It doesn't bother me, and I haven't disappeared. I haven't been checking in as much because whenever I do, it seems like the same posters are rambling on about the same things. That, plus the "summer style" posting is in full swing around the forums lately. To be fair, though, I have to say that
@PhotoDave219's Diagon Alley review was one of the most insightful and exciting posts I've read in a while.
Oh thank goodness. I was afraid you had been killed by a WDW bus while rushing for a morning photoshoot and they had paid Mrs. Bricker off to keep it quiet.
Seriously, I haven't had a chance to check out your site the last few weeks and I am staying (largely) clear of Twitter, so I thought you were on a trip somewhere! Glad you are here.
And summer has started slowly (thankfully) in MAGICland.
As for WDSP v. DHS, I disagree with your numbers (4 v. 8), but I do agree that however you count, WDSP has more. My issue with WDSP is--as you point out--that it's ugly. Saying it "may" be the ugliest Disney park is an understatement. There are amusement parks that outdo it in terms of design. Obviously aesthetics matter a lot to me because of the photos, but even before I got into photography, I've felt that the defining characteristic of a theme park is the design. Attractions--without a doubt--are incredibly important, but for me, design is right up there. I think this is especially true for regulars, as there are only so many times you can do any particular attraction before you need an alternative reason to come back. For me, that sense of place is the reason I enjoy visiting so much. That's why I still love Epcot, even as it is a shell of its former self. To each their own, but that's my take.
I don't disagree, but I have spent far less time there than in any American Disney park, DLP or HKDL. I am sure you have barely spent any at all. So, I'm not tired of the attractions at all. As for the design, you are quite right. It was totally done on the cheap and is one of the ugliest parks I have been to. It's been made slightly better by the addition of ToT. I think the Rat area looks amazing, though. And I don't care about photographs. When I want one, I simply ask Angie to take care of that and she does. I think your routine is fine for taking park pics, but I am not sure it allows you to enjoy a park (especially one like DSP that isn't photogenic) to its fullest.
I enjoy EPCOT's ambiance, but so much makes me sad there because I went for decades when you didn't have to just walk around with a drink in your hands to enjoy yourself. There are plenty of beautiful places that don't charge you $100 a day.
As for WDSP's design, the entrance to that park is insultingly bad, and I think it was a huge mistake not to do a DCA-style relaunch with the Ratatioulle area plus a new front entrance. I'm not sure what could be done due to how Tower of Terror was just sort of plopped down, but I'm sure something could be done. The rest of the park feels like a parking lot with some rides plopped down, and even its (former) flagship attraction, Crusher's Coaster, I feel is overrated.
See, I think the entrance is the best damn part of the design. To me, it's all downhill after that. The huge soundstage area works both from a theme PoV and from a let's provide an area to escape what can be harsh weather one as well. I don't think it needs a new entrance. It desperately needs some water and trees, though. And, much like in FL, the tram tour has to go. It serves no purpose.
Crush's Coaster is fun. It's a nice attraction for what it is ... sorta that park's version of the SDMT, only better and longer.
Of course, it doesn't help WDSP that the second most beautiful Disney park in the world is right next door, which makes it look even worse by comparison. Heck, I'll bet Thunder Mesa/Frontierland cost more to construct than the entirety of WDSP when it opened!
DSP cost at opening was widely pegged at $600 million. That is absolutely nothing ... and it shows to this day.
Now, before anyone thinks this is some defense of DHS, it's not. DHS has a ton of problems and is in dire need of serious work, but in terms of design, I think it's worlds ahead of WDSP. With that said, when looking at the whole picture in a "for what they are" sense, I would be very tempted to put Typhoon Lagoon ahead of both studios parks.
MGM was a beautiful park from opening day (yes, I was there!) to the late 90s. It has since become a total mess. When filming largely stopped, they started opening backstage areas up and making them part of the theme park in a very haphazard way. They've never had a master plan (only WDW park that didn't) for expansion, so things like cast parking were constantly relocated. I can't look at the animation studio (knowing what was created and some of the talent that toiled there) and see it used as exec office space and call cubicles and not want to shed a few tears. And then there is the giant hat ...
No, DSP isn't beautiful. But Disney-MGM was like a beautiful house before a gang of methheads moved in and it is quite painful to see it that way.
I didn't even mention Sid's because if I did, then I'd start flinging the 'f word' around. (no, not flatulent!)