Gabe1
Ivory Tower Squabble EST 2011. WINDMILL SURVIVOR
as long its not an ipad or another tablet
So I can use a laptop?
as long its not an ipad or another tablet
only if its a surface proSo I can use a laptop?
Thanks for that information, but, I do have one question. Don't I always? When you say "local officials" what do you mean? Since it was a secret land grab, how would they have known that Walt was even considering doing anything in Florida?
Actually, 50 years later, as we're getting a soccer stadium no one really wanted, I'm not sure the good ol' boy network running everything behind the scenes has changed too much.
MiceChat's shift has spun so far out of control that the place to find people calling the MiceAge Update a bunch of lies is the MiceChat Forums. You've got a problem when the House that Lutz built is now full of people who proudly proclaim that they only trust the DisneyParks Blog and that rumors shouldn't be a topic for discussion.Speaking of which, so Andy 'Fidel's Little Bro' Castro sorta gives me a backhanded compliment on the Twitter about the Toontown/Frozen etc news, yet at the same time appears to be taking a shot at Todd and Norm for putting out that column. Look, I get that Micechat has become an aggregator of various Disney and non-Disney theme park content. It's not simply the place where Al Lutz pontificated for so many years.
But I think Rule No. 1 of having the site supply, and give your content attention, should be an underlying faith that whatever goes in that main column (Al's former one) is quite well vetted and the best stuff on the 'net. If you think they're just putting out BS for attention, then I'd suggest that you don't know the people and that maybe you shouldn't be supplying them with your lovely pics.
While I agree with a lot of what your saying here, and agree, there are a lot of other forces at play besides just price alone. The quality of what they are selling (both food and merch) isn't on par with what they are charging. The fact you can get the same merchandise online with free shipping @disneystore.com (or walmart/target/ebay/other) for the same products the sell in the parks is a big reason we don't buy as much. Also, we always would by something resort specific, but since they don't offer that anymore, one less thing we buy. The entire "Disney Parks" thing is a big driver of "low increases".There are growing signs that the latest round of theme park price hikes have run their course, becoming increasingly ineffective.
After three consecutive years of 7% or higher across-the-board price increases at the theme parks, tickets are up 4% this year, while the Disney Dining Plan is up 4.6%, increases that still are well above household income but at least a bit more sane. What gives?
Disney reports “Supplemental revenue data” in its 10K. For Parks & Resorts, this data contains “Merchandise, food and beverage” revenue and “Admissions” revenue.
Prior to 2010, merchandise, food and beverage revenue was higher than admission revenue, typically 1% to 5% higher. In other words, for every $1 in ticket sales, Disney sold $1.01 to $1.05 in merchandise, food, and beverage.
In recent years, Disney has aggressively increased all prices at the theme parks. As a result, merchandise, food, and beverage revenue was down to 89% of admissions revenue in 2013 (i.e. 89 cents on the dollar).
Merchandise, food, and beverage can be thought of as discretionary spending. If I want to visit a Disney theme park, I have to purchase a ticket. However, once inside the gate, I don’t have to purchase anything.
By raising prices faster than what people can afford, Disney has forced guests to cut back elsewhere. Instead of spending at WDW, they eat, drink, and shop offsite, where prices are significantly less.
In 2013, admissions revenue was up 11% while merchandise, food, and beverage revenue was up only 6%. The gap between the two has never been wider.
Last year, domestic attendance was up 4% while prices were up more than that. Yet Disney managed only 6% growth on merchandise, food, and beverage revenue. That’s just bad.
People still want to visit Disney theme parks, still need to eat, still need to drink, still want to buy souvenirs, but by squeezing tighter, Disney has lost a growing chunk of their vacation dollars.
Rather than drive guests offsite with higher prices, Disney needs to adopt a strategy that causes guests to spend all their vacation dollars onsite.
Disney needs to bundle hotel, ticket, food, and perhaps even merchandise into vacation packages that provide genuine savings to those willing to spend all their vacation dollars at WDW, not the disingenuous “raise prices 40% and then offer 30% discounts” strategy that they employ today.
Raising prices even more ain’t gonna cut it.
I only buy merch if it's something special. The last things I bought in the parks were a WDW 40th anniversary T-Shirt (which is strangely branded with Disneyland as well as WDW. Thanks "Disney Parks") and a MK 40th Vinylmation (the only one I own and ever plan to own). More recently I bought that Maelstrom shirt off the Disney Store website. Nothing ever really captures my eye cause it's all so bland.While I agree with a lot of what your saying here, and agree, there are a lot of other forces at play besides just price alone. The quality of what they are selling (both food and merch) isn't on par with what they are charging. The fact you can get the same merchandise online with free shipping @disneystore.com (or walmart/target/ebay/other) for the same products the sell in the parks is a big reason we don't buy as much. Also, we always would by something resort specific, but since they don't offer that anymore, one less thing we buy. The entire "Disney Parks" thing is a big driver of "low increases".
@WDW1974 what do you think of the Paint the Night sneak peeks that have surfaced online? They're pretty stellar if you ask me.. Any news on Disneyland's version?
I make the money back by eating breakfast at the resorts where you don't pay a gratuity so you save a full 20%. We also saved on our mugs. Breakfast for four of us was around 40.00 per morning. We saved 8.00 per morning times 8 days. For our trip in May and June alone, we got all our money back. On top of that, we ate at Restaurantosaurus and Pizzafari at Animal Kingdom. We had friends with us for a total of 8 people. We saved a full 20% on those bills. So, all our table service amounts were like free money to us.
However, AP holders and DVC members get a 10% discount at a number of restaurants. So depending on where you eat, you might only save an additional 10% on top of the discount you would have gotten anyway.
thers a few folk here Id commit for 20 years
You need to spend $500 at table service to make it worth it with an AP (I paid $100 for mine). I'll get the value out of it with a trip with 9 people. 2 meals pretty much covers it. Having said that, I can imagine that most people can't get that value out of it.
These wouldn't happen to have anything to do with what you were hinting at @WDW1974?
Andy Sinclair-Harris @1lowereastside · Aug 14
About to get a lot more 'chilly' at Hong Kong Disneyland...
After all, the train is still down for a while with Ironman and that would happen to be the last logical location to build an additional guest pathway below the tracks to access the expansion plots and build out fantasyland...
Perhaps I'm just reading into things too much and connecting a little too many dots...
Did the thread just die?
@WDW1974
How much of Miceage's new article is true? The construction delays in Shanghai, pushing the opening back to possibly Summer 2016?
Resort opening in phases?
Namely- this??
I'd really appreciate your input... as I tend to trust you (and your fab sense of style) a bit more than Miceage/micechat....
speaking of rumors.. anyone knows about the rumours of the replacement of Wishes?
Because they need something to hype. This is also part of why projects coming out of Walt Disney Imagineering cost so much. They paid people to develop a convoluted story that really means nothing since it will have no impact on content. Its a ridiculous way to justify their aesthetic choices.
My bigger problem with the backstory for Disney Springs is that it is self negating. A backstory is to set up an environment by providing a foundation that can inform every aspect of design. Despite what a good many Disney fans like to say, strong fictional environments are grounded by rules and the backstory is the foundation for those rules. In Disney Springs it is all there to justify a contemporary setting that is far too open ended and almost anything will fit, the limits having more to do with traditional mall restrictions (giving tenants a level of exclusivity, nothing too alienating to a wide demographic, etc.)
I was told a long time ago by an old-timer in Ocala that Walt's original vision was a park in the Ocala area, and in fact had bought several parcels of land in that area. Seems to make some sense considering the Welcome area that was there for years. Can anyone back that up?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.