorrow, I would kiss my Wife and Kids goodbye because the asteroid is coming.
I do not think there are any candidates that have the requisite experience at this time. The only one I've seen named that has the corporate experience of a company this large (Tim Cook) wouldn't do it because its literally a step down from Apple to Disney.Do you think there is no one out there that could possibly run Disney as “well” as Iger?
So Chapek was not moved around for training after being chosen like you previously claimed?Staggs left because he wasn't guaranteed in writing the position when Iger left. Rasulo was the one told he wasn't getting the position. So by the time the choice was made (2020) the only available choice was Chapek.
Is that clearer for you?
... He was. I did not contradict that at all.So Chapek was not moved around for training after being chosen like you previously claimed?
And despite years to do so, Iger has not provided anyone with said experience.I do not think there are any candidates that have the requisite experience at this time. The only one I've seen named that has the corporate experience of a company this large (Tim Cook) wouldn't do it because its literally a step down from Apple to Disney.
But he did. The guy just failed.And despite years to do so, Iger has not provided anyone with said experience.
How? How was Chapek being in charge of consumer products and parks him being moved around and training in different areas of the company? Why was this not announced despite years of promises for a public succession plan? Why was he not made COO so he’d have a true top level role?But he did. The guy just failed.
What other sector would there be to run? He's not a creative so he's not going to run a studio...How? How was Chapek being in charge of consumer products and parks him being moved around and training in different areas of the company? Why was this not announced despite years of promises for a public succession plan? Why was he not made COO so he’d have a true top level role?
And since he failed to train properly the first time when given so many years, why should we expect success the second time?
Who knows if Kevin Mayer would have stayed if he was in the running for CEO. He left for greener pastures to be CEO of Tik Tok only to be fired 3 months into his new role.Staggs left because he wasn't guaranteed in writing the position when Iger left. Rasulo was the one told he wasn't getting the position. So by the time the choice was made (2020) the only available choice was Chapek.
Is that clearer for you?
Guess we will have to wait if the white smoke comes out of the pipe stack. Then a new leader!Is Iger going to be treated like the Pope? CEO until you die.
I firmly believe that is his plan as of now. I've even posted (only partially joking) about it twice.Is Iger going to be treated like the Pope? CEO until you die.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.