SirLink
Well-Known Member
The person that "stated that" to you must have been referring to most states, as Disneyland is only advertised to maybe 1/3 of them - in the geographic area around Southern California, within a day or two drive, at most.
In any case, only a tiny percentage of folks care about clones. International or not. Sounds like your Australian friends just wanted a free ticket to one of the other parks for the day, to be honest.
Real people (the majority of the public, most consumers, whatever you want to call them) view Disney (particularly the MK-style) as a chain of parks - they don't expect this "special snowflake" uniqueness that some Internet fanbois demand is essential. More people are surprised they aren't the same than expect them to offer fully unique experiences.
It's the same reason people balk at being asked if they visited Disneyland Paris when they were in France - "I'm in France, why in heck would I go some place that I could go to at home anytime?" They think it's just the MK (or Disneyland) in France, not that it's such a unique park.
Weren't my friends just overheard those Australians complaining . Maybe the marketer who made that comment was more routed in the fact that certain states affinities along with the Bugs Bunny sawing off Florida meme.
Real people want there to be differences to motivate them them to see different parks. They don't balk or at least British and European citizens don't it tends to be Americans, that do the balking either a)they didn't do they due diligence in researching attractions around Paris or b)they couldn't afford to go ...